Jharkhand Court June 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Anita Kumari Vs. the State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jun-19-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No. 1715 of 2013 Anita Kumari .... Petitioner(s) Versus State of Jharkhand ... Opposite Party Coram : HONBLE MR. JUSTICE D.N.UPADHYAY For the petitioner (s): Mr. Nilesh Kumar For the opposite party : Addl.P.P. 19.06.2013 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel for the State. This is an application for anticipatory bail flied by the petitioner in connection with Ramgarh PS case No. 132 of 2011 for the offence registered under sections 147/148/149/307/323/324/341/342/353/332/333/337/338/379 IPC It reveals from FIR that a mob led by the petitioner and co-accused Manoj Mahato has created jaam on the road (NH23) causing hindrance to traffic. When the police party reached and tried to disperse the mob, members in the mob became furious and violent and they pelted stones causing injuries to the police personnel. Learned counsel for the State has opposed the prayer. Considering above aspects of the matter, the petitio...
Smt Suparna Mandal Ram and anr Vs. Sachi Dulal and anr
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jun-19-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Civil Revision No. 38 of 2012 Smt. Suparna Mandal (Ram) & Anr. .... .. Appellants Versus Sachi Dulal & Anr. ...... Respondents --- CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE P.P.BHATT For the Appellants : M/s. Gauri Devi, N.K. Sahani, Adv. For the respondents : - -- 2/19.06.2013 Learned counsel for the appellant Mrs. Gauri Devi seeks permission to withdraw this revision application, as it has become infructous. Permission as sought for is granted. Civil Revision No. 38 of 2012 is disposed of as withdrawn. (P.P. Bhatt, J.) Saket/-...
Aditya Dhanraj Enterprises Pvt Ltd Through Its Director Pramod Kumar S ...
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jun-19-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(T) No. 3335 of 2013 Aditya Dhanraj Enterprises Pvt. Ltd. and others ...... Petitioners Vrs. Coal India Limited and others ...... Respondents ------ CORAM: HONBLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HONBLE MRS. JUSTICE JAYA ROY ------ For the Petitioners : Mr. Amit Kr. Sinha, Adv. For the Respondents: Mr. A.K. Mehta, Adv. Order No.2 Dated 19th June, 2013. Learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that he has removed the defects. Admit. List this matter along with W.P.(T) No.3087 of 2013. Meanwhile, operation of the communication dated 07.5.2013 and consequently recovery of the amount from the writ petitioners is hereby stayed. It is made clear that in case petitioners fail in the writ petition then they shall have to pay interest amount if it is required to be paid to the concerned taxing authority. (Prakash Tatia,C.J.) (Jaya Roy, J.) Sudhir...
Rakesh Kumar Vs. the State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jun-19-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A. B.A. No. 1698 of 2013 with A.B.A. No. 1668 of 2013 Subhash Oraon.........Petitioner ( in ABA 1698/13) Rakesh Kumar.....Petitioner ( in ABA 1668/13) Vs. The State of Jharkhand ........Opposite parties ( in both cases) CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRASHANT KUMAR For the Petitioners: Mr. Delip Jerath, Mr. Rajesh Kumar ( in ABA No. 1698/13) Mr. Amresh Kumar ( in ABA 1668/13) For the State: Mr. A.K. Pandey, APP ( in ABA 1698/13) Mr. Prem Prakash, APP ( in ABA 1668/13) 5/19.06.2013: Both the anticipatory bail applications are heard together as they arose from the same FIR. Anticipatory bail applications filed by petitioners Subhash Oraon and Rakesh Kumar are moved by Sri Delip Jerath and Sri Amresh Kumar and opposed by Sri A.K. Pandey and Sri Prem Prakash, learned Additional P.Ps. respectively. It appears that the scheme no. 4/04-05 was sanctioned for building a Check Dam in the village Sithiyo in the district of Lohardaga. It then appears that Laloo...
Bene Kerketta Alias Benedik Kerketta Vs. the State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jun-19-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND RANCHI A. B. A. No. 2096 of 2013 Bene Kerketta @ Benedik Kerketta .. ... Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand ... ... ... Opp. Party CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE PRASHANT KUMAR ............ For the Petitioner : Mr. A.K. Chaturvedi For the State : Mr. V.S. Sahay, A.P.P. ........ 2/19.06.2013 Anticipatory bail application filed by Bene Kerketta @ Benedik Kerketta is moved by Sri A.K. Chaturvedi, learned counsel for the petitioner and opposed by Sri V.S. Sahay, learned Additional PP. for the State. From perusal of prosecution report, I find that petitioner implicated in this case on the basis of disclosure made by some villagers. Name of said villagers have not been disclosed. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstance, I allow this anticipatory bail application and direct the petitioner to surrender in the court below on or before 29th of June 2013 and in the event of his surrender, the learned court below is directed to enlarge him on bail on furnis...
Labu Sk and ors Vs. the State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jun-19-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND RANCHI A. B. A. No. 2031 o1. Labu Sk.2. Raffijuddin Sk. @ Rabijuddin Sk.3. Fitu Sk. @ Abdul Rashid 4. Aji Jul Sk.5. Ahbedu Sk. ... ... ... Petitioners Versus The State of Jharkhand ... ... Opp. Party CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE PRASHANT KUMAR ............ For the Petitioners : Mrs. Nitu Sinha For the State : Mr. V.K. Tiwary, A.P.P. ........ 2/19.06.2013 Anticipatory bail application filed by Labu Sk., Raffijuddin Sk. @ Rabijuddin Sk., Fitu Sk. @ Abdul Rashid, Aji Jul Sk. and Ahbedu Sk. is moved by Mrs. Nitu Sinha, learned counsel for the petitioners and opposed by Sri V.K. Tiwary, learned Additional PP. for the State. It is alleged that petitioner No. 1 namely Labu Sk. was in possession of a fire arm. Under the said circumstances, I am not inclined to enlarge petitioner No. 1 namely Labu Sk. on anticipatory bail. Accordingly, his anticipatory bail application rejected. So far other petitioners namely Raffijuddin Sk. @ Rabijuddin Sk., Fitu Sk. @ Abdul Rashid...
Gaya Yadav and anr Vs. the State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jun-19-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A.No. 1943 of 2013. ----- 1. Gaya Yadav 2. Jichchu Yadav Petitioner. Versus The State of Jharkhand Opposite Party. . ..... Coram : The Hon'ble Mr. Justice Prashant Kumar. ----- For the Petitioner : Sri. S.S.Choudhary For the State : Sri.A.K.Pandey, A.P.P. ----- 02/19.06.2013. Anticipatory bail application filed by Gaya Yadav and Jichchu Yadav is moved by Sri. S.S.Choudhary , learned counsel for the petitioners and opposed by Sri. A.K.Pandey , Addl P.P. for the State. From perusal of allegations made in the F.I.R., it appears that no offence under section 384 of the I.P.C. is made out. Rest sections of the Indian Penal Code are bailable. There is general and omnibus allegations against all the accused persons that they opened fire. It further appears that present case is counter blast of earlier case filed by one Pradip Kumar Yadav who was supervising the work of petitioner. Considering the aforesaid fact and circumstance, I allow this applic...
Birbal Mahto and anr Vs. the State of Jharkhand and anr
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jun-19-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A.No. 2167 of 2013. ----- 1. Birbal Mahto 2. Saguni Devi Petitioners. Versus The State of Jharkhand Opposite Party. ..... Coram : The Hon'ble Mr. Justice Prashant Kumar. ----- For the Petitioners : Sri Prabhat Kr. Sinha For the State : Sri Sadhana Kumar, A.P.P. ----- 02/19.06.2013. Call for the case diary from the court concerned and put up this case after receipt of the same. In the meantime, petitioners shall not be arrested in connection with Ramgarh P.S. case no. 324/2005, corresponding to G.R. no. 1983/2005 (T.R. no. 1382/2013), pending in the court of Sub- Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Hazaribagh. ( Prashant Kumar, J.) Pramanik/...
Chandrakant Viswakarma Vs. Abhishek Kumar Sharma and ors
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jun-19-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI F.A. No. 183 of 2007 Chandrakant Viswakarma .... .. Appellant Versus Abhishek Kumar Sharma & Ors. ...... Respondents --- CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE P.P.BHATT For the Appellants : Mr. A.K. Amar, Adv. For the respondents : - -- 8/19.06.2013 I.A. No.3121 of 2007 The present interlocutory application is filed under Section 5 of the Limitation Act for condonation of delay of 123 days in preferring first appeal. The learned counsel appearing for the respondents have filed counter affidavit to the said I.A. and opposed this application. The learned counsel appearing for the respondents has also vehemently opposed this application at the time of argument. But, in view of the averments made in the application filed for condonation of delay, it appears that justified reasons have been stated by the appellant for condonation of delay. For the reasons stated, prayer is allowed. Delay in filing first appeal is condoned. First appeal be placed for 'Admission'....
Binod Yadav and ors Vs. the Union of India Through Its Secretary Depar ...
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jun-19-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(PIL) No. 3395 of 2013 Binod Yadav & Others ... Petitioners Versus The Union of India & others ... Respondents ------- CORAM: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE JAYA ROY ------ For the Petitioners : Mr. Shatrughan Lal, Sr. Advocate. For the Respondents : Md. Mokhtar Khan, ASGI. ------ Order No. 02 Dated 19th June, 2013 This petition has been listed in Court as permission was sought by the learned counsel for the petitioners for listing the matter in spite of the fact that there are defects but matter was of the urgency. According to learned counsel for the petitioners, the telephone exchange was running near the railway line and that was not suitable and, therefore, it was shifted to another place by the BSNL and from there again the BSNL wants to shift its exchange to the same place by incurring expenditure of Rs. 80 lacs in spite of the fact that the place was not found suitable by the BSNL itself. In view of the above reasons,...
- ‹ Prev
- 10
- 11
- 12
- 13
- 14
- 16
- 17
- 18
- 19
- 20
- Next ›
- Last »