Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Labu Sk and ors Vs. the State of Jharkhand

Labu Sk and ors vs The State of Jharkhand

Type Court Judgment Court Jharkhand Decided Jun 19, 2013
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/972765

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Jharkhand High Court
Decided On
Subject
Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue
Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Labu Sk and ors

Advocate Mrs. Nitu Sinha

Respondent

The State of Jharkhand

Excerpt

in the high court of jharkhand ranchi a. b. a. no. 2031 o”1. labu sk.2. raffijuddin sk. @ rabijuddin sk.3. fitu sk. @ abdul rashid 4. aji jul sk.5. ahbedu sk. ... ... ... petitioners versus the state of jharkhand ... ... opp. party coram: honble mr. justice prashant kumar ............ for the petitioners : mrs. nitu sinha for the state : mr. v.k. tiwary, a.p.p. ........ 2/19.06.2013 anticipatory bail application filed by labu sk., raffijuddin sk. @ rabijuddin sk., fitu sk. @ abdul rashid, aji jul sk. and ahbedu sk. is moved by mrs. nitu sinha, learned counsel for the petitioners and opposed by sri v.k. tiwary, learned additional pp. for the state. it is alleged that petitioner no. 1 namely labu sk. was in possession of a fire arm. under the said circumstances, i am not inclined to enlarge petitioner no. 1 namely labu sk. on anticipatory bail. accordingly, his anticipatory bail application rejected. so far other petitioners namely raffijuddin sk. @ rabijuddin sk., fitu sk. @ abdul rashid, aji jul sk. and ahbedu sk. are concerned, no fire arm found in their possession. considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, i allow the anticipatory bail application of petitioner nos. 2”4. and 5 namely raffijuddin sk. @ rabijuddin sk., fitu sk. @ abdul rashid, aji jul sk. and ahbedu sk.and direct them to surrender in the court below on or before 29th of june 2013 and in the event of their surrender, the learned court below is directed to enlarge them on bail on furnishing bail bond of rs. 10,000/-(ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned s.d.j.m. pakur, in connection with pakur (m) p.s. case no. 37 of 2013, corresponding to g.r. no. 116 of 2013, subject to the condition as laid down under section 438(2) of the cr. p.c. (prashant kumar, j.) binit

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND RANCHI A. B. A. No. 2031 o”

1. Labu Sk.

2. Raffijuddin Sk. @ Rabijuddin Sk.

3. Fitu Sk. @ Abdul Rashid 4. Aji Jul Sk.

5. Ahbedu Sk. ... ... ... Petitioners Versus The State of Jharkhand ... ... Opp. Party CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE PRASHANT KUMAR ............ For the Petitioners : Mrs. Nitu Sinha For the State : Mr. V.K. Tiwary, A.P.P. ........ 2/19.06.2013 Anticipatory bail application filed by Labu Sk., Raffijuddin Sk. @ Rabijuddin Sk., Fitu Sk. @ Abdul Rashid, Aji Jul Sk. and Ahbedu Sk. is moved by Mrs. Nitu Sinha, learned counsel for the petitioners and opposed by Sri V.K. Tiwary, learned Additional PP. for the State. It is alleged that petitioner No. 1 namely Labu Sk. was in possession of a fire arm. Under the said circumstances, I am not inclined to enlarge petitioner No. 1 namely Labu Sk. on anticipatory bail. Accordingly, his anticipatory bail application rejected. So far other petitioners namely Raffijuddin Sk. @ Rabijuddin Sk., Fitu Sk. @ Abdul Rashid, Aji Jul Sk. and Ahbedu Sk. are concerned, no fire arm found in their possession. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, I allow the anticipatory bail application of petitioner Nos. 2”

4. and 5 namely Raffijuddin Sk. @ Rabijuddin Sk., Fitu Sk. @ Abdul Rashid, Aji Jul Sk. and Ahbedu Sk.and direct them to surrender in the court below on or before 29th of June 2013 and in the event of their surrender, the learned court below is directed to enlarge them on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/-(Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned S.D.J.M. Pakur, in connection with Pakur (M) P.S. Case No. 37 of 2013, corresponding to G.R. No. 116 of 2013, subject to the condition as laid down under section 438(2) of the Cr. P.C. (Prashant Kumar, J.) Binit

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial