Jharkhand Court June 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
District Bar Association Chatra Through Its Secretary Subodh Kumar Mis ...
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jun-20-2013
INTHEHIGHCOURTOFJHARKHANDATRANCHI W.P.(PIL)No.1004of2013 DistrictrBarAssociation,Chatra .... .... .... Petitioner Versus StateofJharkhand&Ors. .... .... ....Respondents CORAM :HON'BLETHECHIEFJUSTICE HON'BLEMRS.JUSTICEJAYAROY ForthePetitioner :Mr.P.C.Tripathy,Sr.Advocate FortheRespondents : th OrderNo.02 Dated,20 June,2013 List this petition along with Writ Petition No.3483 of 2009.Meanwhile,therespondentStatemaylookintothegrievance ofMembersoftheBarofChatra. (PrakashTatia,C.J.) (JayaRoy,J.) SI/Anit...
Smt Panpati Devi and anr Vs. the State of Jharkhand and anr
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jun-20-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND RANCHI A. B. A. No. 2213 o1. Smt. Panpati Devi @ Panwati Devi 2. Shri Suchand Bhandari ... ... ... Petitioners Versus 1.The State of Jharkhand 2.Smt. Sabita Devi ... ... Opp. Parties CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE PRASHANT KUMAR ............ For the Petitioners : Mr. K.P. Deo For the State : Mr. Arun Kumar Pandey, A.P.P. ........ 2/20.06.2013 Issue notice to opposite party No. 2 under Registered cover with A/D as well as by ordinary process for which requisites etc. must be filed within one week, failing which, this application shall stand rejected without further reference to a Bench. In the meantime, petitioners above named shall not be arrested in connection with P.C.R Case No. 574 of 2010 pending in the court of Shri S.D. Dwivedi, Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Godda. (Prashant Kumar, J.) Binit...
Bishnu Kant Panjiyara Vs. the State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jun-20-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A. B.A. No. 2170 of 2013 Bishnu Kant Panjiyara .........Petitioner Vs. The State of Jharkhand ........Opposite party CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRASHANT KUMAR For the Petitioner: Mr.Nilendu Kumar For the State: None 2/20.06.2013: Anticipatory bail application filed by petitioner Bishnu Kant Panjiyara is moved by Sri Nilendu Kumar. No body appears on behalf of the State. It appears from the order dated 29.5.2013 passed in ABA No. 2071 of 2013 that co-accused Jubeda Khatoon has already deposited the defalcated amount i.e. Rs. 36,000/- and she has been granted anticipatory bail. It also appears that by the aforesaid order co-accused Abdus Samad @ Abdul Samad has been granted anticipatory bail. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstance, I allow this application and direct the petitioner to surrender in the court below by 01.07.2013 and in that event the court below is directed to enlarge the petitioner, above named, on bail on furnishing bail...
Maghan Mahto Alias Meghan Gope and ors Vs. State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jun-20-2013
INTHEHIGHCOURTOFJHARKHANDATRANCHI A.B.A.No.1972of2013 1.MaghanMahto@MeghanGope 2.BaijnathYadav 3.BajoDas 4.TikoSao 5.JagdishSao Petitioners Versus 1.TheStateofJharkhand 2.YuvrajYadav OppositeParties CORAM: HONBLEMR.JUSTICED.N.UPADHYAY ForthePetitioners:Mr.PrabhatKr.Sinha,Advocate FortheState :A.P .P. 02/20.06.2013 PetitionersaredirectedtomakecomplainantasO.P.No.2. IssuenoticetonewlyaddedO.P.No.2throughregisteredcoverwithA.D. aswellasthroughordinaryprocessforwhichrequisitesetc.mustbefiledwithin oneweek. Inthe meantime,petitioners shallnotbe arrestedinconnection with KodermaP.S.CaseNo.127of2012,correspondingtoG.R.CaseNo.340of2012, pendingintheCourtoflearnedChiefJudicialMagistrate,Koderma. (D.N.Upadhyay,J.) NKC...
Bablu Pandey Vs. State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jun-20-2013
INTHEHIGHCOURTOFJHARKHANDATRANCHI I.A.No.1631of2012 In Cr.Appeal(DB)No.271of2009 BabluPandey Appellant Versus TheStateofJharkhand Respondent CORAM: HON'BLEMR.JUSTICED.N.PATEL HON'BLEMR.JUSTICER.R.PRASAD FortheAppellant : None FortheState : A.P.P. 04/Dated:20 th June,2013 PerD.N.Patel,J.:1. Whenthematteriscalledout,learnedcounselfortheapplicantisabsent. Previouslyalsoon11thApril,2013,thematterwasadjournedattherequestof learnedcounselfortheapplicant.2. We have heard learned counsel for the StateA.P.P., at length. It is submittedbylearnedA.P.P.thatthecaseoftheprosecutionisbaseduponmore thanoneeyewitnesseswhoareP.W.3,P.W.4andP.W.5.Itisallegedthatthis applicanthascausedfirearminjuryuponthedeceased,whoexpiredbecauseof firearm injury.Moreover,medical evidence given by P.W6(Dr.TulsiMahto) who has carried out postmortem of the body of the deceased, is also corroborative to the depositions given by the eye witnesses. Moreover, it is submitted by learned A.P.P. that previously also prayer for sus...
Sanjay Kumar Sao Alias Sanjay Kumar Shaw Vs. State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jun-20-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr. Revision No. 434 of 2013 Sanjay Kumar Sao @ Sanjay Kumar Shaw ..... Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand .. Opposite Party -------- CORAM : HONBLE MR. JUSTICE H. C. MISHRA ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Rajan Raj, Advocate For the State : A.P.P. ------ 2/ 20.06.2013 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State. The petitioner is aggrieved by the order dated 15.4.2013 passed by Sri Anand Mani Tripathi, learned Judicial Magistrate 1st Class, Dhanbad, in G.R. No. 1992 of 2011, whereby the application filed by the petitioner for release of coal, seized in connection with this case from the refractory premises, has been rejected by the Court below, stating that earlier an application for release of coal was rejected on 26.11.2011. It is apparent from the impugned order itself that earlier an application for release of coal was rejected in view of the fact that at this stage, the case was in investigation itself. ...
Roshan Kumar Alias Guddu Kumar Vs. the State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jun-20-2013
. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A.No. 2189 of 2013. ----- Raushan Kumar @ Raushan Singh @ Guddu Kumar Petitioner. Versus The State of Jharkhand Opposite Party. . ..... Coram : The Hon'ble Mr. Justice Prashant Kumar. ----- For the Petitioner : Sri. Umesh Kr. Choubey For the State : Sri.Vikash Kishore, A.P.P. ----- 02/20.06.2013. Anticipatory bail application filed by Raushan Kumar @ Raushan Singh @ Guddu Kumar is moved by Sri. Umesh Kr. Choubey , learned counsel for the petitioner and opposed by Sri. Vikash Kishore , Addl P.P. for the State. It appears that co-accused Manoj Kumar @ Manoj Singh has been granted anticipatory bail by this Court vide order dated 10.04.2013 in A.B.A. No. 1095/2013 (Annexure-2). Allegations against this petitioner is similar to aforesaid co-accused. Considering the aforesaid fact and circumstance, I allow this application and direct the petitioner, named above, to surrender in the court below by 01/07/2013 . If petitioner surrenders by that tim...
Jasmit Singh Alias Sonu Alias J Singh Vs. the State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jun-20-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B. A. No. 3900 of 2013 Jasmit Singh @ Sonu @ J.Singh ... Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand ... Opposite Party -------- CORAM : HONBLE MR. JUSTICE H. C. MISHRA ------ For the Petitioner : Mr.Deepak Kumar, Advocate. For the State : A.P.P. ------ 5/ 18.06.2013 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the Prosecution. The petitioner has been made accused in connection with Telaiya P.S. Case No. 41 of 2013 corresponding to G.R. No. 233 of 2013 for the offence under Sections 419, 420, 467, 468 and 471 of the Indian Penal Code. From the FIR, it appears that the petitioner is the owner of an studio where forged driving license, Voter I.D. Card, PAN Card etc. were being manufactured. Some such driving license, Voter I.D Card, PAN Card etc were also recovered from the shop of the petitioner. In the facts of this case, I am inclined to enlarge the petitioner, Jasmit Singh @ Sonu @ J.Singh on bail. Accordingly, the petitioner, ...
Kaushal Kishore and ors Vs. State of Jharkhand and ors
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jun-20-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.S. No. 4200 of 2010 Kaushal Kishore & Others ..Petitioners Versus The State of Jharkhand & Ors. ..Respondents ----- Coram:HONBLE MR. JUSTICE NARENDRA NATH TIWARI For the Petitioners : Mr. Ram Shankar Das, Advocate For the State : JC to Sr.S.C. II ---- 08/20-06-2013 Learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission to withdraw this writ petition due to inherent defects in order to file a fresh writ petition. Learned counsel for the respondents has no objection. Permission, as sought for, is granted. This writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. I.A. No. 2861 of 2013 consequently stands disposed of. (Narendra Nath Tiwari, J) Rakesh/...
Amar Mahto Vs. the State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jun-20-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B. A. No. 3894 of 2013 Amar Mahto ... Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand ... Opposite Party -------- CORAM : HONBLE MR. JUSTICE H. C. MISHRA ------ For the Petitioner : Mr.Parth S.a.Swaroop Pati, Advocate. For the State : A.P.P. ------ 3/ 18.06.2013 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the Prosecution. The petitioner has been made accused in connection with Angara P.S. Case No. 82 of 2012 corresponding to G.R. No. 6335 of 2012, S.T No. 234 of 2013 for the offence under Sections 302 / 201 of the Indian Penal Code. The case relates to murder of the son of the informant whose dead body was recovered and petitioner and the co-accused have been made accused in this case. So far as the co-accused is concerned, it is alleged that the deceased had gone along-with him and subsequently, his dead body was found and so far as this petitioner is concerned, it is stated that there was some quarrel with the petitioner and accor...
- ‹ Prev
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- 13
- 14
- 15
- 16
- 17
- Next ›
- Last »