Excerpt
in the high court of jharkhand at ranchi b. a. no. 3894 of 2013 amar mahto ... petitioner versus the state of jharkhand ... opposite party -------- coram : honble mr. justice h. c. mishra ------ for the petitioner : mr.parth s.a.swaroop pati, advocate. for the state : a.p.p. ------ 3/ 18.06.2013 heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned a.p.p. for the prosecution. the petitioner has been made accused in connection with angara p.s. case no. 82 of 2012 corresponding to g.r. no. 6335 of 2012, s.t no. 234 of 2013 for the offence under sections 302 / 201 of the indian penal code. the case relates to murder of the son of the informant whose dead body was recovered and petitioner and the co-accused have been made accused in this case. so far as the co-accused is concerned, it is alleged that the deceased had gone along-with him and subsequently, his dead body was found and so far as this petitioner is concerned, it is stated that there was some quarrel with the petitioner and accordingly, there is suspicion against the petitioner also. learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case only on the basis of suspicion and there is no eyewitness to the occurrence. learned counsel has accordingly, prayed for bail. the submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner finds support from the impugned order also. in the facts of this case, i am inclined to enlarge the petitioner, amar mahto on bail. accordingly, the petitioner, named above, is directed to be released on bail, on furnishing bail bond of rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand), with two sureties of the like amount each, to the satisfaction of learned a.j.c.-xvii, ranchi in connection with angara p.s. case no. 82 of 2012 corresponding to g.r. no. 6335 of 2012, s.t no. 234 of 2013. ( h. c. mishra, j.) bs/
Full Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B. A. No. 3894 of 2013 Amar Mahto ... Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand ... Opposite Party -------- CORAM : HONBLE MR. JUSTICE H. C. MISHRA ------ For the Petitioner : Mr.Parth S.a.Swaroop Pati, Advocate. For the State : A.P.P. ------ 3/ 18.06.2013 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the Prosecution. The petitioner has been made accused in connection with Angara P.S. Case No. 82 of 2012 corresponding to G.R. No. 6335 of 2012, S.T No. 234 of 2013 for the offence under Sections 302 / 201 of the Indian Penal Code. The case relates to murder of the son of the informant whose dead body was recovered and petitioner and the co-accused have been made accused in this case. So far as the co-accused is concerned, it is alleged that the deceased had gone along-with him and subsequently, his dead body was found and so far as this petitioner is concerned, it is stated that there was some quarrel with the petitioner and accordingly, there is suspicion against the petitioner also. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case only on the basis of suspicion and there is no eyewitness to the occurrence. Learned counsel has accordingly, prayed for bail. The submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner finds support from the impugned order also. In the facts of this case, I am inclined to enlarge the petitioner, Amar Mahto on bail. Accordingly, the petitioner, named above, is directed to be released on bail, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand), with two sureties of the like amount each, to the satisfaction of learned A.J.C.-XVII, Ranchi in connection with Angara P.S. Case No. 82 of 2012 corresponding to G.R. No. 6335 of 2012, S.T No. 234 of 2013. ( H. C. Mishra, J.) BS/