Jharkhand Court April 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Khairul Khan Vs. the State of Jharkhand and anr
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Apr-15-2013
In the High Court of Jharkhand at Ranchi Cr.M.P. No.35 of 2013 Khairul Khan ..............................................Petitioner VERSUS The State of Jharkhand and another .....Opposite Parties CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.R.PRASAD For the Petitioner :Mr. K.S.Nanda For the State :A.P.P 4.15.4.13. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that under a scheme, Jetropha Production Committee, Ghingi and Jojhro were entrusted with the job to grow Jetropha plants and for that, money was already given to the Committee. After four years, when it was detected that number of Jetropha plants have not been grown to the extent of which money was given, a case was registered not only against the members of the Village Committee but also against the Block Development Officer and this petitioner, who happens tobe the Panchayat Sewak and others though neither this petitioner nor Block Development Officer had to do anything with the matter relating to growing up Jetropha plants and taken m...
Kuni Kumari Vs. the State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Apr-15-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No.48 of 2013 Kuni Kumari ..... Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand . Opposite Party CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE H.C. MISHRA For the Petitioner : Mr. Kailash Prasad Deo For the State : A. P.P. ----- 6/15.4.2013 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. Petitioner has been made accused for the offence under Sections 20(1)/22 of the N.D.P.S. Act, in connection with Lower Bazar P.S. Case No.241 of 2012, corresponding to Special Case No.14/12(N). From the FIR, it appears that from the possession of the petitioner, 11 KG of Ganza was recovered. In the facts and circumstances of the case, I am inclined to release the petitioner on bail. Accordingly, the petitioner Kuni Kumari is directed to be released on bail, on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Commissioner, Ranchi, in connection with Lower Bazar P.S. Case ...
Parmeshwar Tanti Vs. State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Apr-15-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI I.A. No. 304 of 2013 In Criminal Appeal (D.B)No. 1124 of 2012 Parmeshwar Tanti ... ... Appellant Versus The State of Jharkhand ... ... Respondent ---- CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D.N. PATEL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SHREE CHANDRASHEKHAR ---- For the Appellant : Mr. Sudhanshu Kumar Deo, Advocate For the Respondents : A.P.P 06/DATED 15 h April, 2013 Per D.N. Patel, J.1. The present Interlocutory Application has been preferred under Section 5 of the Limitation Act for condonation of delay of 1648 days in preferring the criminal appeal.2. Having heard the learned counsel for both the sides and looking to the facts and reasons stated in this interlocutory application especially, in paragraph nos. 3 and 4, there are reasonable reasons for condonation of delay.3. The appellant is in jail since long and because of poverty, he was unable to prefer appeal in time. This reason is not controverted in the counter-affidavit.4. In view of these facts, we hereby cond...
Rajesh Kumar Singh Vs. State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Apr-15-2013
INTHEHIGHCOURTOFJHARKHANDATRANCHI B.A.No.2177of2013 RajeshKumarSingh Petitioner Versus TheStateofJharkhand OppositeParty CORAM: HONBLEMR.JUSTICED.N.UPADHYAY ForthePetitioner :M/sAltmashKhan&Santosh,Advocates FortheState :A.P .P. 04/15.04.2013 Heardlearnedcounselfortheparties. ThepetitionerisaccusedinacaseregisteredunderSections419,420, 406&120B/34oftheIndianPenalCode. It reveals from the complaint that the accused persons, in a planed manner,cheatedthecomplainantandotheraggrieved. Theyhavepretended themselvestobethedirectorandemployeeofM/sSmoothAgroOrganicLtd. Companyandaskedthecomplainantandotherwitnessestodepositmoneyfor gettingfranchisesandtheywouldgetcommissionagainstsupplyoffoodgrains amongstthevillagers. It is submitted that the petitioner did not receive money from the complainantorotherwitnesses.Hehasbeenimplicatedinthiscasebecausehe wasworkingforthatcompanyandheisrottinginjailcustodysinceaboutsix months. LearnedcounselappearingfortheStateopposedtheprayerforbail. Consideringthe...
Karam Chandra Dwaruka and ors Vs. the State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Apr-15-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No. 4729 o1. Karam Chandra Dwaruka 2. Shravan Kumar Agarwal 3. Niraj Agarwal @ Nirad Agarwal @ Niraj Agarwal Agarwalla .... Petitioner(s) Versus State of Jharkhand & another ... Opposite Parties Coram : HONBLE MR. JUSTICE D.N.UPADHYAY For the petitioner (s): Mr. Rajesh Kumar For the opposite party : Addl.P.P. 15.04.2013 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned counsel for the State. This is an application for grant of anticipatory bail filed by the petitioners in connection with C.P case No. 82 of 2012 for the offence registered under sections 342/323/420/406/387/379/384/506/34 of the Indian Penal Code. It reveals that petitioners have realized money from the complainant on some pretext or other and they did not return the same. It is submitted that petitioner no.2 has also filed a case against the present complainant that he had taken rupees three lakhs and fifty thousand from him which he did not return. It is furth...
Jay Prakash Roy Vs. the State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Apr-15-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No. 4238 o1. Jay Prakash Roy @ Jay Praksh Roy 2. Sudarshan Roy 3. Bittu Kumar @ Vikaram Kumar Yadav ... Petitioners -V e r s u s- The State of Jharkhand ... Opposite Party CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE PRASHANT KUMAR. For the Petitioners : - Mr. R.S.P . Sinha, Sr. Advocate For the State : - Mrs. R. Sanchita, A.P.P . 04/15.04.2013 Anticipatory bail application filed by Jay Prakash Roy @ Jay Praksh Roy, Sudarshan Roy and Bittu Kumar @ Vikaram Kumar Yadav, is moved by Sri R.S.P. Sinha, learned senior counsel for the petitioners and opposed by Smt. R. Sanchita, learned Additional P.P. for the State. Admittedly, petitioners are not named in the first information report. In the case diary, the only allegation against them is that they are bodyguards and driver of the main accused Surendra Kumar Suman. In the first information report as well as in the case diary, no specific overt act alleged against these petitioners. It further appears that the ma...
Kishore Rana Vs. Banarsi Lal Sah
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Apr-15-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI WP(C) No. 4591 of 2012 Kishore Rana Petitioner Versus Banarsi Lal Sah Respondent --- CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE P.P.BHATT For the Petitioner : Mr. Lakhan Chandra Roy, Adv. For the Respondent : Mr. Arvind Kumar Chouddhary, Adv. --- Order No.06 Dated 15th April, 2013. The petitioner, by way of filing the present writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, has prayed for quashing and setting aside the order dated 24.5.12 passed by the Sub-Judge 1st, Deoghar in Title Eviction Suit No. 4/2010 whereby, the courts below allowed the petition filed by the respondent plaintiff under Section 15 of Bihar Building Control Act, 1982 and directed the petitioner to deposit the arrears of rent of Rs. 20,000/- within 15 days the petitioner is also directed to deposit the current rent in court on or before 15th of every month from August 2011 during the pendency of the the suit.2. Heard the learned counsel for the parties and perused the impugned ...
Jaymangal Hazra Vs. the State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Apr-15-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A.No. 201 of 2013. ----- Jaymangal Hazra @ Jai Mangal Hazra Petitioner. Versus The State of Jharkhand Opposite Party. . ..... Coram : The Hon'ble Mr. Justice Prashant Kumar. ----- For the Petitioner : Sri. Sanjay Prasad For the State : Ms. Niki Sinha, A.P.P. ----- 03/15.04.2013. Anticipatory bail application filed by Jaymangal Hazra @ Jai Mangal Hazra is moved by Sri. Sanjay Prasad, learned counsel for the petitioner and opposed by Ms. Niki Sinha, Addl P.P. for the State. At paragraph no.6 of the complaint petition, it is alleged that petitioner assaulted informant due to that she received fracture injury on her hand, which was treated by Dr. Vijay Agrawal. In the case diary the injury report issued by Dr. Vijay Agrawal has been enclosed, which shows no fracture injury on the hand of complainant. Doctor further stated that she received injury on her hand due to fall. Considering the aforesaid fact and circumstance, I allow this application a...
Karam Nath Turi Vs. the State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Apr-15-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No. 4253 o1. Karam Nath Turi 2. Pandey Yadav 3. Jeetu Bediya @ Jeetu Bedia @ Jitu Bediya @ Jittu Bediya ... Petitioners -V e r s u s- The State of Jharkhand & Another ... Opposite Parties CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE PRASHANT KUMAR. For the Petitioners : - Mr. H.K. Shikarwar, Advocate For the State : - Mr. Prem Prakash, A.P.P. 05/15.04.2013 From perusal of antecedent report at Flag-'A', it appears that the antecedent report of petitioners Karam Nath Turi, Pandey Yadav and Jeetu Bediya @ Jeetu Bedia @ Jitu Bediya @ Jittu Bediya, have not been received. Under the said circumstance, Superintendent of Police, Ramgarh is directed to send the antecedent report within one week from today. Put up this case on 29.04.2013. Let this order be given to Sri Prem Prakash, learned Additional P.P. for its onward communication to the Superintendent of Police, Ramgarh. ( Prashant Kumar, J.) sunil/...
Ghasi Ram Munda Vs. State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Apr-15-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No.530 of 2013 Ghasi Ram Munda ..... Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand . Opposite Party CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE H.C. MISHRA For the Petitioner : Mr. Rajiv Lochan For the State : A. P.P. ----- 6/15.4.2013 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. Petitioner has been made accused for the offence under Sections 417/376/306 of the Indian Penal Code in connection with Kuchai P.S. Case No.16 of 2012, corresponding to G.R. No.371 of 2012. There is direct allegation against the petitioner to have sexually exploited the lady and to have taken money from her on the false pretest of marrying her, and to have married another lady, due to which she committed suicide. In the facts and circumstances of the case, I am not inclined to release the petitioner Ghasi Ram Munda on bail. Accordingly, prayer for bail stands dismissed. (H. C. Mishra, J) R.Kumar...
- ‹ Prev
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 9
- 10
- 11
- 12
- 13
- Next ›
- Last »