Rajesh Kumar Singh Vs. State of Jharkhand

Rajesh Kumar Singh vs State of Jharkhand

Type Court Judgment Court Jharkhand Decided Apr 15, 2013

~1 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/972080

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/972080
Court: Jharkhand High Court
Decided On: Apr 15, 2013
Subject: Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue: Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Rajesh Kumar Singh

Respondent

State of Jharkhand

Excerpt

inthehighcourtofjharkhandatranchi b.a.no.2177of2013 rajeshkumarsingh petitioner versus thestateofjharkhand oppositeparty coram: honblemr.justiced.n.upadhyay forthepetitioner :m/saltmashkhan&santosh,advocates forthestate :a.p .p. 04/15.04.2013 heardlearnedcounselfortheparties. thepetitionerisaccusedinacaseregisteredundersections419,420, 406&120b/34oftheindianpenalcode. it reveals from the complaint that the accused persons, in a planed manner,cheatedthecomplainantandotheraggrieved. theyhavepretended themselvestobethedirectorandemployeeofm/ssmoothagroorganicltd. companyandaskedthecomplainantandotherwitnessestodepositmoneyfor gettingfranchisesandtheywouldgetcommissionagainstsupplyoffoodgrains amongstthevillagers. it is submitted that the petitioner did not receive money from the complainantorotherwitnesses.hehasbeenimplicatedinthiscasebecausehe wasworkingforthatcompanyandheisrottinginjailcustodysinceaboutsix months. learnedcounselappearingforthestateopposedtheprayerforbail. consideringtheperiodofdetentionofpetitioner,heisdirectedto be releasedonbailonfurnishingbailbondofrs.10,000/(rupeestenthousand) withtwosuretiesofthelikeamounteachtothesatisfactionofthecourtof learnedchiefjudicialmagistrate,dhanbadinconnectionwithdhanbad(bank more)p.s.caseno.830of2011correspondingtog.r.caseno.3389of2011. (d.n.upadhyay,j.) nkc

Full Judgment

INTHEHIGHCOURTOFJHARKHANDATRANCHI B.A.No.2177of2013 RajeshKumarSingh Petitioner Versus TheStateofJharkhand OppositeParty CORAM: HONBLEMR.JUSTICED.N.UPADHYAY ForthePetitioner :M/sAltmashKhan&Santosh,Advocates FortheState :A.P .P. 04/15.04.2013 Heardlearnedcounselfortheparties. ThepetitionerisaccusedinacaseregisteredunderSections419,420, 406&120B/34oftheIndianPenalCode. It reveals from the complaint that the accused persons, in a planed manner,cheatedthecomplainantandotheraggrieved. Theyhavepretended themselvestobethedirectorandemployeeofM/sSmoothAgroOrganicLtd. Companyandaskedthecomplainantandotherwitnessestodepositmoneyfor gettingfranchisesandtheywouldgetcommissionagainstsupplyoffoodgrains amongstthevillagers. It is submitted that the petitioner did not receive money from the complainantorotherwitnesses.Hehasbeenimplicatedinthiscasebecausehe wasworkingforthatcompanyandheisrottinginjailcustodysinceaboutsix months. LearnedcounselappearingfortheStateopposedtheprayerforbail. Consideringtheperiodofdetentionofpetitioner,heisdirectedto be releasedonbailonfurnishingbailbondofRs.10,000/(RupeesTenThousand) withtwosuretiesofthelikeamounteachtothesatisfactionoftheCourtof learnedChiefJudicialMagistrate,DhanbadinconnectionwithDhanbad(Bank more)P.S.CaseNo.830of2011correspondingtoG.R.CaseNo.3389of2011. (D.N.Upadhyay,J.) NKC

Same Court & Year Jharkhand · 2013 Same Parties Rajesh Kumar Singh vs State of Jharkhand Same Subject Education