Jharkhand Court April 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
SamsuddIn Ansari Vs. the State of Jharkhand and anr
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Apr-15-2013
In the High Court of Jharkhand at Ranchi Cr.M.P. No.48 of 2013 Samsuddin Ansari ..............................................Petitioner VERSUS The State of Jharkhand and another ...........Opposite Parties CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.R.PRASAD For the Petitioner :Mr. Mahesh Tiwary For the State :A.P.P 4.15.4.13. Having heard learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and learned counsel appearing for the State, I am not inclined to interfere with the order passed on 13.6.2012 by the Sub-divisional Magistrate, Barhi in case no.26 of 2012 for the reason that the order passed under Section 144 of the Code of Criminal Procedure has already lost its force. Accordingly, this application stands dismissed. However, any finding recorded with respect to title or possession of the first party shall not be binding upon the petitioner. (R.R.Prasad, J.) ND/...
Samuel Mumru ? Salo Murmu Vs. State of Jharkhand and ors.
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Apr-15-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND,RANCHI. W.P(C)No. 5162 of 2005 Samuel Murmu @Salo Murmu ................................. Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand &Ors. . ...............................Respondents For the Petitioner : None For the Respondent-State : Mr. Shyam Narsaria J.C to S.C(L &C) CORAM :- HONBLE MR. JUSTICE P.P.BHATT . . Order No. 2 Dated 15th April,2013 The present petitioner by way of filing this writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India has prayed for quashing the order dated 1.8.2005 passed by the Deputy Commissioner, Sahibganj (Respondent no.2) in R.M.P No. 27 of 2004-05 whereby the learned Deputy Commissioner decided that Baha Murmu (Respondent no.4) is entitled to the half share of the land in question during her life time for maintaining herself and that she will not sell the same without permission of the court. Heard the learned counsel for the Respondent-State Government. The learned counsel for the petitioner, despite given reasonable...
Abid Ali Vs. the State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Apr-15-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No.10296 of 2012 Abid Ali ..... Petitioner with B.A. No.198 of 2013 Aslam Khan ..... Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand . Opposite Party CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE H.C. MISHRA For the Petitioners : Mr. Indrajeet Sinha For the State : A. P.P. For the Informant : Mr. Pandey Ashok Nath Roy ----- 6/15.4.2013 Both these applications arise out of the same case, as such, they are being disposed of by this common order. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the State as also learned counsel for the Complainant-Informant. Petitioners have been made accused for the offence under Sections 406/420/34 of the Indian Penal Code in connection with Bistupur P.S. Case No.371 of 2012, corresponding to G.R. No.3331 of 2012 The complaint was filed by one Samsher Ali, wherein he has alleged that the petitioners and the complainant entered into an agreement on 12.2.2008 for sale of a shop in the premises of Tisco Friends Co-operat...
Bir Singh Champia Vs. State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Apr-15-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr. Appeal (DB) No. 469 of 2011 Bir Singh Champia Appellant Versus The State of Jharkhand ... ... ... Respondent ------ CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D. N. PATEL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. CHANDRASHEKHAR ----- For the Appellant: Mr. R.P. Gupta For the Respondent: Mr. P.K. Sahay, A.P.P. ------ 13/Dated: April, 15, 2013 Per D.N. Patel, J1) This appeal has already been admitted and record and proceedings of Sessions Trial No.12 of 2008 was called for from the trial Court. This Court has received record and proceedings of Sessions Trial No.12 of 2008. The record and proceedings is placed along with this Criminal Appeal and we have perused the record and proceedings of the Sessions Trial.2) Counsel for the appellant, who is original accused No.1 in the Sessions Trial, has submitted that he is not pressing his prayer for suspension of sentence at this stage.3) In view of this submission, prayer for suspension of sentence is not granted. (D. N. Patel, J) (S. ...
Court on Its Own Motion Vs. Hari Prasad Sah
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Apr-15-2013
INTHEHIGHCOURTOFJHARKHANDATRANCHI Contempt(Criminal)CaseNo.3of2013 Courtonitsownmotion Petitioner Versus HariPrasadSah Respondent CORAM: HONBLEMR.JUSTICED.N.PATEL HON'BLEMR.JUSTICESHREECHANDRASHEKHAR FortheAppellant : Ms.AnubhaRawatChoudhary,AmicusCuriae FortheRespondent: Mr.R.S.Mazumdar,Sr.Advocate 05/Dated:15 th April,2013 PerD.N.Patel,J.:1. ThepresentcasehasbeenregisteredinthisHighCourtbecauseof thereferencemadebytheJudicialMagistrate,1st Class,Hazaribagdated 5thDecember,2012.2. We have heard learned counsel for the contemnor and also the learnedAmicusCuriae.Theyhavearguedthecaseindetailandsubmitted thatthepoliceofficerwhowasinchargeoftheinvestigationhadpreferred anapplicationforgettingproductionwarrantsofsixaccusedwhowerein judicialcustodyinsomedifferentoffences.Thisapplicationwasgivenon 11th April,2012.Thematterwasthereafteradjournedfor15th May,2012 and, thereafter, the matter was again adjourned for 23rd May, 2012. Productionwarrantwasnotgiventothepoliceandthepolicehastorecord in...
Shyam Kishore Choudhary Alias S K Choudhary Vs. State of Jharkhand and ...
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Apr-15-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr. M. P. No. 150 of 2013 Shyam Kishore Choudhary @ S.K. Choudhary Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand and another Opp. Parties ----- CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE R.R. PRASAD ----- For the Petitioner : Mr. Anup Kr. Mehta, Advocate For the State : A.P.P. ----- 2/15.04.2013 Since this case arises out of complaint, the complainant has been impleaded as opposite party no. 2 but issuing notice to the opposite party no. 2 would cause delay in disposal of the case and since the nature of the order, which is being passed, is as such, which would never cause any prejudice to the opposite party no. 2, this matter is being disposed of in absence of opposite party no.2. The instant application is directed against the order dated 2.1.2013 passed in I.D. Case No. 01 of 1881, whereby and whereunder, an application filed under Section 317 Cr.P.C. on behalf of the petitioner was rejected and then the warrant of arrest was ordered to be issued against him. Mr. ...
Pankaj Kumar Vs. Police
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Apr-15-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(S) No.5722 of 2012 Pankaj Kumar .......... Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand & Ors. .......... Respondents ------ CORAM : HONBLE MR. JUSTICE NARENDRA NATH TIWARI ------ For the petitioner : Mr. Ajay Kr. Pathak, Advocate For the State : J.C. to A.G. ------ 5/15.04.2013: The petitioner claims to have been selected for the post of Police Driver after passing through the physical test, driving test and written examination held by the Palamau Selection Board. According to the petitioner, till date appointment letter has not been issued to him, though others selected in the same process have been appointed to the post of Police Driver. The petitioner made request and filed representation before the concerned authority, but no order has been passed till date. Learned J.C. to A.G., appearing on behalf of the respondents, opposed the petitioner's prayer and submitted that the petitioner has not been found eligible for the post and, thus, ther...
Kartik Tiwari Vs. Human Resource Development
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Apr-15-2013
INTHEHIGHCOURTOFJHARKHANDATRANCHI W.P.(S).No.7244of2012 KartikTiwari. .Petitioner. Versus TheStateofJharkhand&Ors. ....Respondents. CORAM:HONBLEMR.JUSTICENARENDRANATHTIWARI ForthePetitioner : Mr.ManojTandan,Advocate FortheState : J.C.toAAG 08/15.04.2013: Learned J.C. to AAG prays for two weeks' time to file specificaffidavitshowingwhetherpetitioner'sappointmentwas within the limited unit meant for Dhanbad district, if not, then underwhichpolicyorprocedure,thepetitionerhasbeenpicked andsoughttobedisplacedfromthatdistrict. Prayerisallowed. Putupthiscaseon14thMay,2013. Till then, interim order dated 30th January, 2013 shall continue. (NarendraNathTiwari,J.) Sanjay/...
Rohit Kumar Sahu Vs. the State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Apr-15-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND, RANCHI Cr. M. P. No. 352 of 2013 Rohit Kumar Sahu ..... Petitioner(s) Versus The State of Jharkhand . Opp. Party(s) CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE R. R. PRASAD For the Petitioner(s) : Mr. K. S. Nanda, Advocate. For the State : Mr. Prem Prakash, A.P.P. ----- 02 / 15.04.2013. Heard learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. Mr. Nanda, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that while the petitioner was riding on a Motorcycle bearing Registration not JH 07.2476, it was intercepted by the Police and on search being made, the petitioner was found in possession of fire-arm and on that allegation as well as on the allegation that the petitioner was making preparation of committing dacoity, a case was registered under the Arms Act as well as under Section 399 I.P.C. When the petitioner was admitted to bail, an application for release of the vehicle was also filed which was rejected simply for the reason that Engine N...
Smt.Gouri Banerjee Vs. State of Jharkhand and anr.
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Apr-15-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI. W.P. (C) No. 6514 of 2010 Smt. Gouri Banerjee Petitioner -V e r s u s- State of Jharkhand & Anr. Respondents. CORAM: - HONBLE MR. JUSTICE P.P. BHATT. For the Petitioner : - M/s. Indrajit Sinha & Bibhash Sinha, Advocates. For the State : - Mr. Md. Shamim Akhtar, S.C. (Mines). 07/15.04.2013 The petitioner by way of the present petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India has prayed for issuance of an appropriate writ/order/direction for quashing and setting aside the order and judgment dated 16.09.2010 passed by the learned 1st Additional District & Sessions Judge, Jamshedpur in Misc. Appeal No. 4 of 2010, whereby the Misc. Appeal preferred against the order dated 31st March, 2010, passed by the learned Sub Judge I, Jamshedpur in Title Suit No. 143 of 2009 was rejected. The said Appeal was preferred against the application filed under Order XXXIX Rule 1 and 2 of the Code of Civil Procedure seeking grant of temporary injunction against ...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »