SamsuddIn Ansari Vs. the State of Jharkhand and anr - Court Judgment

Excerpt:

in the high court of jharkhand at ranchi cr.m.p. no.48 of 2013 samsuddin ansari ..............................................petitioner versus the state of jharkhand and another ...........opposite parties coram: hon'ble mr. justice r.r.prasad for the petitioner :mr. mahesh tiwary for the state :a.p.p 4.15.4.13. having heard learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and learned counsel appearing for the state, i am not inclined to interfere with the order passed on 13.6.2012 by the sub-divisional magistrate, barhi in case no.26 of 2012 for the reason that the order passed under section 144 of the code of criminal procedure has already lost its force. accordingly, this application stands dismissed. however, any finding recorded with respect to title or possession of the first party shall not be binding upon the petitioner. (r.r.prasad, j.) nd/

Judgment:

In the High Court of Jharkhand at Ranchi Cr.M.P. No.48 of 2013 Samsuddin Ansari ..............................................Petitioner VERSUS The State of Jharkhand and another ...........Opposite Parties CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.R.PRASAD For the Petitioner :Mr. Mahesh Tiwary For the State :A.P.P 4.15.4.13. Having heard learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and learned counsel appearing for the State, I am not inclined to interfere with the order passed on 13.6.2012 by the Sub-divisional Magistrate, Barhi in case no.26 of 2012 for the reason that the order passed under Section 144 of the Code of Criminal Procedure has already lost its force. Accordingly, this application stands dismissed. However, any finding recorded with respect to title or possession of the first party shall not be binding upon the petitioner. (R.R.Prasad, J.) ND/