Jharkhand Court April 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Rajnish Kumar Vs. the State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Apr-15-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No. 3962 o1. Rajnish Kumar 2. Md. Yusuf Siddique ... Petitioners -V e r s u s- The State of Jharkhand & Another ... Opposite Parties CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE PRASHANT KUMAR. For the Petitioners : - Mr. Indrajit Sinha, Advocate For the State : - Mr. P.K. Jaiswal, A.P.P. For the O.P. No. 2 : - Mr. Manoj Kr. Das, Advocate. 06/15.04.2013 Anticipatory bail application filed by Rajnish Kumar and Md. Yusuf Siddique, in connection with C/1 Case No. 2023 of 2009, pending in the court of Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Jamshedpur, is moved by Sri Indrajit Sinha, learned counsel for the petitioner and opposed by Sri P.K. Jaiswal, learned Additional P.P. for the State and Sri Manoj Kumar Das, learned counsel for the opposite party no.2. Admittedly, petitioner no. 1 took loan from the Central Bank of India on the basis of equitable mortgage of the land of the complainant. It is alleged that complainant has no knowledge regarding the same. It also app...
Sanjay Prasad and anr Vs. Central Coalfields Limited and ors
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Apr-15-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.S. No.3234 of 2012 Sanjay Prasad & Anr. ..Petitioners Versus Central Coalfields Limited & Ors. .Respondents ----- Coram:HONBLE MR. JUSTICE NARENDRA NATH TIWARI For the Petitioners : Mr. A.K. Yadav, Advocate For the Respondents : Mr. Arbind Kumar, Advocate ---- I.A. No. 1965/2013 07/15-04-2013 In this I.A., the petitioners have prayed for fixing an early date of hearing of W.P.S. No. 3234 of 2012. It has been stated that writ petition filed by the petitioners relates to employment. The petitioners are unemployed persons and they are waiting for employment since long. Due to arbitrary discrimination of the respondents, they could not be appointed and others have been appointed. If the writ petition is not heard earlier, the petitioners may become overage. Learned counsel for the respondents has no objection in fixing an early date of hearing of W.P.S. No.3234 of 2012. Considering the nature of the writ petition and the ground taken by the peti...
Sudan Singh Vs. State of Jharkhand and anr
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Apr-15-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND, RANCHI Cr. M. P. No. 348 of 2013 Sudan Singh ..... Petitioner(s) Versus 1.The State of Jharkhand 2. Dilip Kumar Jha . Opp. Party(s) CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE R. R. PRASAD For the Petitioner(s) : Mr. Shailesh, Advocate. For the State : Mr. Amitabh, A.P.P. ----- 02 / 15.04.2013. As prayed for, let this matter be listed next Tuesday i.e. 23.04.2013 so that supplementary affidavit be filed. At the same time, the opposite party No.2 would be at liberty to file counter-affidavit. Let a copy of the petition be handed-over to the learned counsel appearing for the opposite party No.2. (R. R. Prasad, J.) Sandeep/...
Kaushal Kumar Mishra Vs. the State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Apr-15-2013
INTHEHIGHCOURTOFJHARKHANDATRANCHI B.A.No.2193of2013 KaushalKumarMishra Petitioner Versus TheStateofJharkhand OppositeParty CORAM: HONBLEMR.JUSTICED.N.UPADHYAY ForthePetitioner :Mr.SanjayKumarTiwari,Advocate FortheState :A.P .P. 05/15.04.2013 Heardlearnedcounselfortheparties. ThepetitionerisaccusedinacaseregisteredunderSections302&120B oftheIndianPenalCode. Itrevealsfromthewrittenreportthatdeadbodyofthehusbandofthe informantwasfoundlyinginaroomofhotelMahajanwherethedeceasedwas workingasaManager.Duringinvestigationitwasdetectedthattheroomwas arrangedattherequestofpresentpetitionerfortheotheraccused. Itissubmittedthatarrangingaroomforanycustomerisnooffence.No directorcircumstantialevidencehasbeencollectedinthecasediary. LearnedcounselappearingfortheStateopposedtheprayerforbail. Considering the facts and circumstances as pointed out above, the petitioner is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/(RupeesTenThousand)withtwosuretiesofthelikeamounteachto thesatisf...
Dina Nath Singh Vs. the State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Apr-15-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A.No. 63 of 2013. ----- Dina Nath Singh Petitioner. Versus The State of Jharkhand Opposite Party. . ..... Coram : The Hon'ble Mr. Justice Prashant Kumar. ----- For the Petitioner : Sri. Indrajit Sinha For the State : Sri.T.N. Verma, A.P.P. ----- 03/15.04.2013. Anticipatory bail application filed by Dina Nath Singh is moved by Sri. Indrajit Sinha, learned counsel for the petitioner and opposed by Sri. T.N. Verma , Addl P.P. for the State. It is alleged that petitioner is a District Engineer of Zila Parishad, Chaibasa and he gave advance to the Assistant Engineer for execution of MNREGA scheme. It is further alleged that there is no provision for giving advance under the MNREGA scheme. In another case i.e. A.B.A. No. 2411/2001 detailed counter affidavit filed. Said case has been disposed of on 9th April, 2013 taking into account that in MNREGA rules, there is no provision which prohibits District Engineer for giving advance to Assistant Engine...
Umang Kejriwal and ors Vs. State of Jharkhand and ors
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Apr-15-2013
In the High Court of Jharkhand at Ranchi Cr.M.P. No.101 o1. Umang Kejriwal 2. Rama Shankar Singh 3. Chandra Prakash Pandey 4. Vilas Vishnu Jamnis ..............................Petitioners VERSUS The State of Jharkhand and others ...........Opposite Parties CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.R.PRASAD For the Petitioners :Mr. Indrajit Sinha For the State :A.P.P 2.15.4.13. Learned counsel appearing for the State accepts notice on behalf of opposite parties 2 and 3. As prayed for, let this matter be listed on 7.5.2013 so that counter affidavit be filed. Meanwhile, no coercive action shall be taken against the petitioners in B.F. Case no.08 of 2010, pending in the court of Sub-divisional Judicial Magistrate, Bokaro. (R.R.Prasad, J.) ND/...
Shivbhawan Singh Vs. State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Apr-15-2013
INTHEHIGHCOURTOFJHARKHANDATRANCHI Cr.Appeal(DB)No.1075of2012 ShivbhawanSingh .......Appellant Vs. TheStateofJharkhand Respondent CORAM: HONBLEMR.JUSTICED.N.PATEL HONBLEMR.JUSTICESHREECHANDRASHEKHAR. FortheAppellant:Mr.A.K.Chaturvedy,Advocate FortheState :Mr.M.B.Lal,A.P.P. 08/Dated:15 th April,2013 Oralorder: PerD.N.Patel,J.:1. The present criminal appeal has already been Admitted vide order dated18thMarch,2013andtherecordandproceedingsofSessionsTrialNo. 33of2009wascalledfromthetrialcourtsoastoappreciatethearguments for suspension of sentence awarded by the trial court to the present appellantaccused.2. Recordandproceedingsofthetrialcourthasbeenreceivedbythis Courtandwehaveperusedthesame.Thisappellanthasbeenpunishedfor life imprisonment for the offence of murder of his wife. The murder has takenplaceinthehouseoftheappellant.3. Havingheardcounselforboththesidesandlookingtotheevidences onrecord,itappearsthatthereisaprimafaciecaseagainstthisappellant accused.Asthecriminalappealispending,we...
Amit Singh Vs. State of Jharkhand and anr
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Apr-15-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr. M. P. No. 121 of 2013 Amit Singh @ Amit Kr. Singh Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand and another Opp. Parties ----- CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE R.R. PRASAD ----- For the Petitioner : Mr. D.K. Dubey, Advocate For the State : A.P.P. ----- 2/15.04.2013 Issue notice under registered post with acknowledgment due to the opposite party no. 2 to show cause as to why this application be not admitted and/or if possible be disposed of at the stage of admission itself. Requisites etc. must be filed by Friday. Let this case be listed under the same heading on appearance of opposite party no. 2 or on receipt of the service report. Until further orders, no coercive action shall be taken against petitioner- Amit Singh @ Amit Kr. Singh in connection with Complaint Case No. 1438 of 2010 pending in the court of Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Ranchi. (R.R. Prasad, J.) AKT...
Smt Sunita Vs. State of Jharkhand and anr
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Apr-15-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND, RANCHI Cr. M. P. No. 261 of 2013 Smt. Sunita ..... Petitioner(s) Versus 1.The State of Jharkhand 2. Chhotu Lohar . Opp. Party(s) CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE R. R. PRASAD For the Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ashok Kumar Yadav, Advocate. For the State : M/s Anita Sinha, A.P.P. ----- 02 /15.04.2013 . Let notice be issued to the opposite party No.2, for which, requisites etc., under Registered cover AD must be filed by Monday i.e. 22.04.2013. On appearance of the opposite party No.2, list this case under the heading For Admission. Until further order, no coercive action shall be taken against the petitioner- Smt. Sunita, in connection with Sonari P.S. Case No.122 of 2012 [Complaint Case No.2387 of 2012], presently pending in the court of learned Judicial Magistrate [K. M. Prasad], 1st Class, Jamshedpur or its successor court shall remain stayed. (R. R. Prasad, J.) Sandeep/...
Uma Shankar Yadav Vs. the State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Apr-15-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No.336 of 2013 Uma Shankar Yadav ..... Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand . Opposite Party CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE H.C. MISHRA For the Petitioner : Mr. Deepak Kumar For the State : A. P.P. ----- 3/15.4.2013 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State. Petitioner has been made accused for the offence under Sections 341/323/307/379/504/34 of the Indian Penal Code in connection with Jainagar P.S. Case No.134 of 2012, corresponding to G.R. No.881 of 2012. There appears to be dispute between the parties and there is allegation against the petitioner and other co-accused to have assaulted and injured the persons on the informants side. In the facts and circumstances of the case, I am inclined to release the petitioner on bail. Accordingly, the petitioner Uma Shankar Yadav is directed to be released on bail, on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of like amount each to ...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »