Jharkhand Court February 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Mahboob Sk Vs. the State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Feb-05-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 489 of 2013 Mahboob Sk. ..... Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand . Opposite Party CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE H. C. MISHRA For the Petitioner :Mr. Raja Ravi Shekhar Singh For the State :A. P.P. ----- 04/05.02.2013 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the Prosecution. Petitioner has been made accused for the offence under Sections 341, 324, 326, 307/34 of the Indian Penal Code, in connection with Rajmahal (Radhanager) P.S. Case No. 125 of 2012, corresponding to G.R. No. 233 of 2012, S. C. No. 225 of 2012. There is allegation against the petitioner and the other co- accused persons to have assaulted and injured the brother of the informant. Taking into consideration the allegation against the petitioner, I am inclined to release the petitioner on bail. Accordingly, the petitioner Mahboob Sk. is directed to be released on bail, on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of ...
Lakhpati Alias Shakunti Alias Shobhanti Vs. the State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Feb-05-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 1110 of 2013 With B.A. No. 398 of 2013 Lakhpati @ Shakunti @ Shobhanti Petitioner (in B.A. No. 1110/2013) 1. Lakhpati @ Shakunti @ Shobhanti @ Lakhpati Kumari 2. Sunita @ Nandani @ Sunita Kumari ... Petitioners (In B.A. No. 398 of 2013) Versus The State of Jharkhand ... Opposite Party (in both cases) --- CORAM : HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE JAYA ROY For the Petitioner : Mr. Kishore Kr. Mishra, Advocate For the State : A. P. P. 02/05.02.2013 The office is directed to issue notice to the Dwarika Oraon, who is the father of the present petitioner accused in Manika P.S. Case No. 70 of 2012 corresponding to G.R. No. 508 of 2012 resident of village Juru, P.S.- Lesliganj, District Palamau (Jharkhand) who sworn the affidavit of this application, to appear before this Court on 19.02.2013 and to file show cause explaining how he has sworn this affidavit in B.A. No. 1110 of 2013 for his son and stated that the petitioner, namely Lakhpati @ Shakunti @ Shob...
Nanku Yadav Vs. the State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Feb-05-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 185 of 2013 Nanku Yadav .... Petitioner(s) Versus State of Jharkhand ... Opposite Party Coram : HONBLE MR. JUSTICE D.N.UPADHYAY For the petitioner (s): Mr.B.K.Dubey For the opposite party : Addl.P.P. 05.02.2013 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel for the State. Petitioner is accused in connection with Bashishth Nagar PS case No. 61 of 2009 for the offence registered under sections 147/148/149/436/395 of the Indian Penal Code and section 27 of the Arms Act and sections 3 /4 of the Explosive Substance Act. According to prosecution case, MCC extremists, who were about 150 in number, surrounded the house of the informant and pulled the inmates out and looted household articles. The accused persons had also planted bomb in the wall and exploded the house. Some part of the house was also set ablaze. It is submitted that there is specific allegation against Doman who has been granted bail vide BA No. 3443 of 2011. ...
Rapaz Chanda Kiskoo Vs. State of Jharkhand and anr.
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Feb-05-2013
INTHEHIGHCOURTOFJHARKHANDATRANCHI Cr.M.PNo.1626of2007 RapazChandaKiskoo.............. Petitioner Versus StateofJharkhand&Anr Opp.Parties Coram: HonbleMr.JusticeR.R.Prasad ForthePetitioner :Mr.JaiPrakashJha,Sr.Advocate Mr. Shree Prakash Jha, Advocate FortheState :Mr.APP ForO.P.No.2 :Mr.S.K.Dubey,Advocate 9./05.02.2013 Heardlearnedseniorcounselappearingforthepetitioner,learned counselforO.P.No.2andthelearnedcounselfortheState. This application has been filed for quashing of the order dated 17/09/2007,passedbythethenJudicialMagistrate,1stClass,Jamtara,in P.C.R.CaseNo.128of2007,wherebyandwhereundercognizanceofthe offencepunishableunderSection420oftheIndianPenalCodehasbeen takenagainstthepetitioner. It is the case of the complainant that when this petitioner representedtothecomplainantthatifRs.2lakhsarepaidtohimapetrol pumpdealershipofIndianOilCorporationatNalawouldbeallottedtoher. On such assurance, Rs. 2 lakhs was paid to the petitioner but she was never allotted any petrol pump by the In...
Amal Kanti Nag and ors Vs. Union of India and ors
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Feb-05-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.S. No. 6846 of 2011 Amal Kanti Nag & Others ..Petitioners Versus Union of India & Others .Respondents ----- Coram:HONBLE MR. JUSTICE NARENDRA NATH TIWARI For the Petitioners : Mr. Abhinesh Kumar, Advocate For the Respondents :Mr. M. Prasad, Advocate ----- I.A. No. 56/2013 05/05.02.2013 In this I.A., the petitioners have prayed for amendment in the writ petition. It has been stated that the respondents have filed counter affidavit and brought on record the office memorandum dated 26.11.2008 issued by the Ministry of Heavy Industries & Public Enterprises and also the Circular dated 2.9.2010 issued by the Director, Personnel (Respondent no. 4), whereby the gratuity limit from Rs.3.5 lacs to 10 lacs has been restricted to board level and below board level officers and non- unionized employees/supervisors only. It has been submitted that the said letter/circular is discriminatory, arbitrary and illegal and the same has been cited in the counter a...
Raja Khan Alias Imran Khan Vs. State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Feb-05-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A. B.A. No. 149 of 2013 Raja Khan @ Imran Khan .... Petitioner Vs. The State of Jharkhand ..... .... Opposite party CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRASHANT KUMAR For the Petitioner : Mrs. Dr. Amita Srivastava For the State : Mr. P.K. Sahay , APP 3/05.02.2013: Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this anticipatory bail application. Permission accorded. Accordingly, this anticipatory bail application is dismissed as withdrawn. ( Prashant Kumar,J.) Sharda/-...
Taruna Devi and anr Vs. State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Feb-05-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI. A.B.A.No. 4286 of 2012 ----- 1. Taruna Devi 2. Santosh Kumar Paswan Petitioners. Versus State of Jharkhand Opp.party . ------ Coram : The Hon'ble Mr. Justice Prashant Kumar. ----- For the Petitioner : Sri. A.K.Sahani. For the State : Smt. Niki Sinha, APP ----- 02/05.02. 2013. After some argument, learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission to withdraw this application with liberty to file regular bail in the court below and raise all the points taken in this bail application. Permission accorded. With the aforesaid liberty, this anticipatory bail application is dismissed as withdrawn. ( Prashant Kumar,J.) Raman/...
Pramod Lakra Vs. Chief Secretory
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Feb-05-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI WP(C) No. 438 of 2013 Pramod Lakra Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand 2. The Chief Secretary, Govt. of Jharkhand 3. The Deputy Commissioner, Ranchi 4. The Special Area Regulation officer, Ranchi 5. The Senior Superintendent of Police, Ranchi.6. The Officer Incharge, Lalpur Police Station 7. Saiyad Md. Shahid Jamal Respondents --- CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE P.P.BHATT For the Petitioners : M/sRamawatar Choubey, Santosh Kumar, Adv. For the Respondents : Mr. Srijit Choudhary, Adv. --- Order No.04 Dated 05th February, 2013. Learned counsel appearing for the respondents submits that he has filed a counter affidavit on behalf of respondent No. 6 stating, inter alia, that in pursuance of order dated 26.7.12 passed by SAR Court, the petitioner filed an application on 12.1.2013 and for compliance of the order of the learned SAR court, immediately one A.S.I., namely Simon Soy was deputed to stop the construction work and accordingly the ASI along w...
Manan Safique Ansari Alias Md Manan Safi and Anothers Vs. the State of ...
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Feb-05-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A. B.A. No. 4278 o1. Manan Safique Ansari @ Md. Manan Safi @ Md. Memrem Safi 2. Tohid Ansari @ Md. Tohid Ansari .... Petitioners Vs. The State of Jharkhand & Anr ..... .... Opposite parties CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRASHANT KUMAR For the Petitioners : Mr. Shobhakar Mishra For the State : Mr. V.K. Tiwary , APP 2/05.02.2013: It is submitted that land in question belongs to petitioners. Under the said circumstances, petitioners are directed to implead the complainant as O.P. No.2. Issue notice to O.P. No. 2 through registered post with A/D as well as by ordinary process for which requisites etc. must be filed within one week, failing which this application as against concerned O.Ps shall stand rejected without further reference to a Bench. In the meantime, petitioners shall not be arrested in connection with C.P. Case No. 22 of 2011 pending in the court of J.M., 1st Class, Bokaro. ( Prashant Kumar,J.) Sharda/-...
Bhagirath Yadav Vs. the State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Feb-05-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A.No. 4287 of 2012 ----- Bhagirath Yadav Petitioner. Versus The State of Jharkhand Opposite Party. . ..... Coram : The Hon'ble Mr. Justice Prashant Kumar. ----- For the Petitioner : Sri. A.K. Sinha No.4 For the State : Sri.A.K. Prasad, A.P.P. ----- 04/05.02.2013. Anticipatory bail application filed by Bhagirath Yadav is moved by Sri. A.K.Sinha No.4 , learned counsel for the petitioner and opposed by Sri. A.K. Prasad , Addl P.P. for the State. This is a case under sections 341,323,324,307 and 540/34 of the IPC. There is no specific allegation agaisnt the petitioner. Considering the aforesaid fact and circumstance, I allow this application and direct the petitioner, named above, to surrender in the court below by 14.02.2013. If petitioner surrenders by that time, the court below is directed to enlarge the petitioner, named above, on bail, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/-(ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the sat...
- ‹ Prev
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- 12
- 13
- 15
- 16
- Next ›
- Last »