Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Taruna Devi and anr Vs. State of Jharkhand

Taruna Devi and anr vs State of Jharkhand

Type Court Judgment Court Jharkhand Decided Feb 05, 2013
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/971593

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Jharkhand High Court
Decided On
Subject
Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue
Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Taruna Devi and anr

Respondent

State of Jharkhand

Excerpt

in the high court of jharkhand at ranchi. a.b.a.no. 4286 of 2012 ----- 1. taruna devi 2. santosh kumar paswan petitioners. versus state of jharkhand opp.party . ------ coram : the hon'ble mr. justice prashant kumar. ----- for the petitioner : sri. a.k.sahani. for the state : smt. niki sinha, app ----- 02/05.02. 2013. after some argument, learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission to withdraw this application with liberty to file regular bail in the court below and raise all the points taken in this bail application. permission accorded. with the aforesaid liberty, this anticipatory bail application is dismissed as withdrawn. ( prashant kumar,j.) raman/

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI. A.B.A.No. 4286 of 2012 ----- 1. Taruna Devi 2. Santosh Kumar Paswan Petitioners. Versus State of Jharkhand Opp.party . ------ Coram : The Hon'ble Mr. Justice Prashant Kumar. ----- For the Petitioner : Sri. A.K.Sahani. For the State : Smt. Niki Sinha, APP ----- 02/05.02. 2013. After some argument, learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission to withdraw this application with liberty to file regular bail in the court below and raise all the points taken in this bail application. Permission accorded. With the aforesaid liberty, this anticipatory bail application is dismissed as withdrawn. ( Prashant Kumar,J.) Raman/

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial