Jharkhand Court February 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Tun Tun Rai Alias Tuntun Kumar Roy Alias Tuntun Singh Vs. State of Jha ...
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Feb-05-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A.No. 4289 of 2012 ----- Tun Tun Rai @ Tuntun Kumar Roy @ Tuntun Singh @ Tuntun Roy Petitioner. Versus The State of Jharkhand Opposite Party. . ..... Coram : The Hon'ble Mr. Justice Prashant Kumar. ----- For the Petitioner : Sri. Ananda Sen For the State : Sri.A.K. Pandey, A.P.P. ----- 02/05.02.2013. Anticipatory bail application filed by Tun Tun Rai @ Tuntun Kumar Roy @ Tuntun Singh @ Tuntun Roy is moved by Sri. Ananda Sen , learned counsel for the petitioner and opposed by Sri. A.K. Pandey , Addl P.P. for the State. This is a case under sections 153/154/174B of the Railway Act. Admittedly offence under sections 153 and 154 of the Railway Act is not made out. It further appears that the derailment took place due to stacking of sand on loop line at Sonua Railway station. It is also an admitted fact that sand was stacked by supplier Esha Khan. Petitioner implicated in this case only because he was doing civil construction work at the platform...
Arup Kumar Chatterjee and anr Vs. Vinoba Bhave University and anr
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Feb-05-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(S) No.4138 of 2011 with I.A. no.485 of 2013 Arup Kumar Chatterjee & Anr. . Petitioners Versus Vinoba Bhave University, Hazaribagh & Anr. ...Respondents Coram : The Honble Mr. Justice Narendra Nath Tiwari For the Petitioners : Mr. S.K.Samanta, Advocate For the Respondents : Mrs.I.Sen Choudhary, Advocate ----- 5/05.02.2013 In I.A. no.485 of 2013, the petitioners have prayed for fixing an early date of hearing of W.P.(S) no.4138 of 2011 and for interim relief for payment of admitted post retiral dues. In view of the nature of the case and with the consent of the parties, the writ petition is itself heard and is being disposed of by this order. In the writ petition, the petitioners have prayed for direction on the respondents to pay their retiral dues as well as service terminal benefits: such as arrears of difference of pay payable on the basis of 5th Pay Revision; arrears of leave encashment; arrears of gratuity and the arrears of pay, which ...
Badli Devi and ors Vs. State of Jharkhand and anr
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Feb-05-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A.No. 4290 of 2012 ----- 1. Badli Devi 2. Usha Devi 3. Alo Devi @ Ala Devi 4. Parwati Modi @ Parbati Devi 5. Chhutni Devi 6. Shankar Modi Petitioners. Versus 1.The State of Jharkhand 2. Keshu Devi Opposite Party. . ..... Coram : The Hon'ble Mr. Justice Prashant Kumar. ----- For the Petitioners : Smt. Vandana Singh For the State : Sri.Tapas Roy, A.P.P. ----- 02/05.02.2013. Anticipatory bail application filed by Badli Devi, Usha Devi, Alo Devi @ Ala Devi, Parwati Modi @ Parbati Devi, Chhutni Devi and Shankar Modi is moved by Smt. Vandana Singh , learned counsel for the petitioners and opposed by Sri. Tapas Roy , Addl P.P. for the State. There is general and omnibus allegations against all the accused persons. No injury report has been filed along with complainant petition. Considering the aforesaid fact and circumstance, I allow this application and direct the petitioners, named above, to surrender in the court below by 14.02.2013. If petition...
Smt Manjula Sinha Vs. Collectariate
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Feb-05-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI WP(C) No. 3865 of 2012 Smt. Manjula Sinha Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand and Ors. Respondents --- CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE P.P.BHATT For the Petitioners : M/s Ayush Aditya, P.Dayal, Debolina Sen, Adv. For the Respondents. : Mr. Md. Shamim Akhtar --- Order No.06 Dated 05th February, 2013. The petitioner, by way of filing the instant writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, has prayed for quashing and setting aside Orders dated 25.4.2011 (Annexure-11) and 6.5.2012 (Annexure-11/A) passed by the Additional Collector, Ranchi and Deputy Commissioner, Ranchi, respectively. Learned counsel for the petitioner by referring the impugned orders pointed out that the order has been passed by the Deputy Commissioner, Ranchi without issuance of any show cause notice and giving any reasonable opportunity of being heard to the petitioner. It is further submitted that by virtue of this order, the Jamabandi has been ordered to be can...
Parmeshwar Sao and ors Vs. the State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Feb-05-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 581 o1. Parmeshwar Sao 2. Mahadeo Sao 3. Wazir Sao 4. Amrit Sao 5. Ramchandra Sao ... ... Petitioners Versus The State of Jharkhand ... ... ... Opposite Party --- CORAM : HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE JAYA ROY For the Petitioners : Mr. Baleshwar Yadav, Advocate For the State : A. P. P. 02/05.02.2013 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the State. Petitioners are accused in a case for the offence registered under Sections 420, 465, 467, 468, 471, 486, 487 and 120(B) of the Indian Penal Code. Learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that the other two co-accused, namely, Bihari Sao and Manoj Das @ Manoja Das have been granted bail by another Bench of this Court in B.A. No. 7839 of 2012 and B.A. No. 7934 of 2012 vide order dated 06.11.2012. It is also submitted that neither the illicit foreign liquors were recovered from their house nor they were apprehended at the spot. It is further contended that the petitio...
Shashi Bhushan Mandal Vs. the State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Feb-05-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A No. 761 of 2013 Shashi Bhushan Mandal......... Petitioner -- Versus -- The State of Jharkhand ...... ......... Opposite Party ---- CORAM: HONBLE MRS. JUSTICE JAYA ROY ---- For the Petitioner : Mr. Pratiush Lala , Advocate For the State : A.P.P. ---- 2/ 05.02.2013 Heard the counsel for petitioner and counsel for the State. The petitioner is accused in this case registered under Sections 414/ 34 of the I.P.C., pending in the court of Judicial Magistrate, Dhanbad. The counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is the driver of the vehicle which has been seized with the loaded stolen coal. It is also submitted that other two persons who were arrested at the spot namely Ayodhya Bhuiyan and Shamshad Hazam have already been granted bail. It is also submitted that the petitioner is in custody from 10.12.2012 i.e. nearly two months. Counsel for the State opposed but not disputed the period of custody of the petitioner. Considering the sub...
Nirmal Kumar Vs. the State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Feb-05-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 502 of 2013 Nirmal Kumar ..... Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand . Opposite Party CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE H. C. MISHRA For the Petitioner :Mr. Ranjeet Kumar Singh For the State :A. P.P. ----- 03/05.02.2013 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the Prosecution. Petitioner has been made accused for the offence under Sections 467, 468, 471, 420, 406, 409, 120(B) of the Indian Penal Code, in connection with Gumla P.S. Case No. 337 of 2011, corresponding to G.R. No. 1110 of 2011. Though the petitioner has been made accused in this case, but it appears that with the same allegation another F.I.R. was earlier lodged against the petitioner which is Basia P. S. Case No. 51 of 2008. Learned counsel for the petitioner has pointed out that in the said case the petitioner has already been granted anticipatory bail and, accordingly, has prayed for bail. The order granting anticipatory bail of the petitioner has been...
Arun Bouri Vs. State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Feb-05-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr. Appeal (S.J.) No. 853 of 2009 Arun Bouri ... ... Appellant Versus The State of Jharkhand ... ... ... Opposite Party --- CORAM : HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE JAYA ROY For the Appellant : Mr. Nitayanand Pd. Choudhary, Advocate For the State : A. P. P. I.A. No. 348 o04. 05.02.2013 Heard learned counsel for the appellant and learned counsel for the State. Learned counsel for the appellant has submitted that prayer for bail of the appellant was earlier rejected by this Court vide order dated 27.10.2009. He has further contended that as the appellant is in custody from 29.07.2009, thus, he has completed half of the sentence awarded to him. Learned counsel for the State has opposed but he has not disputed the period of custody of the appellant. Considering the fact that the appellant has already served half of the sentence awarded to him, during the pendency of the appeal, the appellant, above named, is directed to be released on bail, on furnishing bail b...
Tanweer Akhtar ? Tanweer Khan Vs. State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Feb-05-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A. B.A. No. 967 of 2012 Tanweer Akhtar @ Tanweer Khan .... Petitioner Vs. The State of Jharkhand ..... .... Opposite party CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRASHANT KUMAR For the Petitioner : Mr. Nilesh Kumar For the State : Mr. G.S. Prasad, APP 16/05.02.2013: Anticipatory bail application filed by petitioner Tanweer Akhtar @ Tanweer Khan in connection with Giridih ( T) P.S. Case No. 45 of 2011 ( G.R. Case No. 413 of 2011) pending in the court of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Giridih is moved by Sri Nilesh Kumar and opposed by Sri G.S. Prasad, learned Additional P.P. It is submitted that one of the petitioner, namely, Rakesh Kumar Gupta has been granted bail by a Bench of this Court, thus the petitioner may also be enlarged on anticipatory bail. On the other hand, learned Additional P.P. submits that the case of petitioner is similar to co-accused Balram Jaiswal @ Balram Bhagat and co accused Bikram Bhagat @ Vikram Bhagat whose anticipatory bail ...
Jainandan Yadav Alias Jaynandan Yadav Vs. the State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Feb-05-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A. B.A. No. 348 of 2013 Jainandan Yadav @ Jaynandan Yadav .... Petitioner Vs. The State of Jharkhand ..... .... Opposite party CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRASHANT KUMAR For the Petitioner : Mr. M.B. Lal For the State : Mr. S.S. Choudhary , APP 2/05.02.2013: Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this anticipatory bail application. Permission accorded. Accordingly, this anticipatory bail application is dismissed as withdrawn. ( Prashant Kumar,J.) Sharda/-...
- ‹ Prev
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- 12
- 14
- 15
- 16
- Next ›
- Last »