Nirmal Kumar Vs. the State of Jharkhand

Nirmal Kumar vs The State of Jharkhand

Type Court Judgment Court Jharkhand Decided Feb 05, 2013

~2 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/971569

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/971569
Court: Jharkhand High Court
Decided On: Feb 05, 2013
Subject: Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue: Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Nirmal Kumar

Respondent

The State of Jharkhand

Excerpt

in the high court of jharkhand at ranchi b.a. no. 502 of 2013 nirmal kumar ..... petitioner versus the state of jharkhand . opposite party coram: honble mr. justice h. c. mishra for the petitioner :mr. ranjeet kumar singh for the state :a. p.p. ----- 03/05.02.2013 heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned a.p.p. for the prosecution. petitioner has been made accused for the offence under sections 467, 468, 471, 420, 406, 409, 120(b) of the indian penal code, in connection with gumla p.s. case no. 337 of 2011, corresponding to g.r. no. 1110 of 2011. though the petitioner has been made accused in this case, but it appears that with the same allegation another f.i.r. was earlier lodged against the petitioner which is basia p. s. case no. 51 of 2008. learned counsel for the petitioner has pointed out that in the said case the petitioner has already been granted anticipatory bail and, accordingly, has prayed for bail. the order granting anticipatory bail of the petitioner has been brought on record as annexure 7. in the facts and circumstances of the case, i am inclined to release the petitioner on bail. accordingly, the petitioner nirmal kumar is directed to be released on bail, on furnishing bail bond of rs.10,000/- (rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of learned chief judicial magistrate, gumla, in connection with gumla p.s. case no. 337 of 2011, corresponding to g.r. no. 1110 of 2011. (h. c. mishra, j) umesh/-

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 502 of 2013 Nirmal Kumar ..... Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand . Opposite Party CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE H. C. MISHRA For the Petitioner :Mr. Ranjeet Kumar Singh For the State :A. P.P. ----- 03/05.02.2013 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the Prosecution. Petitioner has been made accused for the offence under Sections 467, 468, 471, 420, 406, 409, 120(B) of the Indian Penal Code, in connection with Gumla P.S. Case No. 337 of 2011, corresponding to G.R. No. 1110 of 2011. Though the petitioner has been made accused in this case, but it appears that with the same allegation another F.I.R. was earlier lodged against the petitioner which is Basia P. S. Case No. 51 of 2008. Learned counsel for the petitioner has pointed out that in the said case the petitioner has already been granted anticipatory bail and, accordingly, has prayed for bail. The order granting anticipatory bail of the petitioner has been brought on record as Annexure 7. In the facts and circumstances of the case, I am inclined to release the petitioner on bail. Accordingly, the petitioner Nirmal Kumar is directed to be released on bail, on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Gumla, in connection with Gumla P.S. Case No. 337 of 2011, corresponding to G.R. No. 1110 of 2011. (H. C. Mishra, J) Umesh/-

Same Court & Year Jharkhand · 2013 Same Parties Nirmal Kumar vs The State of Jharkhand Same Subject Education