Jharkhand Court January 2013 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
M/S.Singhbhum Technocast Pvt.L Vs. Jharkhand State Electricity Bo
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jan-10-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W. P. (C) No. 1684 of 2007 M/s. Singhbhum Technocast Pvt. Ltd. . ..Petitioner -Versus- Jharkhand State Electricity Board & others..Respondents. --- CORAM : HONBLE MR. JUSTICE APARESH KUMAR SINGH --- For the Petitioner : Mr. K. K. Singh, Adv. For the Respondents-Board : Mr. Rajesh Shankar, Adv. -- 06/10.1.2013 ThecounteraffidavitfiledbytheRespondentsBoard,does notanswerthespecificavermentsmadebythepetitionerthathewas forcedtodepositRs.64Lakhsaselectricityduesandfine,although therewasnoF.I.R.registeredundertheElectricityAct,2003norwas anyinspectionreportinrespectofthedetectionoftheftofelectricity onthepartofthepetitioner.Itdoesnotalsoappearfromperusalof thecounteraffidavitthatanybillswereraisedondetectionofeither unauthorized use of electricity or theft of electricity for the said amountafterwhichthepetitionerwasaskedtodeposittheamount inquestion.Thisaffidavititselfhasbeenfiledafterfiveyearsofthe filingofthewritpetitionandthematerhasbeenadjournedo...
Madhu Singh Vs. Bidesh Singh
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jan-10-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Election Petition No. 3 of 2010 Madhu Singh .. Petitioner Versus Bidesh Singh .. Respondent ----- CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE NARENDRA NATH TIWARI ----- For the Petitioner - Mr. A.K.Lall For the Respondent - Mr. V.P.Singh, Sr. Adv. ----- 28/10.1.2013 I. A. No. 131/2013 In this application, information has been given regarding the death of the sole petitioner. It has been stated that the sole petitioner died on 6.12.2012. After the death of the sole petitioner, this election petition stands abated under the provision of Section 112 of the Representation of the People Act, 1951. Learned counsel for the respondent has not controverted the said statements. The intimation regarding the death of the sole petitioner is noted. The legal consequence would follow. This application stands disposed of. (NARENDRA NATH TIWARI, J) Election Petition No. 3 of 2010 In view of the intimation given in I. A. No. 131/2013 about the death of the sole petitioner, this el...
Parmanand Dutta and ors Vs. Steel Authority of India Ltd.
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jan-10-2013
IN THE HIGH Court OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(S). No. 3561 of 2003 Permanand Dutta & others Petitioners Versus Steel Authority of India Limited & Ors. Respondents ---------- CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE APARESH KUMAR SINGH For the Petitioner : Mr. Sumeet Kr. Gadodia For the Respondents : Mr.Indrajit Sinha ----------- 10/10.01.2013 After hearing the counsel for the parties, it appears that the issue raised in the present writ application is squarely covered by the judgment of Hon'ble Supreme Court in Civil Appeal No. 1774 of 2008 in the case of Steel Authority of India Limited Vrs. Daby Lal Mahto & others reported in 2008(3) J.C.R. 152 SC in which the issues involved are similar to the issues raised in the present writ petition and that have been answered against the petitioner. In that view of the matter, no relief can be granted to the petitioners who have claimed appointment for displaced persons in Class-IV post pursuant to the policy decision of the respondent dated 21.6.1963. Accordi...
Dr.Nawal Kishore Nath Sahdeo Vs. State of Jharkhand and ors
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jan-10-2013
In the High Court of Jharkhand at Ranchi Cont.Case (C ) No.858 of 2011 Dr.Nawal Kishore Nath Shahdeo...................Petitioner VERSUS State of Jharkhand and others.........Opposite Parties CORAM: HONBLE MR.JUSTICE R.R.PRASAD For the Petitioner : Mr. A.K.Das For the State :J.C to Sr.S.C.I For the University :Mr.Amit Kumar Sinha 6/ 10.1.13. Mr. Amit Kumar Sinha, learned counsel appearing for the University submits that a sum of Rs.2,50,000/- was supposed tobe released by the Director, Higher Education, Human Resources Development Department but the University was asked by the Department to make payment from the internal source of the University so that later on that amount be reimbursed to the University and accordingly, a cheque of Rs.2,50,000/- is being handed over to the counsel appearing for the petitioner towards compliance of the order passed by this Court. Since payment has been made by the internal source of the University, the said amount be reimbursed to the University as ea...
Meena Devi Vs. State of Jharkhand and ors
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jan-10-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(C) No. 1457 of 2011 Meena Devi ..... Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand & Others . Respondents CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE P. P. BHATT For the Petitioner :Mr.Subodh Kr. Jha, Pranav Kr.Jha,Advocates For the Respondents : S.C. (Mines) ----- 07/10.01.2013 The petitioner by way of present writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India , has prayed for issuance of writ/order for quashing and setting aside final order dated 11.07.2010 passed by the Deputy Commissioner, Hazaribagh in Record Case No.15 of 2010-11, rejecting the claim of the petitioner as raiyat of Khata No.63, Plot No.01 measuring an area 24 decimal, Mauza-Demo Tand, Thana No.245 within the district of Hazaribagh. It is further prayed that necessary direction may be issued upon the respondent to pay proper and adequate compensation for the part of claim, which is required for the purpose of widening of N.H.33. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well...
Shakntala MahatawaIn and anr. Vs. State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jan-10-2013
1 CRIMINALAPPEAL(DB)No.566of2002 (Againstthejudgmentofconvictionandorderofsentencedated17th August, 2002and19thAugust,2002respectivelypassedbylearnedAdditionalSessions Judge,JamtarainSessionsCaseNo.41of1991/76of2001) 1.ShakuntalaMahatawain 2.BhutoMahato Appellants Versus TheStateofJharkhand Respondent FortheAppellants :Mr.NileshKumar,Advocate FortheState :Mr.VibhutiShankarSahay,A.P .P. PRESENT HONBLEMR.JUSTICED.N.PATEL HON'BLEMR.JUSTICED.N.UPADHYAY PerD.N.Patel,J.:1. Thepresentappealhasbeenpreferredagainstthejudgmentofconviction and order of sentence dated 17th August, 2002 and 19th August, 2002 respectively,passedbylearnedAdditionalSessionsJudge,JamtarainSessions CaseNo.41of1991/76of2001,whereby,thepresentappellantshavebeen punishedforlifeimprisonmentfortheoffencepunishableunderSection302to bereadwithSection34oftheIndianPenalCodeandforthreeyearsrigorous imprisonmentfortheoffencepunishableunderSection498Atobereadwith Section34oftheIndianPenalCodeandboththesentenceshavebeenordered torun...
Janeshwar Dubey and ors Vs. State of Jharkhand and ors
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jan-10-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cont. Case (Civil) No.514 of 2011 Janeshwar Dubey & Others Petitioners -Versus- The State of Jharkhand & Others. .... Opposite Parties. ------ CORAM : HONBLE MR. JUSTICE NARENDRA NATH TIWARI ------ For the Petitioners : Mr. Nilesh Kumar For the Opp. Parties : Sr.S.C.I ------ 7/10.01.2013: When this case is taken up, learned Senior Standing Counsel not I assured that the order of this Court shall be fully complied with by 28th February, 2013 and an affidavit to that regard shall be filed in this Court. In view of the said assurance, time till 28th February, 2013, as prayed for, is allowed. It is made clear that if the order of this Court is not complied with, as assured, the Deputy Commissioner, Latehar shall appear in person on the next date fixed, so that appropriate order be passed in his presence for non-compliance of the order of this Court. Put up this case on 06th March, 2013. (Narendra Nath Tiwari, J.) Shamim/Saket...
Shishir Tirkey Vs. the State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jan-10-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A. B.A. No. 3442 o1. Shishir Tirkey 2. Anmol Baxla .........Petitioners Vs. The State of Jharkhand ........Opposite party CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRASHANT KUMAR For the Petitioner: Mr. A.K. Chaturvedi For the State: Mrs. Niki Sinha ,APP 7/10.01.2013: Anticipatory bail application filed by petitioners Shishir Tirkey and Anmol Baxla in connection with Complaint Case No. 49 of 2011 pending in the court of learned District and Additional Sessions Judge-1, Gumla is moved by Sri A.K. Chaturvedi and opposed by Mrs. Niki Sinha, learned Additional P.P. It is submitted by Sri A.K. Chaturvedi, learned counsel for the petitioner that petitioner has filed a criminal miscellaneous petition bearing Cr.M.P. No. 1742 of 2012 for quashing of entire criminal proceeding. In the said Cr.M.P., a Bench of this Court had directed that no coercive step be taken against the petitioner in connection with Complaint Case No. 49 of 2011. In view of the aforesaid order, I ...
Akhil Bhartiya Adivashi Vikash Vs. Union of India and ors
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jan-10-2013
In the High Court of Jharkhand at Ranchi Civil Review No.93 of 2009 Akhil Bhartiya Adivashi Vikash Parishad, through the Secretary, Dr. Laxman Oraon .Petitioner VERSUS Union of India through the Secretary, Ministry of Tribal Affairs and othersRespondents CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE R.R.PRASAD For the Petitioner : Mr.Rajiv Kumar For the Respondents: Mr.Prabhash Kumar 6/ 10.1.13. This review application has been filed for review of the order dated 8.3.2002 passed in C.W.J.C.No.3618 of 2000 for expunction of remarks made therein that the petitioner had filed second writ application concealing the fact that he had moved an application earlier. It appears that the petitioner, a Registered Society under the Societies Registration Act, 1860, had been given grant in aid for the period 1997-98 in the year 2000 by the Ministry of Tribal Affairs. For the subsequent year, when grant in aid was not given for the reason that some dispute had been raised by one Dr.Durga Bhagat, the petitioner filed a w...
Tileshwar Sahu Vs. the State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jan-10-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND RANCHI A. B. A. No. 3082 of 2012 With A. B. A. No. 3266 o1. Tileshwar Sahu ... Petitioner (In A.B.A. No. 3082/2012) 2. Arun Sahu 3. Yugal Kishore Sahu 4. Deepak Ohdar @ Deepak Kr. Nag 5. Sulendra Sahu Petitioners (In A.B.A. No. 3266/2012) Versus The State of Jharkhand ... ... Opp. Party (In both cases) CORAM: THE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE PRASHANT KUMAR ............ For the Petitioners : M/s Anil Kumar, Shashi Kumar (In both cases) For the Opp. Party : Mr. Abhishek Kumar, A.P.P. (In A.B.A. No. 3082/2012) Mr. V.K. Tiwary, A.P.P.(In A.B.A. No. 3266/2012) ........ 4/10.01.2013 Both the applications arose from the same F.I.R., thus, are heard together and disposed of by this order. Anticipatory bail applications filed by Tileshwar Sahu, Arun Sahu, Yugal Kishore Sahu, Deepak Ohdar @ Deepak Kr. Nag and Sulendra Sahu, in connection with Kamdara P.S. Case No. 53 of 2008 corresponding to G.R. No. 1035 of 2008 pending in the court of S.D.J.M. Gumla, is moved by Sri Anil K...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 6
- 7
- 8
- Next ›
- Last »