Jharkhand Court January 2013 Judgments
Anindya Biswas Vs. State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jan-10-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A. B.A. No. 3392 of 2012 Anindya Biswas .........Petitioner Vs. The State of Jharkhand & Anr ........Opposite parties CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRASHANT KUMAR For the Petitioner: Mr. P.C. Tripathy For the State: Mr. Pawan Kumar Choudhary ,APP For the O.P. No. 2: Mr. M.A. Khan 4/10.01.2013: Put up this case on 15.01.2013 awaiting the report of Mediation Centre, Jamshedpur. In the meantime, the interim order dated 01.10.2012 shall continue. ( Prashant Kumar,J.) Sharda/-...
Tag this Judgment!Syed Mashodul Haque Vs. the State of Jharkhand and anr
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jan-10-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(C) No. 7047 of 2012 Syed Mashodul Haque ..... Petitioner Versus State of Jharkhand and anr. . Respondents CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK SINGH For the Petitioner : Mr. S.N. Ahmed, Advocate For the Respondents : Mr. V.K. Prasad, S.C. (L & C) ----- 2 /10.01.2013 Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the Secretary of State Consumer Dispute Redressal Commission is not taking any decision on the application moved by the petitioner for the refund of the money. He submits that an appropriate representation shall be moved before the Chairman of the State Consumer Dispute Redressal Commission for the redressal of the grievances of the petitioner. Therefore, he may be permitted to withdraw this petition with the aforesaid liberty. Permitted to be withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty. (Alok Singh, J.) R.K....
Tag this Judgment!Swapan Kumar Mahato Vs. the State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jan-10-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A. B.A. No. 3425 of 2012 Swapan Kumar Mahato @ Swapan Mahato.........Petitioner Vs. The State of Jharkhand ........Opposite party CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRASHANT KUMAR For the Petitioner: Mr. Ashutosh Mishra For the State: Mr. Tapas Roy ,APP 3/10.01.2013: After some argument, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this anticipatory bail application. Permission accorded. Accordingly, this anticipatory bail application is dismissed as withdrawn. ( Prashant Kumar,J.) Sharda/-...
Tag this Judgment!Dhania OraIn Vs. Revenue Department
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jan-10-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W. P. (C) No. 5145 of 2012 --- 1.Dhania Orain 2.Uri Orain Petitioners Versus 1.The State of Jharkhand 2.The Secretary, Land Reforms & Revenue Department, Govt. of Jharkhand, Ranchi 3.The Deputy Commissioner, Ranchi 4.The District Land Acquisition Officer, Ranchi 5.Madi Uraon 6.Gangia Orain Respondents --- CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK SINGH --- For the Petitioner : Mr. Sujit Narayan Prasad, Advocate For the Respondents : Mr. Amit Kumar Verma, J.C. to S.C. (L & C) --- 2/10.01.2013 Mr. Sujit Narayan Prasad, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that if question arises as to whether compensation of the acquired land as per the award is payable to the applicant, the Collector should refer such dispute to the decision of the competent Court. However, such question cannot be decided by the Collector himself. He further submits that in the present case, Deputy Collector has passed impugned order dated 11.07.2012, annexure no. 7 to the effect th...
Tag this Judgment!Vidiya Das Vs. State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jan-10-2013
INTHEHIGHCOURTOFJHARKHANDATRANCHI Cr.Appeal(DB)No.311of2006 VidyaDas Appellant Versus StateofJharkhand ... ... ... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLEMR.JUSTICED.N.PATEL HON'BLEMR.JUSTICED.N.UPADHYAY FortheAppellant: Mr.K.P.Deo FortheRespondent: Mr.A.K.Jha,A.P.P. 05/Dated:January,10,2013 PerD.N.Patel,J I.A.No.35of20121) The presentapplicationhasbeenpreferredby the sole appellant, who is original accused No.2, under Sections 389(1) of the Code of CriminalProcedureforsuspensionofsentenceawardedbythe7 th Addl. SessionsJudge,FastTrackCourtNo.4,Goddavideorderdated26 thMach, 2004, during pendency of this criminal appeal, whereby the present applicant is mainly punished for the offence under Section 302 of the IndianPenalCodeinSessionsCaseNo.225of20032) Counselfortheappellantsubmittedthattheappellantisincustody sinceApril,2001.Previouslytwicetheprayerforsuspensionofsentence hasbeenrejectedbythisCourtandhence,letthedateforfinalhearingof theappealmaybefixedasperperiodofcustodyofthepetitioner.3) Counselfo...
Tag this Judgment!Baidyanath Prasad Vs. Information Commission
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jan-10-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W. P. (C) No. 6775 of 2012 --- Baidyanath Prasad Petitioner Versus The Jharkhand State Information Commission, Ranchi & others Respondents --- CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK SINGH --- For the Petitioner : Mr. Sujit Narayan Prasad, Advocate For the Respondents : Mr. Amrendra Pradhan, J.C. to G.P. VI --- 3/10.01.2013 Let notices be issued to respondent no. 3 returnable within four weeks by registered post with A/D in addition to normal mode of service on steps being taken by the petitioner within a week. Meanwhile, operation and effect of impugned order dated 6.9.2012 vide Memo No. 7865 shall remain stayed. (Alok Singh, J.) R.ShekharCp2...
Tag this Judgment!Nawal Kishore Sharma Vs. State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jan-10-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND RANCHI A. B. A. No. 3227 of 2012 Nawal Kishore Sharma ... ... ... Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand ... ... Opp. Party CORAM: THE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE PRASHANT KUMAR ............ For the Petitioner : Mr. Prakash Chandra Roy For the Opp. Party : Mr. S.K. Srivastava, A.P.P. ........ 4/10.01.2013 Anticipatory bail application filed by petitioner Nawal Kishore Sharma in connection with Patratu P.S. Case No. 80 of 2012 corresponding to G.R. No. 1201 of 2012 pending in the court of learned S.D.J.M. Hazaribag is moved by Sri Prakash Chandra Roy, learned counsel for the petitioner and opposed by Sri S.K. Srivastava, learned Additional PP. for the State. It is alleged that petitioner used to ply Bolero Vehicle by putting the number plate of JH-01 Y 5920.which is the Registration No. of informant's Bolero Vehicle. Petitioner's vehicle seized by the police. It is submitted that seized Bolero vehicle belongs to Rajesh Ghasi and same was released in his favour. I...
Tag this Judgment!Ms Vindhya Construction Vs. Road Construction
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jan-10-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(C) No. 3833 of 2012. --- M/S Vindhya Construction through its Partner Dinesh Kumar Dubey ... ... ... ... Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand and others ... ... ... ... Respondents --- CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK SINGH --- For the Petitioner : Mrs. Ritu Kumar, Advocate. For the Respondents : J.C. to Advocate General. --- 03. 10.01.2013. I.A. No. 2456 of 2012: This is an application seeking amendment in the writ petition. For the reasons stated in the application, amendment sought seems to be just and proper for the fair adjudication of the case. Consequently, I.A. No. 2456 of 2012 is allowed. W.P. (C) No. 3833 of 2012: Let amended writ petition be placed on record with advance copy to the learned counsel for the respondents within ten days. Let counter affidavit be filed to the amended writ petition within next three weeks. Rejoinder, if any, may be filed within three weeks thereafter. (Alok Singh, J.) AKS....
Tag this Judgment!B.S.K. College Maithan Vs. State of Jharkhand and ors
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jan-10-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI WP(C) No.1524 of 2008 ---- B.S.K. College Maithen ... Petitioner -Versus- The State of Jharkhand & others ... Respondents ---- CORAM : HONBLE MR. JUSTICE APARESH KUMAR SINGH ---- For the Petitioner :Mr. Sanjay Prasad For the Respondents :Mr. Manjul Prasad (S.C.L&C) ---- 06. 10.1.2013 I.A. No. 1309 of 2008 By way of this Interlocutory Application the petitioner has sought quashing of the order dated 3rd November, 2007, whereby it has been communicated that two acres of land situated in Plot No. 73, Khata No. 133, Thana No. 251 of Mauja Merha, under Nirsa Circle of Dhanbad district was going to be transferred to Kasturba Gandhi Balika Chhatrawas by the Human Resource Development Department. The petitioner has originally come before this Court for restraining the respondents from dispossessing the petitioner from the land said to be belonging to the petitioner under said Plot No. 73, Khata No. 133, Thana No. 251 of Mauja Merha. For the reasons stat...
Tag this Judgment!Sukra Gosai Vs. State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jan-10-2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND RANCHI A. B. A. No. 3225 of 2012 Sukra Gosai ... ... ... Petitioner Versus 1.The State of Jharkhand 2. Meera Devi ... ... Opp. Parties CORAM: THE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE PRASHANT KUMAR ............ For the Petitioner : Mr. R.C. Khatri For the State : Mr. Ravi Prakash, A.P.P. For the O.P. No.-2 Mr. Mahavir Pd. Sinha ........ 4/10.01.2013 Anticipatory bail application filed by petitioner Sukra Gosai is moved by Sri R.C. Khatri, learned counsel for the petitioner and opposed by Sri Ravi Prakash, learned Additional PP. for the State. and Sri Mahavir Pd. Sinha, learned counsel for the opposite party No.2. At the outset, Sri R.C. Khatri, submits that petitioner is ready to keep opposite party No. 2 with all love and dignity and he is also ready to give written undertaking that he will not torture her in future. Sri Mahavir Pd. Sinha, submits that his client is also ready to reside with petitioner provided that he will give an undertaking that he will not torture her...
Tag this Judgment!- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- Next ›
- Last »