Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Ms Vindhya Construction Vs. Road Construction

Ms Vindhya Construction vs Road Construction

Type Court Judgment Court Jharkhand Decided Jan 10, 2013
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/971899

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Jharkhand High Court
Decided On
Subject
Land Acquisition

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Land Acquisition

Key legal issue
Land Acquisition

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Ms Vindhya Construction

Respondent

Road Construction

Excerpt

in the high court of jharkhand at ranchi w.p.(c) no. 3833 of 2012. --- m/s vindhya construction through its partner dinesh kumar dubey ... ... ... ... petitioner versus the state of jharkhand and others ... ... ... ... respondents --- coram: honble mr. justice alok singh --- for the petitioner : mrs. ritu kumar, advocate. for the respondents : j.c. to advocate general. --- 03. 10.01.2013. i.a. no. 2456 of 2012: this is an application seeking amendment in the writ petition. for the reasons stated in the application, amendment sought seems to be just and proper for the fair adjudication of the case. consequently, i.a. no. 2456 of 2012 is allowed. w.p. (c) no. 3833 of 2012: let amended writ petition be placed on record with advance copy to the learned counsel for the respondents within ten days. let counter affidavit be filed to the amended writ petition within next three weeks. rejoinder, if any, may be filed within three weeks thereafter. (alok singh, j.) aks.

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(C) No. 3833 of 2012. --- M/S Vindhya Construction through its Partner Dinesh Kumar Dubey ... ... ... ... Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand and others ... ... ... ... Respondents --- CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK SINGH --- For the Petitioner : Mrs. Ritu Kumar, Advocate. For the Respondents : J.C. to Advocate General. --- 03. 10.01.2013. I.A. No. 2456 of 2012: This is an application seeking amendment in the writ petition. For the reasons stated in the application, amendment sought seems to be just and proper for the fair adjudication of the case. Consequently, I.A. No. 2456 of 2012 is allowed. W.P. (C) No. 3833 of 2012: Let amended writ petition be placed on record with advance copy to the learned counsel for the respondents within ten days. Let counter affidavit be filed to the amended writ petition within next three weeks. Rejoinder, if any, may be filed within three weeks thereafter. (Alok Singh, J.) AKS.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial