Jharkhand Court September 2012 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Baby Kumari Alias Baby Devi Vs. the State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Sep-17-2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No. 2123 of 2012 Baby Kumari @ Baby Devi .... Petitioner Versus State of Jharkhand ... Opposite Party Coram : HONBLE MR. JUSTICE D.N.UPADHYAY For the petitioner (s): Mr. S.P.Sinha 2. For the opposite party : Addl.P.P. 17.09.2012 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel for the State. This is an application for grant of anticipatory bail filed by the petitioner in connection with complaint case no. 1253 of 2009 for the offence registered under sections 498A/323/379 of the Indian Penal Code. There is allegation in the complaint that Ahilya Devi was subjected to torture and treated with cruelty for want of more dowry by her husband and in laws. It is submitted that the husband Kasinath Modi has been granted bail vide ABA No. 1759 of 2011. The petitioner happens to be the second wife of the said Kasinath Modi. Learned counsel for the State has opposed the prayer. Since the husband has been granted anticipatory bail...
Kishlay Pratap Singh Vs. State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Sep-17-2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B. A. No. 4977 of 2012 Kishlay Pratap Singh ..... Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand .. Opposite Party -------- CORAM : HONBLE MR. JUSTICE H. C. MISHRA ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Sumeet Gadodia, Advocate For the State : Mr. Awanikant Prasad, A.P.P. ------ 4/ 17.09.2012 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the Prosecution. The petitioner has been made accused for the offences under Sections 366, 376/34 of the Indian Penal Code, in connection with Dhurwa P.S. Case No. 97 of 2012 corresponding to G.R. No. 2594 of 2012. The case relates to gang rape, but from the F.I.R., it appears that the petitioner is not named nor he was apprehended at the spot. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case only on the basis of confessional statement and he was not put to test identification parade. Learned counsel for the petitioner has accordingly prayed for b...
Bishun Bhuiyan Vs. State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Sep-17-2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B. A. No. 3347 of 2012 Bishun Bhuiyan ..... Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand .. Opposite Party -------- CORAM : HONBLE MR. JUSTICE H. C. MISHRA ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Munna Lal Yadav, Advocate For the State : Mr. Prem Prakash, A.P.P. ------ 6/ 17.09.2012 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the Prosecution. The petitioner has been made accused for the offence under Sections 379, 411, 413, 414 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 33 and 42 of the Indian Forest Act, in connection with Itkhori P.S. Case No. 10 of 1999 corresponding to G.R. No. 64 of 1999 (S.T. No. 65 of 2012). The case relates to recovery of 5 quantiles of Khair wood from the house of the petitioner. In the facts of the case, I am inclined to enlarge the petitioner, Bishun Bhuiyan, on bail. Accordingly, the petitioner, named above, is directed to be released on bail, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand), with two sureti...
Ramakant Tiwary Vs. State of Jharkhand and ors
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Sep-17-2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W. P. (C) No. 3177 of 2012 Ramakant Tiwary .. Petitioner Versus State of Jharkhand & Others .. Respondents ----- CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE NARENDRA NATH TIWARI ----- For the Petitioner - Mr. D.K.Jaiswal For the Respondents - Mr. J.C to S.C-II ----- 9/17.9.2012 Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this writ petition in order to approach the State Government praying for relaxation of age, as has been given to the candidates appearing in the examinations conducted by the Jharkhand Public Service Commission, Ranchi, as per the State Government resolution dated 21.1.2003. Permission, as sought for, is granted. This writ petition is, accordingly, disposed of as withdrawn. S.K (NARENDRA NATH TIWARI, J)...
Deepak Bansal and ors Vs. State of Jharkhand and anr
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Sep-17-2012
In the High Court of Jharkhand at Ranchi Cr.M.P.No.706 of 2011 Deepak Bansal and others..Petitioners VERSUS State of Jharkhand and another.Opposite Parties CORAM: HONBLE MR.JUSTICE R.R.PRASAD For the Petitioners :Mr.K.P.Deo For the State :A.P.P For the O.P.No.2 : Mr.P.A.S.Pati 6/ 17.9.12. Pursuant to the order dated 5.9.2012, opposite party no.2 is present in the Court but the petitioner is absent. However, it was stated by Mr.Sanjay Bansal, elder brother of the petitioner that since the petitioner was not well, he could not come to the Court today. However, he prays that the matter be posted after one month so that in the meantime, petitioner may make up his mind for getting the case compromised. Upon which, it was stated by the opposite party no.2 that if the date is fixed after one month then other side must make it point that on the next date the petitioner remain present so that dispute be resolved on that date. In view of the facts and circumstances stated above, let this matter ...
Sanoj Kumar Paswan Alias Sanoj Kumar Vs. State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Sep-17-2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A No.5353 of 2012 ------ Sanoj Kumar Paswan @ Sanoj Kumar . Petitioner -Versus- The State of Jharkhand ..... Opposite Party ------ CORAM : THE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE H.C.MISHRA ------ For the Petitioner : Mr.Anil Kumar, Advocate. For the State : A.P.P. ------ 4/ 17.09.2012 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as also learned counsel for the State. The petitioner has been made accused in Bishrampur P.S. Case No. 110 of 2011 corresponding to G.R No. 2015 of 2011, S.T No.169 of 2012 for the offence under Sections 395, 397 of the Indian Penal Code. From the F.I.R, it appears that the case relates to bank dacoity and it appears that miscreants had come on motorcycles to commit dacoity. The registration numbers of the motorcycles have been mentioned in the F.I.R. The impugned order shows that the petitioner was apprehended in this case on the basis of confessional statement of the petitioner and the motorcycle used in the crime has been recovered. I...
M/S Metalite India Ltd. Vs. Union of India and ors
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Sep-17-2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(C) No.3869 of 2010 M/s Metalite India Ltd. petitioner -Versus- Union of India & Ors. ...Respondents. ------ CORAM : HONBLE MR. JUSTICE NARENDRA NATH TIWARI ------ For the petitioner : Mr. A.K. Rashidi, Advocate For the Respondents : Mr. CGC. ------ I.A. No.2771 o3. 17.09.2012: In this I.A. the petitioner has prayed for permission to withdraw W.P.(C) No.3869/2010. It has been submitted that the parties have settled the dispute outside the Court and, as such, they do not want to pursue this writ petition and seeks permission to withdraw the same. The respondents have no objection. Considering the above, this I.A. is allowed. The petitioner is permitted to withdraw W.P.(C) No.3869 of 2010. I.A. No.2771 of 2012 stands disposed of. (Narendra Nath Tiwari, J.) W.P.(C) No.3869 of 2010 In view of the order dated 17.9.2012 passed in I.A. No.2771 of 2012, this writ petition is dismissed, as withdrawn. (Narendra Nath Tiwari, J.) Shamim/...
Dilip Kumar Verma Vs. State of Jharkhand and Others
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Sep-17-2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(C) No. 1920 of 2007 Dilip Kumar Verma . Petitioner -V e r s u s- The State of Jharkhand & Ors. . Respondents. CORAM: - HONBLE MR. JUSTICE APARESH KUMAR SINGH. For the Petitioner: - M/s Saurav Arun & Deepak Kr. Dubey For the Respondents: - M/s Shankar Lal Agrawal. 09/17.09.2012 Heard learned counsel for the parties. The petitioner is aggrieved by the order dated 28.02.2007(Annexure-8) passed by the Permanent Lok Adalat, Jamshedpur, Singhbhum East in PLA Case No. 35 of 2006, which was preferred by the respondent no. 5, directing him to pay the amount of award of Rs. 2,25,000/- within two months failing which the same shall be realised alongwith interest @ 14 % per annum in accordance with law. The order impugned is challenged on behalf of the petitioner on the following ground:- (i) that the petitioner does work under the subcontract executed by the J.S.E.B. or J.U.S.C.O with the Respondent No. 3 and thus, petitioner does not fall under the P...
Om Prakash Bharti and ors Vs. the State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Sep-17-2012
INTHEHIGHCOURTOFJHARKHANDATRANCHI Cr.Appeal(DB)No.801of2012 OmPrakashBharti&ors. Appellants Versus TheStateofJharkhand Respondent CORAM: HONBLEMR.JUSTICED.N.PATEL HON'BLEMR.JUSTICEPRASHANTKUMAR FortheAppellants :Mr.B.M.Tripathi,Sr.Advocate FortheState :Mr.S.S.Prasad,A.P.P. 06/Dated:17 th September,2012 OralOrder PerD.N.Patel,J.:1. Thepresentappealhasalreadybeenadmittedvideorderdated6thAugust, 2012.2. Learnedcounselappearingonbehalfoftheappellantssubmittedthatthe appellantsarenotpressingtheprayerforsuspensionofsentence.3. Registryisdirectedtogetthepaperbookswithneatlytypedcopies of the depositions of the prosecution witnesses and other documents prepared, asrequiredunderRules190 and 191 of the Jharkhand High CourtRules,2001. (D.N.Patel,J.) (PrashantKumar,J.) Ajay/...
Sriman Marandi Vs. State of Jharkhand and ors
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Sep-17-2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W. P. (C) No. 2653 of 2012 Sriman Marandi .. Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand, through the Principal Secretary / Secretary, Personnel Administrative Reforms and Rajbhasha Department, Government of Jharkhand, Ranchi & Others .. Respondents ----- CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE NARENDRA NATH TIWARI ----- For the Petitioner - Mr. Manoj Tandon For the Respondents - M/s A. K. Sinha (A.G), S. Piprawall ----- 2/17.9.2012 In this writ petition, the petitioner has prayed for quashing the result of the 4th Civil Services Preliminary Examination, 2011 published by the Jharkhand Public Service Commission, Ranchi in daily Prabhat Khabar dated 1.12.2011 on the ground of the same being contrary to Clause-6 of the advertisement. The petitioner has further prayed for quashing the revised result of the 4th Combined Civil services Preliminary Examination, 2011 published by the Jharkhand Public Service Commission in the daily Hindustan dated 4.2.2012 on the same ...
- ‹ Prev
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 10
- 11
- 12
- 13
- 14
- Next ›
- Last »