Jharkhand Court September 2012 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
State of Jharkhand and ors. Vs. Arun Sinha and ors
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Sep-17-2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI L.P.A. No. 214 of 2008 The State of Jharkhand & Ors. ...... Appellants Vs. Arun Sinha & Ors. ... Respondents ------ CORAM: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE JAYA ROY ------ Order No. 10 Dated 17th September, 2012 As prayed for, put up this case on 25th September, 2012. (Prakash Tatia, C J) (Jaya Roy , J) Alankar/-...
Mohan Sardar Vs. State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Sep-17-2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B. A. No. 3104 of 2012 Mohan Sardar ..... Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand .. Opposite Party -------- CORAM : HONBLE MR. JUSTICE H. C. MISHRA ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Nagmani Tiwari, Advocate For the State : Mr. S. Prasad, A.P.P. ------ 6/ 17.09.2012 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the Prosecution. The petitioner has been made accused for the offences under Sections 302/201/34 of the Indian Penal Code, in connection with Potka P.S. Case No. 53 of 2011 corresponding to G.R. No. 2374 of 2011. The case relates to murder of stepfather of the informant, which was instituted against unknown. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that there is no eyewitness to the occurrence and he has been falsely implicated in this case only on the basis of confessional statement and has prayed for bail. Learned A.P.P. for the State upon going through the case diary has very fairly conceded that except confess...
Ram Bilash Singh ? R.B.Singh Vs. Management of M/S Tata Iron an
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Sep-17-2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W. P (L) No. 2621 of 2012 Ram Bilash Singh @ R. B. Singh .. Petitioner Versus The Management of M/S Tata Iron and Steel Company Limited, Jamshedpur, East Singhbhum .. Respondent ----- CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE NARENDRA NATH TIWARI ----- For the Petitioner - Mr. S.K.Ughal For the Respondent - Mr. G.M.Misra ----- 4/17.9.2012 In this writ petition, the petitioner has prayed for quashing the award dated 9.11.2009 rendered by learned Labour Court, Jamshedpur in Reference Case No. 03/2002 whereby learned Labour Court has answered the reference in negative and against the concerned workman. The said award has been challenged on the ground that learned Court below has answered the reference in negative without considering the certificate of the District Education Officer and that the impugned award is vitiated on account of non- consideration of an important piece of evidence adduced by the petitioner. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the responde...
New India Assurance Company Li Vs. Smt. Chandni Mukhi and ors
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Sep-17-2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(C) No. 3628 of 2007 New India Assurance Company Ltd. . Petitioner -V e r s u s- Smt. Chandni Mukhi & Ors. . Respondents. CORAM: - HONBLE MR. JUSTICE APARESH KUMAR SINGH. For the Petitioner : - Mr. Manish Kumar For the Respondents : - None. 09/17.09.2012 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. The order and award dated 08.03.2007 and 09.03.2007 passed by the Permanent Lok Adalat, Jamshedpur in PLA Case No. 72 of 2006 is under challenge wherein it has been awarded a sum of Rs. 1,44,000/- as compensation to claimants/respondent nos. 1 to 4 and directed the petitioner to pay the same within one month failing which the same shall be realised through process of law with interest @ 14 % per annum. The claimants/respondent nos. 1 to 4 were issued and served notices earlier, but no one has entered appearance on their behalf. However, respondent no. 5, owner of the vehicle, has entered appearance through his counsel, but no one appeared on his beha...
Life Insurance Corp. of India Vs. Dharmendra Prasad Sah
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Sep-17-2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI L.P.A. No. 440 of 2011 Life Insurance Corporation of India & Others... Appellants Versus Dharmendra Prasad Sah ... Respondent ------- CORAM: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE JAYA ROY ------ For the Appellants : Mr. Sachin Kumar, Advocate For the Respondent : M/s. Tapas Kabiraj & Prabhash Kumar ------ Order No. 07 Dated 17th September, 2012 Admit. No need to issue notice to the respondent as the respondent has already put in appearance. Meanwhile, operation of the impugned judgement dated 22.07.2011 shall remain stayed. (Prakash Tatia, C.J.) (Jaya Roy, J) Birendra/...
Shambhu Sah Vs. the State of Jharkhand and anr
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Sep-17-2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr.Revision No.484 of 2012 ------ Shambhu Sah . Petitioner -Versus- The State of Jharkhand & Anr. ..... Opposite Parties ------ CORAM : THE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE H.C.MISHRA ------ For the Petitioner : Mr.Sarfaraz Akhtar, Advocate. For the State : A.P.P. ------ I.A No.1009 o6. 17.09.2012 The aforesaid interlocutory application has been filed for condonation of delay of 77 days in filing the revision application. In view of the statements made in the interlocutory application, the delay in filing the revision application is hereby, condoned. Accordingly, the aforesaid I.A stands allowed. (H.C.Mishra, J.) B.S/...
Sundar Singh Kharwar Alias Sundar Singh Vs. State of Jharkhand and ors
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Sep-17-2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A No.5835 of 2012 ------ Sundar Singh Kharwar @ Sundar Singh . Petitioner -Versus- The State of Jharkhand ..... Opposite Party ------ CORAM : THE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE H.C.MISHRA ------ For the Petitioner : Mr.Jitendra S.Singh, Advocate. For the State : A.P.P. ------ 4/ 17.09.2012 It appears that bail was granted to the petitioner by Smt. Jaya Roy, J.and the conditions imposed upon the petitioner by Her Lordship, had been violated, due to which, the bail bond of the petitioner was canceled. In that view of the matter, let this case be listed before the appropriate Bench after obtaining the approval of Hon'ble the Chief Justice. (H.C.Mishra, J.) B.S/...
Bishal Singh and Another Vs. Education
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Sep-17-2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(C) No.3620 of 2012 Bishal Singh & Anr. . Petitioners Versus State of Jharkhand & Anr. ...Respondents Coram : The Honble Mr. Justice Narendra Nath Tiwari For the Petitioners : Mr. Indrajit Sinha, Advocate For the Respondents : Mr. Anil Kumar Sinha, Advocate General ----- 5/17.09.2012 In this petition, the petitioners have prayed for quashing Clause-5(II) of the Advertisement no.01(CSSCE)2012, published in the Daily Newspaper Prabhat Khabar in its Ranchi Edition dated 4th May,2012, whereby the upper age limit has been fixed for appearing in the Jharkhand Secretariat Services Competitive Examination ,2012. It has been stated that the said examination is being held to fill up the vacant posts of Assistant, Stenographer and Lower Division Clerks in the Jharkhand Secretariat Services. The respondents are holding the examination for the first time after re-organization of the State of Jharkhand. The upper age of the said examination has been fixed...
Adivasi Unnati Samaj Vs. Union of India and ors
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Sep-17-2012
INTHEHIGHCOURTOFJHARKHANDATRANCHI W.P.(P.I.L)No.5587of2009 AdivasiUnnatiSamaj Petitioner Versus 1.UnionofIndiathroughSecretaryHomeDepartmentNewDelhi 2.TheStateofJharkhandthroughChiefSecretary 3.HomeSecretary,GovernmentofJharkhand,Ranchi 4. Principal Secretary, Revenue & Land Reforms Department, Government of JharkhandRanchi 5.PrincipalSecretary,HumanResourcesDevelopmentDepartment,Ranchi 6. Secretary, Art, Culture, Sports & Youth Affairs Department, Government of JharkhandRanchi 7.CentralBureauofInvestigation,RanchithroughitsDirector,Ranchi 8.M/sNCCUrbanInfrastructureLimited,Hyderabad 9.M/sNagarjunaConstructionCompanyLimited,throughitsManagingDirector, Ranchi 10.ExecutiveEngineer(OSD)CampRanchi... ... ... Respondents CORAM: HON'BLEMR.JUSTICED.N.PATEL HON'BLEMR.JUSTICEPRASHANTKUMAR ForthePetitioner: Mr.A.K.Sahani FortheRespondent: Mr.AnilKumarSinha,A.G. Mr.Shailesh, FortheUnionofIndia Mr.FaizurRahman 17/Dated:17 th September,2012 PerD.N.Patel,J1) Counsel appearing for the petitioner fair...
Ashok Kumar ? Mithu Bangali Vs. State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Sep-17-2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A No.5438 of 2012 ------ Krishna Singh . Petitioner -Versus- The State of Jharkhand ..... Opposite Party ------ CORAM : THE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE H.C.MISHRA ------ For the Petitioner : Mr.S.P.Sinha, Advocate. For the State : A.P.P. ------ 2/ 17.09.2012 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as also learned counsel for the State. The petitioner has been made accused in Ramgarh P.S. Case No. 15 of 2011 corresponding to G.R No. 1476 of 2011, S.T Case No.325 of 2012 for the offence under Sections 302 / 34 of the Indian Penal Code. The case relates to the murder of the father of the informant and the petitioner is named in the F.I.R. The petitioner was armed with a gun and soon upon hearing the sound of firing, the petitioner and the co-accused persons were identified in the light of torch fleeing away from the place of occurrence, in which, only the petitioner was armed with gun and it was found that the deceased had died due to gun shot injury. Th...
- ‹ Prev
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- 13
- 14
- 15
- 16
- 17
- Next ›
- Last »