Jharkhand Court December 2012 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Sandip Alias Sandip Mishra Alias Vikash Kharia Vs. the State of Jharkh ...
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Dec-19-2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 8457 of 2012 Sandip @ Sandip Mishra @ Vikash Kharia..... Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand . Opposite Party CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE H. C. MISHRA For the Petitioner :Mr. Indrajit Sinha For the State :A. P.P. ----- 05/19.12.2012 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the Prosecution. Petitioner has been made accused for the offence under Sections 387, 307, 452/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act, in connection with Gumla P.S. Case No. 196 of 2011, corresponding to G.R. No. 598 of 2011. There is direct allegation against the petitioner to have entered in the office of the informant for demand of levy and to have fired Pistol causing injury on the driver of the informant. In the facts and circumstances of the case, I am not inclined to release the petitioner Sandip @ Sandip Mishra @ Vikash Kharia on bail. Accordingly, the prayer for bail of the petitioner is rejected. (H. C. Mishra, J...
Shailesh Kumar Vs. State of Jharkhand and ors
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Dec-19-2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(S) No. 567 of 2012 Shailesh Kumar ..... Petitioner Versus State of Jharkhand and ors. . Respondents CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK SINGH For the Petitioner : Mr. S.N. Prasad, Advocate For the Respondents : Mr. Vikash Kumar, J.C. to A.A.G. ----- 3 /19.12.2012 I.A. No. 1475 of 2012 This is an application seeking stay of the operation of recovery of the excess amount from the salary of the petitioner, pursuant to the impugned order, during the pendency of this writ petition. For the reasons stated in the application, there shall be no recovery from the petitioner, during the pendency of the writ petition, pursuant to the impugned order, till further order. Accordingly, I.A. No.1475 of 2012 stands disposed of. (Alok Singh, J.) R.K....
Sapan Kumar Gurung ? Sapan Kum Vs. State of Jharkhand and ors
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Dec-19-2012
INTHEHIGHCOURTOFJHARKHANDATRANCHI W.P.(S)No.5978of2010 SapanKumarGurung@SapanKumarGuru... Petitioner Versus TheStateofJharkhand&Ors. ... ... ... Respondents CORAM: HONBLEMR.JUSTICEALOKSINGH ForthePetitioner :M/sDr.S.N.Pathak,Sr.Advocate,BindeshwariSingh FortheState :Mr.M.K.Dubey,J.C.toA.G. I.A.No.383of2011 04/19.12.2012 Learned counsel for the petitioner does not want to press this application. Accordingly,presentapplicationisdismissedasnotpressed. W.P.(S)No.5978of2010 Dr. S.N. Pathak, learned Sr. counsel for the petitioner, submits that petitioner has already been appointed, therefore, grievance of the petition stoodredressed.Consequently,hemaybepermittedtowithdrawthispetition. Accordingly,presentpetitionisdismissedaswithdrawn. (AlokSingh,J.) Manish...
Dilwar Ram Alias Dilawar Ram Vs. the State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Dec-19-2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 9649 of 2012 Dilwar Ram @ Dilawar Ram ..... Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand . Opposite Party CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE H. C. MISHRA For the Petitioner :Mr. Jasvindar Kaur For the State :A. P.P. ----- 02/19.12.2012 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the Prosecution. Petitioner has been made accused for the offence under Section 7 of the Essential Commodities Act, in connection with Basia P.S. Case No. 65 of 2012, corresponding to G.R. No. 846 of 2012. The F.I.R. shows that one truck loaded with bags of rice was seized by the Block Supply Officer, Basia, Gumla, and the petitioner has been made accused in this case being the driver of the said truck. In the facts and circumstances of the case, I am inclined to release the petitioner on bail. Accordingly, the petitioner Dilwar Ram @ Dilawar Ram is directed to be released on bail, on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sure...
Gobardhan Dhibar Vs. the State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Dec-19-2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B. A. No 8798 of 2012 --- Gobardhan Dhibar ... Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand Opposite Party --- CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK SINGH --- For the Petitioner : Mr. Chandrajit Mukherjee, Advocate For the Opposite Party : Mr. Amresh Kumar, A.P.P. --- 02 /19.12.2012 Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he may be permitted to withdraw this bail application, at this stage, with liberty to move afresh, after recording the statement of the prosecutrix in the trial. Dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty. (Alok Singh, J.) R.K./ Shanant...
Aruna Devi Vs. State of Jharkhand and ors
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Dec-19-2012
INTHEHIGHCOURTOFJHARKHANDATRANCHI W.P.(S)No.3104of2011 ArunaDevi ... Petitioner Versus TheStateofJharkhand&Ors. ... ... Respondents CORAM: HONBLEMR.JUSTICEALOKSINGH ForthePetitioner :Mr.RajeevKumar,Advocate FortheState :Mr.JayShankarTiwary,J.C.toS.C.I I.A.No.3114of2011 06/19.12.2012 Thisisanapplicationseekingimpleadmentinthewritpetition.The applicants areclaimingthemselvesassonofLateManindraMishra.Inthe present petition, mother of the applicants has sought directions for compassionate appointment to the elder son, ignoring the claims of the presentapplicants. Forthereasonsstatedintheapplication,applicantsseemtobeproper andnecessaryparty.Therefore,I.A.No.3114of2011isallowed. W.P.(S)No.3104of2011 Petitioner is directed to amend the cause title of the petition by impleadingtheapplicantsaspartyRespondentNos.6and7onorbefore10th ofJanuary,2013,failingwhich,presentpetitionshallstandrejectedwithout furtherreferencetotheBench. If amendment is carried out in the cause title, newly impleaded resp...
Umeshwar Ram and ors Vs. State of Jharkhand and ors
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Dec-19-2012
INTHEHIGHCOURTOFJHARKHANDATRANCHI W.P.(S)No.5998of2010 UmeshwarRam&Ors. ... Petitioners Versus TheStateofJharkhandthroughitsChiefSecretary, GovernmentofJharkhand,Ranchi&Ors. ... ... ... Respondents CORAM: HONBLEMR.JUSTICEALOKSINGH ForthePetitioners :Mr.KrishnaMurari,Advocate FortheState :Mr.ArbindKumar,J.C.toG.P.II I.A.No.310of2011 04/19.12.2012 Mr.KrishnaMurari,learnedcounselforthepetitioners,submitsthat sinceseparatewritpetitionispendingassailingtheorder,therefore,hedoes notwanttopressthisI.A. Accordingly,presentI.A.isdismissedasnotpressed. (AlokSingh,J.) Manish...
Sri Nath Pal Vs. State of Jharkhand and ors
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Dec-19-2012
INTHEHIGHCOURTOFJHARKHANDATRANCHI Cr.M.P.No.2668of2012 SriNathPal .... .... . Petitioner Versus TheStateofJharkhand .... .... . OppositeParty CORAM :HON'BLEMRS.JUSTICEJAYAROY ForthePetitioner :Mr.RahulKumar,Advocate FortheState :A.P.P. 02/19.12.2012 Instantapplicationhasbeenfiledformodificationofthe orderdated23rdNovember,2012passedbythisCourtinA.B.A.No. 3785of2012. Counselfortheappellanthaspointedoutthatthename ofthepetitioneris'SriNathPal'butinsteadofthatintheaforesaid orderduetotypographicalerroritismentionedas'SriNathPai'.He hasfurthersubmittedthatthepetitionerisan'ExecutiveEngineer' butitismentionedintheaforesaidorderas'JuniorEngineer'andhe hasfurtherprayedforextensionoftimeofsurrenderforafurther periodofonemonthfromthedateofthisorder. Consideringthesubmissions,thenameofthepetitioner willbereadas'SriNathPal'insteadof'SriNathPai'andfurther designationofthepetitionerwillbereadas'ExecutiveEngineer'in steadof'JuniorEngineer'. As the petitioner could not surrender within the time presc...
Musafir Yadav Vs. the State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Dec-19-2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 9768 of 2012 Musafir Yadav ..... Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand . Opposite Party CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE H. C. MISHRA For the Petitioner :Mr. Rajesh Kumar For the State :A. P.P. ----- 02/19.12.2012 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the Prosecution. Petitioner has been made accused for the offence under Sections 414 of the Indian Penal Code, in connection with Nirsa (Kalubathan) P.S. Case No. 167 of 2012, corresponding to G.R. No. 2569 of 2012. Petitioner is alleged to be involved in transaction of stolen coal. In the facts and circumstances of the case, I am inclined to release the petitioner on bail. Accordingly, the petitioner Musafir Yadav is directed to be released on bail, on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of Sri Kankan Pattadar, learned Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Dhanbad, or his successor, in connecti...
Dharmendra Prasad Singh Alias Karu Singh Vs. the State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Dec-19-2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No.3817 of 2012 ---- Dharmendra Prasad Singh @ Karu Singh....Petitioner ---Versus--- The State of Jharkhand & anr. .........Opposite Parties ---- CORAM: HON'BLE MRS.JUSTICE JAYA ROY ---- For the Petitioner : Mr. Arbind Kr. Choudhary, Advocate For the State : A.P.P. For the complainant : Mr. Nityanand Prasad Choudhary, Advocate ---- 03 / 19.12.2012 Counsel appearing for the petitioner and the counsel appearing for the complainant/informant have submitted that they are ready to compromise their matter. Accordingly, I refer this matter to the Conciliator, Deoghar, to settle their dispute. Both the parties will remain physically present before the Conciliator, Deoghar on 5th January, 2013. The conciliator, Deoghar, after completion of the conciliation proceedings, will submit his report on or by 11th February, 2013. Put up this case on 13th February, 2013 along with the report of the Conciliator. Till that date, police will not arrest the pet...
- ‹ Prev
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 9
- 10
- 11
- 12
- 13
- Next ›
- Last »