Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Aruna Devi Vs. State of Jharkhand and ors

Aruna Devi vs State of Jharkhand and ors

Type Court Judgment Court Jharkhand Decided Dec 19, 2012
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/972340

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Jharkhand High Court
Decided On
Subject
Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue
Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Aruna Devi

Respondent

State of Jharkhand and ors

Excerpt

inthehighcourtofjharkhandatranchi w.p.(s)no.3104of2011 arunadevi ... petitioner versus thestateofjharkhand&ors. ... ... respondents coram: honblemr.justicealoksingh forthepetitioner :mr.rajeevkumar,advocate forthestate :mr.jayshankartiwary,j.c.tos.c.i i.a.no.3114of2011 06/19.12.2012 thisisanapplicationseekingimpleadmentinthewritpetition.the applicants areclaimingthemselvesassonoflatemanindramishra.inthe present petition, mother of the applicants has sought directions for compassionate appointment to the elder son, ignoring the claims of the presentapplicants. forthereasonsstatedintheapplication,applicantsseemtobeproper andnecessaryparty.therefore,i.a.no.3114of2011isallowed. w.p.(s)no.3104of2011 petitioner is directed to amend the cause title of the petition by impleadingtheapplicantsaspartyrespondentnos.6and7onorbefore10th ofjanuary,2013,failingwhich,presentpetitionshallstandrejectedwithout furtherreferencetothebench. if amendment is carried out in the cause title, newly impleaded respondents may file their respective counter affidavits within next four weeks. rejoinder,ifany,maybefiledwithinfourweeksthereafter. (aloksingh,j.) manish

Full Judgment

INTHEHIGHCOURTOFJHARKHANDATRANCHI W.P.(S)No.3104of2011 ArunaDevi ... Petitioner Versus TheStateofJharkhand&Ors. ... ... Respondents CORAM: HONBLEMR.JUSTICEALOKSINGH ForthePetitioner :Mr.RajeevKumar,Advocate FortheState :Mr.JayShankarTiwary,J.C.toS.C.I I.A.No.3114of2011 06/19.12.2012 Thisisanapplicationseekingimpleadmentinthewritpetition.The applicants areclaimingthemselvesassonofLateManindraMishra.Inthe present petition, mother of the applicants has sought directions for compassionate appointment to the elder son, ignoring the claims of the presentapplicants. Forthereasonsstatedintheapplication,applicantsseemtobeproper andnecessaryparty.Therefore,I.A.No.3114of2011isallowed. W.P.(S)No.3104of2011 Petitioner is directed to amend the cause title of the petition by impleadingtheapplicantsaspartyRespondentNos.6and7onorbefore10th ofJanuary,2013,failingwhich,presentpetitionshallstandrejectedwithout furtherreferencetotheBench. If amendment is carried out in the cause title, newly impleaded respondents may file their respective counter affidavits within next four weeks. Rejoinder,ifany,maybefiledwithinfourweeksthereafter. (AlokSingh,J.) Manish

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial