Jharkhand Court December 2012 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
NasiruddIn Ansari and ors. Vs. State of Jharkhand and ors.
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Dec-19-2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W. P. (S) No. 6614 of 2003 Nasirduddin Ansari & Ors. Petitioners -V e r s u s- The State of Jharkhand and Ors. Respondents. CORAM: - HONBLE MR. JUSTICE APARESH KUMAR SINGH. For the Petitioner : - None. For the Respondents : - JC to Sr. SC-I 09/19.12.2012 No one appears on behalf of the petitioner. However, counsel for the respondents-State is present. From the order dated 11.07.2012, it appears that none was present even in the revised call and in the interest of justice, the case was adjourned for five weeks and again the case was adjourned on the request of the petitioner's counsel on the subsequent date. In that view of the matter, by way of last indulgence, list this case in the week commencing third week of January, 2013. (Aparesh Kumar Singh, J.) Kamlesh/Tanuj...
Urmila Devi Vs. Steel Authority of India Ltd.and
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Dec-19-2012
INTHEHIGHCOURTOFJHARKHANDATRANCHI W.P.(S)No.2108of2010 UrmilaDevi ... Petitioner Versus TheSteelAuthorityofIndiaLtd.throughtheChief PersonnelManager,ChasnallaColliery,Dhanabd&Ors. ... Respondents CORAM: HONBLEMR.JUSTICEALOKSINGH ForthePetitioner :Mr.H.P.Singh,Advocate FortheRespondents :Mr.AnandaSen,Advocate I.A.No.3612of2012 12/19.12.2012 Learned counsel for the applicant does not want to press this application. Accordingly,presentapplicationisdismissedasnotpressed. (AlokSingh,J.) Manish...
Mahabir Yadav Alias Mahabir Vs. the State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Dec-19-2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A.No. 3779 o1. Mahabir Yadav @ Mahabir.2. Jago Yadav.3. Rameshwar Yadav.4. Brahamdeo Yadav.5. Guru Sahay Yadav.6. Prakash Yadav. ... ... ...Petitioners -Versus- 1. The State of Jharkhand.2. Daso Mahto. ... ... ...Opp. Parties ---------- CORAM: THE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE D.N.UPADHYAY For the Petitioner: Mr. Deepak Kumar, Advocate. For the State: A.P.P. For the O.P.No.2: Mr. Jay Prakash, Sr. Advocate. ---------- 05/ 19.12.2012 The petitioners are accused in a case registered under Sections 420/467/468/120B/323 and 504 of the Indian Penal Code. It is alleged in the Complaint that accused nos. 1 to 5 sold a piece of land belonging to the complainant to accused no.6 and in the deed of conveyance accused no.7 was the witness. It is submitted that the complainant and the accused persons are agnates and the partition of the property has not been properly done. As a matter of fact, they have sold the land belonging to their share. It is purely a case of ...
Namal Soren Vs. State of Jharkhand and ors
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Dec-19-2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr. M.P. No. 647 of 2012 Namal Soren ...... Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand 2. Sarojini Soren 3. Hari Das Marandi 4. Sarbeshwar Soren 5. Samuel Soren 6. Soilen Hembrom 7. Sushila Marandi ...... Opposite Parties -------- CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D. N. PATEL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRASHANT KUMAR -------- For the petitioner: Mr. Gautam Kumar, Advocate For the State: Mr. Shekhar Sinha, APP For respondents 2 to 7: Md. Abdul Haque, Advodate Order No. 11: Dated 19th December, 2012 Per D.N.Patel, J.1. The present Criminal Misc. Petition has been preferred by the petitioner (original complainant) for getting leave to appeal against the judgment and order of acquittal, passed by learned Sessions Judge-I, Pakur, in Cr. Appeal No. 78 of 2008 dated 4th February, 2012, whereby, the learned Sessions Judge-I, Pakur, has quashed and set aside the judgment and order of conviction and sentence, passed by learned Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Pakur, in...
Santosh Gupta Vs. the State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Dec-19-2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A.No.3381 of 2012 Santosh Gupta. ... ... ...Petitioner -Versus- The State of Jharkhand. ... ... ...Opp. Party ---------- CORAM: THE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE D.N.UPADHYAY For the Petitioner: Mr. A.K.Kashyap, Sr. Advocate. For the State: A.P.P. ---------- 03/ 19.12.2012 The petitioner is an accused in a case registered under Sections 379/401 of the Indian Penal Code and under Sections 4/14 of the Mines and Minerals Act, pending in the Court of Civil Judge, (Junior Division)-III, Garhwa. It reveals from the written report that Tractor and Trailer belonging to the petitioner was found carrying boulders without valid document. It is submitted that the boulders were transported on valid Challan as per Annexure-2/1. There is no theft report. Since the Trailer attached to the Tractor belonging to the petitioner was plying without number plate and carrying boulders and no paper was produced at the time of seizure, I do not feel inclined to consider the pra...
Pradeep Kumar Vs. State of Jharkhand Through Cbi
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Dec-19-2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr. M.P. No. 2623 of 2012 Pradeep Kumar ..... Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand through CBI .. Opposite Party -------- CORAM : HONBLE MR. JUSTICE H. C. MISHRA ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Biswajit Mukherjee, Advocate For the CBI : Mr. Md. Mokhtar Khan, S.C. (CBI) ------ 2/ 19.12.2012 This criminal miscellaneous petition has been filed for modification of order dated 5.11.2012 passed in B.A. No. 6657 of 2012, whereby, the petitioner was granted provisional bail for treatment of his son, who had been advised for brain biopsy. The petitioner was directed to be released on provisional bail up to 5th January 2013 for treatment of his son. This petition has been filed for extension of the period of provisional bail bringing on record that the date has been fixed at AIIMS for biopsy of his son on 20.3.2013. It has also been pointed out that MRI scan of his brain has to take place on 21.1.2013. Accordingly, prayer has been made for extension o...
Raju Sao and anr Vs. the State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Dec-19-2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 9618 o1. Raju Sao 2. Bajrang Prajapati ..... Petitioners Versus The State of Jharkhand . Opposite Party CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE H. C. MISHRA For the Petitioners :Mr. K. P. Choudhary For the State :A. P.P. ----- 02/19.12.2012 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.P.P. for the Prosecution. Petitioners have been made accused for the offence under Sections 392, 411 of the Indian Penal Code, in connection with Jugsalai (Bagbera) P.S. Case No. 348 of 2012, corresponding to G.R. No. 2772 of 2012. The case relates to robbery. In the facts and circumstances of the case, I am inclined to release the petitioners on bail. Accordingly, the petitioners Raju Sao and Bajrang Prajapati are directed to be released on bail, on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Jamshedpur, in connection with Jugsalai (Bagbera) P....
Sardar Rabindra Singh and anr Vs. State of Jharkhand and anr
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Dec-19-2012
In the High Court of Jharkhand at Ranchi Cr.M.P. No.686 o1. Sardar Rabindra Singh 2. M/s. Raj Mohinder Kaur................Petitioners VERSUS State of Jharkhand and another ... .Opposite Parties CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE R.R.PRASAD For the Petitioners:Mr. R.S.Majumdar, Sr. Advocate For the State :A.P.P For the O.P.No.2 : Mr.Manish Kumar, Advocate 5/ 19.12.12. Learned counsel appearing for the opposite party no.2 submits that he was supposed to file counter affidavit but the counter affidavit could not be filed. However, the same would be filed within three weeks. As prayed for, let this matter be posted on 15.1.2013. Till then, interim order passed on 5.12.2012 shall continue. (R.R.Prasad, J.) ND/...
Md.israil Asnsari ? Md. Israil Vs. Ehsanullah ? Ehsan Ansari and or
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Dec-19-2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P. (C) No. 4790 of 2011 Md. Israil Ansari @ Md. Israil ....Petitioner Versus Ehsanullah @ Ehsan Ansari & others Respondents -------- Coram: THE HONBLE MR JUSTICE P.P. BHATT -------- For the Petitioner : Mr. Baa Rami Praphul, Advocate For the Respondents : /19.12.2012: Mr. Baa Rami Praphul, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, under the instruction received from his client, seeks permission to withdraw this writ petition, as the matter is amicably settled between the parties. Permission, as sought for, is hereby granted. Accordingly, this writ petition stands disposed of as withdrawn. . (P.P. Bhatt, J.) S.B....
Sanju Devi Vs. Collectariate
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Dec-19-2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(C) No.5915 of 2012 Sanju Devi . Petitioner Versus State of Jharkhand & Ors. ...Respondents Coram : The Honble Mr. Justice Narendra Nath Tiwari For the Petitioner : Mr. A.K.Sahani, Advocate For the Respondents : Mr. P.K.Singh, G.P.VI ----- 2/19.12.2012 In this writ petition, the petitioner has prayed for quashing the order dated 16.04.2012 passed by respondent no.3, whereby the PDS licence of the petitioner has been cancelled. When this case is taken up, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner has preferred statutory appeal against the said order and the same is pending before the Deputy Commissioner, Palamau, as stated in the writ petition. Learned counsel for the respondents submitted that in view of pendency of the appeal, this writ petition is not maintainable. Considering that the petitioner has preferred appeal against the said order dated 16.04.2012 and, according to the petitioner, the same is pending before ...
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- 12
- Next ›
- Last »