Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Sanju Devi Vs. Collectariate

Sanju Devi vs Collectariate

Type Court Judgment Court Jharkhand Decided Dec 19, 2012
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/972222

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Jharkhand High Court
Decided On
Subject
Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue
Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Sanju Devi

Respondent

Collectariate

Excerpt

in the high court of jharkhand at ranchi w.p.(c) no.5915 of 2012 sanju devi . petitioner versus state of jharkhand & ors. ...respondents coram : the honble mr. justice narendra nath tiwari for the petitioner : mr. a.k.sahani, advocate for the respondents : mr. p.k.singh, g.p.vi ----- 2/19.12.2012 in this writ petition, the petitioner has prayed for quashing the order dated 16.04.2012 passed by respondent no.3, whereby the pds licence of the petitioner has been cancelled. when this case is taken up, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner has preferred statutory appeal against the said order and the same is pending before the deputy commissioner, palamau, as stated in the writ petition. learned counsel for the respondents submitted that in view of pendency of the appeal, this writ petition is not maintainable. considering that the petitioner has preferred appeal against the said order dated 16.04.2012 and, according to the petitioner, the same is pending before the deputy commissioner, palamau-respondent no.2, this writ petition is disposed of directing the respondent no.2 to dispose of the petitioner's appeal expeditiously, preferably within two months from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order. ( narendra nath tiwari, j.) s.b.

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(C) No.5915 of 2012 Sanju Devi . Petitioner Versus State of Jharkhand & Ors. ...Respondents Coram : The Honble Mr. Justice Narendra Nath Tiwari For the Petitioner : Mr. A.K.Sahani, Advocate For the Respondents : Mr. P.K.Singh, G.P.VI ----- 2/19.12.2012 In this writ petition, the petitioner has prayed for quashing the order dated 16.04.2012 passed by respondent no.3, whereby the PDS licence of the petitioner has been cancelled. When this case is taken up, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner has preferred statutory appeal against the said order and the same is pending before the Deputy Commissioner, Palamau, as stated in the writ petition. Learned counsel for the respondents submitted that in view of pendency of the appeal, this writ petition is not maintainable. Considering that the petitioner has preferred appeal against the said order dated 16.04.2012 and, according to the petitioner, the same is pending before the Deputy Commissioner, Palamau-respondent no.2, this writ petition is disposed of directing the respondent no.2 to dispose of the petitioner's appeal expeditiously, preferably within two months from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order. ( Narendra Nath Tiwari, J.) s.b.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial