Jharkhand Court December 2012 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Manish Kumar Vs. State of Jharkhand and anr
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Dec-19-2012
INTHEHIGHCOURTOFJHARKHANDATRANCHI Cr.M.P.No.1437of2012 ManishKumar .... .... . Petitioner Versus 1.TheStateofJharkhand 2.PriyankaDeo .... .... . OppositeParties CORAM :HON'BLEMRS.JUSTICEJAYAROY ForthePetitioner :Mr.B.MTripathy,Sr.Advocate Mr.DilipKumarKarmakar,Advocate FortheState :A.P.P. 04/19.12.2012 Heardlearnedcounselforthepetitioner. Issuenoticetotheoppositepartyno.2intheadmission matter at her present and correct address by registered post with A/Daswellasbyordinaryprocess,forwhichrequisitesetc.mustbe filed by 21st December, 2012 failing which this application shall standrejectedwithoutfurtherreferencetotheBench. Till further order, police will not arrest the petitioner namelyManishKumarinconnectionwiththepresentcasei.e.C/1 Case No. 417 of 2011 pending before Shri B.B. Singh, Judicial Magistrate,1stClass,Jamshedpur. However, trial Court is directed to not to proceed in connectionwithaforesaidcase. (JayaRoy,J.) Anit...
Smt.Swatantri Devi Vs. Kanti Devi and Others
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Dec-19-2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI C.M.P. No. 52 of 2007 Smt. Swatantri Devi .. Petitioner Versus Kanti Devi & Others .. Respondents ----- CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE NARENDRA NATH TIWARI ----- For the Petitioner - None For the Respondents - Mr. Amaresh Kumar ----- 15/19.12.2012 I. A. No. 1800/2007 Nobody appears on behalf of the petitioner to press this application. Learned counsel for the respondents appears. The matter is petty old and the application is of the year 2007. This application is, accordingly, rejected as not pressed. S.K (NARENDRA NATH TIWARI, J)...
Rajendra Das Vs. the State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Dec-19-2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 8721 of 2012. --- Rajendra Das ... ... Applicant Versus The State of Jharkhand ... ... Opposite party. --- CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK SINGH --- For the Applicant : Mr. Sanjay Kumar, Advocate. For the Opposite Party : Mr. Mukesh Bihari Lal, A.P.P. --- 03/19.12.2012 The present application is moved, seeking regular bail in Jasidih P.S. Case No. 130 of 2012, corresponding to G.R. No. 563 of 2012 for the offence punishable under Sections 302 and 201 of the Indian Penal Code. Learned counsel for the applicant-accused has vehemently argued that the applicant is not named in the F.I.R and the applicant has been implicated in the present case on the basis of confessional statement of the co-accused namely Kamaldeo Das. He has submitted that nothing was recovered at the possession of the applicant. He has further submitted that there is no eye witness and the only evidence against the applicant is alleged confessional statement of the co- ...
Prem Kumar Gupta Vs. the State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Dec-19-2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No. 3387 of 2012 Prem Kumar Gupta .... Petitioner(s) Versus State of Jharkhand & another ... Opposite Parties Coram : HONBLE MR. JUSTICE D.N.UPADHYAY For the petitioner (s): Mr. Anil Kumar Sinha For the opposite party : Addl.P.P. 19.12.2012 After seeking consent from both sides, petitioner as well as the complainant are directed to appear before the Mediation Centre Civil Court, Hazaribagh on 07.01.2013. The Mediator/Conciliator shall make all efforts to settle the matter between the parties and thereafter send the result of conciliation to this Court . Put up this case under the same heading after receipt of the aforesaid report on 15.01.2013 Till the next date, interim order passed on 15.10.2012 shall continue. Ambastha/- ( D.N.Upadhyay,J.)...
Smt Raj Kishore Alias Smt Raj Kishori Devi Vs. the State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Dec-19-2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A.No.3816 of 2012 Smt. Raj Kishore @ Smt. Raj Kishori Devi. ... ...Petitioner -Versus- 1. The State of Jharkhand.2. Sanjay Kumar Jha. ... ... ...Opp. Parties ---------- CORAM: THE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE D.N.UPADHYAY For the Petitioner: Mr. Mukesh Kumar, Advocate. For the State: A.P.P. ---------- 04/ 19.12.2012 The petitioner is an accused in a case registered under Sections 406/420/504/34 of the Indian Penal Code. There is allegation in the Complaint that son and daughter-in-law of the petitioner had taken loan to the extent of Rs. 25,00,000/- from the Complainant on the assurance that if they fail to repay the loan amount, the property standing in the name of this petitioner would be transferred to the Complainant. When the Complainant did not get the money returned and no sale-deed was executed, he has lodged this case. It is submitted that accused no.2 & 3 have been granted bail by the court- below. It is admitted case of the prosecution that...
Sunil Kumar Singh Vs. Steel Authority of India Ltd.
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Dec-19-2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W. P. (S) No. 1734 of 2004 Sunil Kumar Singh Petitioner -V e r s u s- Steel Authority of India Ltd and Ors. Respondents. With W. P. (S) No. 1735 of 2004 Deo Kumar Sah Petitioner -V e r s u s- Steel Authority of India Ltd and Ors. Respondents. CORAM: - HONBLE MR. JUSTICE APARESH KUMAR SINGH. For the Petitioner : - Mr. Naresh Kumar Singh (In both cases) For the Respondents : - Mr. Ananda Sen(In both cases) 16/19.12.2012 Heard learned counsel for the parties. These petitioners have come before this court seeking quashing of reasoned order contained at Annexure-5 passed in their respective cases dated 04/06.11.2003 and 04/06.11.2003 by which their claim for compassionate appointment have been rejected. The case of these petitioners is that their fathers, who were permanent employees of the respondent's company, died in harness on 09.11.1997 and 20.12.1998 respectively. They had earlier came before this Court in C.W.J.C. No. 4299 of 2000, which was d...
Br.Manager, National Insurance Vs. Om Prakash Bhuwania and ors
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Dec-19-2012
INTHEHIGHCOURTOFJHARKHANDATRANCHI C.M.P.364of2010 TheBranchManager,NationalInsuranceCompany Limited,Dumka Petitioner Versus OmPrakashBhuwaniaandothers ... ... ... Respondents CORAM: HON'BLEMR.JUSTICED.N.PATEL HON'BLEMR.JUSTICEPRASHANTKUMAR FortheAppellants: None FortheRespondent: None OrderNo.2/Dated:19 th December2012 PerD.N.Patel,J1) When the matter is called out, nobody appeared on behalf of the petitioner,neitherthematterismentioned.2) Accordingly,thisC.M.P.isdismissedfordefault. (D.N.Patel,J) (PrashantKumar,J) Raman/Binit...
Rajnath Singh Vs. the State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Dec-19-2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B. A. No 8812 of 2012 --- Rajnath Singh ... Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand Opposite Party --- CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK SINGH --- For the Petitioner : Mr. A.K. Kashyap, Sr. Advocate : M/s. Lina Shakti, Anurag Kashyap For the Opposite Party : Mr. Shree Prakash Jha, A.P.P. --- 02 /19.12.2012 Present Bail application is moved seeking regular bail in connection with Dhurwa P.S. Case No.99 of 2012, corresponding to G.R. No.2638 of 2012 registered under Sections 302/201/34 of the Indian Penal Code. Mr. Kashyap, learned senior advocate appearing for the petitioner submits that the main accused namely, Dr. Shashi Bhushan Prakash Mehta has already been enlarged on bail vide order dated 24.09.2012 passed in B.A. No.6043 of 2012. He further submits that the another accused namely, Dharmendra Kumar Thakur @ Bholi @ Bhola has also been enlarged on bail vide order dated 27.11.2012 passed in B.A. No.8180 of 2012. He further submits that the ro...
Jasuran Bibi Vs. the State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Dec-19-2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No.3735 of 2012 ---- 1.Jahuran Bibi 2.Chhotu Ansari .... ... ... .... Petitioners ---Versus--- The State of Jharkhand .........Opposite Party ---- CORAM: HON'BLE MRS.JUSTICE JAYA ROY ---- For the Petitioners : Mr. Ram Chandra Prasad Sah, Advocate For the State : A.P.P. ---- 3 / 19.12.2012 Heard the counsel for the petitioner and the counsel for the State. The petitioners are accused in this case registered under Section 323, 353, 506, 120B of the I.P.C., pending in the court of Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bermo at Tenughat. Counsel for the petitioners has submitted that except Section 353 I.P.C., all other Sections are bailable in nature. Counsel for the State has submitted that the petitioners have obstructed the informant from doing the official work. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, both the petitioners, above named, are directed to surrender before the trial court /court below within a period of one month...
Vivek Kumar Alias Bablu Vs. the State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Dec-19-2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B. A. No 8799 of 2012 --- Vivek Kumar @ Bablu ... Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand Opposite Party --- CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK SINGH --- For the Petitioner : Mr. Nilesh Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party : Mr. Pramod Kr. Choudhary, A.P.P. --- 02 /19.12.2012 Present Bail application is moved seeking regular bail in connection with Chatra Sadar P.S. Case No.124 of 2012, corresponding to G.R. No.565 of 2012 registered under Sections 302/120B of the Indian Penal Code and 27 of Arms Act. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in the present case under Sections 302/120B of the Indian Penal Code. He further submits that the petitioner is in judicial custody with effect from 23.07.2012 and after investigation, charge-sheet has already been submitted in the present case. Learned counsel for the petitioner has placed reliance on the judgment of the Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of St...
- ‹ Prev
- 11
- 12
- 13
- 14
- 15
- 16
- 18
- 19
- 20
- 21
- Next ›
- Last »