Jharkhand Court December 2012 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Sandeep Banerjee Vs. the State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Dec-19-2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No. 3761 o1. Sandeep Banerjee 2. Soma Banerjee ... ... Petitioners Versus The State of Jharkhand ... ... ... Opposite Party --- CORAM : HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE JAYA ROY For the Petitioners : Mr. Chandrajit Mukherjee, Advocate For the State : A. P. P. 03/19.12.2012 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the State. Petitioners are apprehending their arrest in connection with the case registered under Sections 374, 323, 324, 326, 342, 504 and 341 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 3 (1) (X) (vi) of the S.T. & S.C. (Prevention of Atrocities) Act and Section 16 of the Bonded Labour Act and Section 23 of the Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection) Act in connection with Lalpur P.S. Case No. 195 of 2012 corresponding to G.R. No. 3984 of 2012, pending in the Court of Judicial Magistrate, Ranchi. Learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that it will not come under S.C. & S.T. Act as because nothing has been alleg...
Bihar Hard Coke Mazdoor Congre Vs. M/S Coal India Limited and ors
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Dec-19-2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.C. No. 2815 of 2011 Bihar Hard Coke Mazdoor Congress ......Petitioner Versus M/s Coal India Limited & Ors. .Respondents ----- Coram:HONBLE MR. JUSTICE NARENDRA NATH TIWARI For the Petitioner : Mr. Mahesh Tiwari, Advocate For the Respondents : Mr.Rajesh Lala, Advocate ----- I.A. No. 3570/2012 10/19.12.2012 In this I.A., the petitioner seeks permission to allow the applicants to join as petitioners in the writ petition, who are also desirous for joining as petitioners and have executed Vakalatnama, which has been filed with the I.A. It has been stated that the said intervenors are also aggrieved by the order which has been challenged and are also desirous of making same prayer before this Court as has been prayed in the writ petition by the petitioner. It has further been stated that petitioners have got same grievance which are based on same facts, which have already been stated in the writ petition. They seek the same relief. Since the griev...
Amit Banerjee Vs. Jharkhand State Electricity Bo
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Dec-19-2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P. (S) No. 2142 of 2004 --- Amit Banerjee --- --- --- ---- Petitioner Versus Jharkhand State Electricity Board & others --- --- Respondents --- CORAM: The Honble Mr. Justice Aparesh Kumar Singh For the Petitioner: Mrs. Ritu Kumar, Advocate --- 13/ 19.12.2012 From the submission of the parties, it appears that this writ petition has been rendered infructuous. Accordingly, it is dismissed as not pressed. I.A. No. 1167 of 2004 stands disposed of. (Aparesh Kumar Singh, J) Ranjeet/...
Prabhat Kumar Vs. State of Jharkhand and ors
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Dec-19-2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P. (S) No. 4381 of 2007 --- Prabhat Kumar --- --- --- ---- Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand & others --- ---- --- Respondents --- CORAM: The Honble Mr. Justice Aparesh Kumar Singh For the Petitioner: Mr. Ayush Aditya, Advocate For the State: JC to SC-1 --- I.A. No. 3176/2012 04/ 19.12.2012 The petitioner prays for and is allowed to implead the Director, Secondary Education, Department of Human Resources Development, Government of Jharkhand, Ranchi as respondent no. 7 in the instant writ application which shall be carried out within course of the day by the counsel for the petitioner. Heard counsel for the parties.2. The petitioner has approached this court for directing the respondents to pay the arrears of salary for July and August' 2006, for grant of annual increment, benefit of first Assurer Career Progresion scheme as also the Travelling Allowance.3. According to the petitioner, he was appointed as a Instructor in the erstwhile St...
Babloo Khatik Alias Sanjay Kumar Swarnkar Vs. the State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Dec-19-2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B. A. No. 8778 of 2012 --- Bablu Khatik alias Babloo Khatik alias Sanjay Kumar Swarnkar Applicant Versus The State of Jharkhand Opposite Party --- CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK SINGH --- For the Applicant : Mr. Deepak Kumar , Advocate For the Opposite Party : Mr. Pranay Kr. Sinha, A.P.P. --- 2/19.12.2012 This is an application seeking regular bail in connection with Koderma (Telaiya) P.S. Case No. 26 of 2012 corresponding to G.R. No. 707 of 2012 for the offence punishable under Sections 306 of the Indian Penal Code. Learned counsel for the applicant has vehemently argued that harassment or cruelty without there being any mens rea to derive the deceased to commit suicide would not amount to abetment as defined under Section 107 of I.P.C. He further contends that applicant is in judicial custody w.e.f. 3rd August 2012 and after investigation charge- sheet has already been submitted. Considering the totality of the facts and circumstances of the...
Bishwanath Singh Vs. Collectariate
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Dec-19-2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P. (C) No. 7082 of 2012 Bishwanath Singh ....Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand & another Respondents -------- Coram: THE HONBLE MR JUSTICE P.P. BHATT -------- /19.12.2012: Petitioner, by way of filing the present writ petition, under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, has prayed for issuance of an appropriate writ/ order/ direction for quashing and setting aside the order dated 18.10.2012, passed by the learned Civil Judge, Jr. Division-I, Jamshedpur in Title Suit No. 104 of 2012. Learned counsel appearing for the respondent- State Government seeks three weeks' time to file counter-affidavit in the matter. Request is granted. Put up this case on 16th of January, 2013. In the meantime, parties shall maintain status quo, as on today. . (P.P. Bhatt, J.) S.B....
Manisha Alias Chameli Vs. State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Dec-19-2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 8584 of 2012 Manisha @ Chameli @ Manisha Devi ..... Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand . Opposite Party CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE H. C. MISHRA For the Petitioner :Mr. Jyoti Prasad Sinha For the State :A. P.P. ----- 03/19.12.2012 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the Prosecution. Petitioner has been made accused for the offence under Sections 121(a), 384/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 17 C.L.A. Act and Section 10, 13 UAP Act, in connection with Bishnugarh P.S. Case No. 73 of 2012, corresponding to G.R. No. 1751 of 2012. From the F.I.R., it appears that the Police was informed that the extremists had assembled in a house and the said house was raided and one person fled away from the house, who he was apprehended and the house was searched. In course of search, the petitioner was also apprehended from the said house and from the said house some nuxal literatures and cash Rs. 3,82,000/- had been...
Satyanand Pd Jaiswal Vs. Human Resource Development
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Dec-19-2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W. P. (S) No. 7358 of 2012 --- Satyanand Pd. Jaiswal Petitioner Versus 1. State of Jharkhand 2. Principal Secretary, HRD Deptt., Ranchi 3. Director, Middle School, HRD Deptt., Ranchi 4. District Education Officer, Godda 5. Accountant General, Jharkhand, Ranchi 6. Principal, St. Francis High School, Godda Respondents --- CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK SINGH --- For the Petitioner : Mr. S. P. Roy, Advocate For the Respondents : Mr. Ajit Kumar, J.C. to G.P. IV --- 2/19.12.2012 Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that pension of the petitioner ought to have been fixed on the last pay drawn, however, pension of the petitioner was fixed on the lower pay-scale. He submits that despite moving several representations, annexure no. 3 colli, no decision has been taken thereon as yet. Mr. Ajit Kumar, learned J.C. to G.P. IV submits that let petitioner move a fresh detailed representation before the respondent no. 3 within 30 days from today and an ...
Pawan Kumar Ekka Vs. Central Coalfields Ltd. and ors
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Dec-19-2012
INTHEHIGHCOURTOFJHARKHANDATRANCHI W.P.(S)No.3568of2004 PawanKumarEkka...Petitioner Versus TheCentralCoalfieldsLimited&others......Respondents CORAM:HONBLEMR.JUSTICEAPARESHKUMARSINGH ForthePetitioner :Mr.NileshKumar,Adv. FortheRespondents:Mr.AnandaSen,Adv. 09/19.12.2012 Itissubmittedthatfromthecounteraffidavitfiledonbehalfof therespondents,itwouldappearthatthepetitionerhasbeenappointed oncompassionategroundandacopyoftheappointmentletterhasalso beenannexedasAnnexureAthereto. Inthatviewofthematter,thegrievancesofthepetitionerhave been redressed and as such the writ petition has been rendered as infructous.Accordingly,itisdisposedof. (ApareshKumarSingh,J) jk...
Etwa Oraon Vs. Chief Secretory
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Dec-19-2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W. P. (S) No. 7407 of 2012 --- Etwa Oraon Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand & others Respondents --- CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK SINGH --- For the Petitioner : M/s. A. K. Sahni & Amrita Banerjee, Advocate For the Respondents : Mr. Ajit Kumar, J.C. to G.P. IV --- 2/19.12.2012 Respondent nos. 2 & 3 are directed to calculate and pay the arrears of pension as claimed in the writ petition to the petitioner within four weeks positively, failing which respondent nos. 2 & 3 shall file their personal affidavits showing cause as to why payment has not been released in favour of the petitioner within next one week. (Alok Singh, J.) R.ShekharCp2...
- ‹ Prev
- 9
- 10
- 11
- 12
- 13
- 15
- 16
- 17
- 18
- 19
- Next ›
- Last »