Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Pawan Kumar Ekka Vs. Central Coalfields Ltd. and ors

Pawan Kumar Ekka vs Central Coalfields Ltd. and ors

Type Court Judgment Court Jharkhand Decided Dec 19, 2012
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/972382

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Jharkhand High Court
Decided On
Subject
Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue
Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Pawan Kumar Ekka

Respondent

Central Coalfields Ltd. and ors

Excerpt

inthehighcourtofjharkhandatranchi w.p.(s)no.3568of2004 pawankumarekka...petitioner versus thecentralcoalfieldslimited&others......respondents coram:honblemr.justiceapareshkumarsingh forthepetitioner :mr.nileshkumar,adv. fortherespondents:mr.anandasen,adv. 09/19.12.2012 itissubmittedthatfromthecounteraffidavitfiledonbehalfof therespondents,itwouldappearthatthepetitionerhasbeenappointed oncompassionategroundandacopyoftheappointmentletterhasalso beenannexedasannexureathereto. inthatviewofthematter,thegrievancesofthepetitionerhave been redressed and as such the writ petition has been rendered as infructous.accordingly,itisdisposedof. (apareshkumarsingh,j) jk

Full Judgment

INTHEHIGHCOURTOFJHARKHANDATRANCHI W.P.(S)No.3568of2004 PawanKumarEkka...Petitioner Versus TheCentralCoalfieldsLimited&others......Respondents CORAM:HONBLEMR.JUSTICEAPARESHKUMARSINGH ForthePetitioner :Mr.NileshKumar,Adv. FortheRespondents:Mr.AnandaSen,Adv. 09/19.12.2012 Itissubmittedthatfromthecounteraffidavitfiledonbehalfof therespondents,itwouldappearthatthepetitionerhasbeenappointed oncompassionategroundandacopyoftheappointmentletterhasalso beenannexedasAnnexureAthereto. Inthatviewofthematter,thegrievancesofthepetitionerhave been redressed and as such the writ petition has been rendered as infructous.Accordingly,itisdisposedof. (ApareshKumarSingh,J) jk

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial