Skip to content

Jharkhand Court December 2012 Judgments

Browse smarter

Open an 18-section brief on any judgment

Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.

  • AI Brief & Ask
  • Semantic AI Search
  • Devil's Bench

Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.

Dec 19 2012

Sakendra Kumar Mehta Vs. Personnel and Adminis Reform

Court: Jharkhand

Decided on: Dec-19-2012

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W. P. (S) No. 7338 of 2012 --- Sakendra Kumar Mehta Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand through the Secretary, Personnel Administrative Reforms & Rajbhasha Department, Ranchi 2. The Commissioner, Palamau 3. The Deputy Commissioner, Palamau 4. The Deputy Collector (Est.), Palamau 5. The Sub-Divisional Officer, Palamau Respondents --- CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK SINGH --- For the Petitioner : Mr. Prem Pujari Roy, Advocate For the Respondents : Mr. Rajesh Kumar, G.P. V --- 2/19.12.2012 Learned counsel appearing for the parties submit that present case is squarely covered by the judgment of this Court dated 31st July 2012 passed in W.P.S. No. 5924 of 2003, Ramesh Mahto Vs. State of Jharkhand & Others, therefore, present case be disposed of in the same terms. Order accordingly. (Alok Singh, J.) R.ShekharCp2...


Dec 19 2012

Mahendra Prasad Vs. State of Jharkhand and ors.

Court: Jharkhand

Decided on: Dec-19-2012

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W. P. (S) No. 6617 of 2003 Mahendra Prasad Petitioner -V e r s u s- The State of Jharkhand and Ors. Respondents. CORAM: - HONBLE MR. JUSTICE APARESH KUMAR SINGH. For the Petitioner : - None. For the Respondents : - JC to Sr. SC-I 07/19.12.2012 No one appears on behalf of the petitioner. However, counsel for the respondents-State is present. From the order dated 11.07.2012, it appears that none was present even in the revised call and in the interest of justice, the case was adjourned for five weeks and again the case was adjourned on the request of the petitioner's counsel on the subsequent date. In that view of the matter, by way of last indulgence, list this case in the week commencing third week of January, 2013. (Aparesh Kumar Singh, J.) Kamlesh/Tanuj...


Dec 19 2012

Smt.Chameli Devi Vs. M/S Bharat Coking Coal Ltd and O

Court: Jharkhand

Decided on: Dec-19-2012

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(S) No. 3153 of 2010 Smt. Chameli Devi ..... Petitioner Versus M/s. Bharat Coking Coal Limited & Ors. . Respondents CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK SINGH For the Petitioner : Mr. Prabir Chatterjee, Advocate For the Respondents : Mr. A.K. Saha, Advocate ----- 3 /19.12.2012 I.A. No. 1708 of 2012 By way of present interlocutory application, petitioner seeks impleadment of Chaiti Devi as Respondent No.4 in the writ petition. Impleadment, as sought for by the petitioner, seems to be justified for the fair adjudication of the case, as Chaiti Devi is a necessary party. For the reasons stated in the interlocutory application, I.A. No.1708 of 2012 is allowed. W.P.(S) No. 3153 of 2010 Let the necessary correction be carried out in the memo of parties on or before 5th January, 2013. Counter affidavit, if any, may be filed within four weeks. Rejoinder, if any, may be filed within four weeks thereafter. (Alok Singh, J.) R.K....


Dec 19 2012

Yugeshwar Sahu Vs. the State of Jharkhand

Court: Jharkhand

Decided on: Dec-19-2012

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 8687 of 2012 Yugeshwar Sahu ..... Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand . Opposite Party CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE H. C. MISHRA For the Petitioner :Mr. Kripa Shankar Nanda For the State :A. P.P. ----- 03/19.12.2012 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the Prosecution. Petitioner has been made accused for the offence under Sections 147, 148, 149, 452, 307 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act, in connection with Palkot P.S. Case No. 49 of 2012, corresponding to G.R. No. 625 of 2012. There is omnibus allegation against seven named accused persons to have committed mischief in the house of the informant and to have fired fire arms in which the grandmother and mother of the informant were injured. It is apparent that though the petitioner has been named in the F.I.R., but there is only omnibus allegation against the petitioner. In the facts and circumstances of the case, I am inclined to relea...


Dec 19 2012

Tabrej Khan Vs. the State of Jharkhand

Court: Jharkhand

Decided on: Dec-19-2012

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 9742 of 2012 Tabrej Khan ..... Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand . Opposite Party CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE H. C. MISHRA For the Petitioner :Mr. Abhay Kr. Chaturvedy For the State :A. P.P. ----- 02/19.12.2012 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the Prosecution. Petitioner has been made accused for the offence under Section 392, 411 of the Indian Penal Code, in connection with Ghaghra P.S. Case No. 44 of 2010, corresponding to G.R. No. 387 of 2010. The case relates to robbery. In the facts and circumstances of the case, I am inclined to release the petitioner on bail. Accordingly, the petitioner Tabrej Khan is directed to be released on bail, on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of Md. Umar, learned Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Gumla, or his successor, in connection with Ghaghra P.S. Case No. 44 of 2010, corresponding t...


Dec 19 2012

M/S Bharat Rubber Re-generatIn Vs. Jharkhand State Electricity Bo

Court: Jharkhand

Decided on: Dec-19-2012

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(L) No. 2429 of 2010 M/S Tata Iron and Steel Company Limited, Jamshedpur, through Sri A.K.Verma .. Petitioner Versus The concerned workman R.N.Singh .. Respondent ----- CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE NARENDRA NATH TIWARI ----- For the Petitioner - Mr. Rajiv Ranjan For the Respondent - Mr. S.K.Sinha ----- 12/19.12.2012 Learned counsel for the respondent-concerned workman prays for two weeks' time to file reply to I. A. No. 2437/2012. Prayer is allowed. Put up this case on 21.1.2013. Till then, no coercive action shall be taken against the petitioner pursuant to the impugned award dated 25.1.2010 rendered in Reference Case No. 10/1998 by learned Labour Court, Jamshedpur. S.K (NARENDRA NATH TIWARI, J)...


Dec 19 2012

Chhaku Soren ? Pradhan Soren and Vs. Hopna Marandi and ors

Court: Jharkhand

Decided on: Dec-19-2012

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P. (C) No.1504 of 2012 Chhaku Soren @ Pradhan Soren and Ors. ...Petitioners Versus Hopna Marandi and Others .....Respondents --- CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE P.P.BHATT For the Petitioners : Mr. Alok Lal, Adv. For the Respondent No. 3 : J.C. to S.C. (L & C) . --- Order No.07 Dated:19. h December, 2012. The petitioners, by way of filing the present writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, have prayed for setting aside order dated 10.2.2012 passed by Civil Judge-II, Rajmahal in Title Suit No. 7/08. Upon hearing the learned counsel for the petitioners and from perusal of impugned order as well as the documents annexed to this petition, issue urgent show cause notice to respondent Nos. 1 and 2, for which, requisites etc. under registered cover with A/D as well as ordinary process must be filed within two days. So far as notice upon respondent No. 3 is concerned, there is no need to issue notice upon him as he is represented by the...


Dec 19 2012

Bishnudeo Lal Das Vs. State of Jharkhand and ors

Court: Jharkhand

Decided on: Dec-19-2012

INTHEHIGHCOURTOFJHARKHANDATRANCHI W.P.(S)No.7636of2011 BishnudeoLalDass ... Petitioner Versus TheStateofJharkhandthroughitsSecretary&Ors.... ... Respondents CORAM: HONBLEMR.JUSTICEALOKSINGH ForthePetitioner :M/sG.B.Rao,RahulKumar,Advocates FortheState :Mr.AshishKumarShekhar,J.C.toG.P.VI I.A.No.550of2012andI.A.No.567of2012 05/19.12.2012 BywayofpresentI.As.,applicantsareseekingpermissiontointernvene inthepresentpetition. Learnedcounselforthepetitioner submits thatpetitioner isreadyto jointheapplicantsasprivaterespondents. Consequently,boththeI.As.areallowed. W.P.(S)No.7636of2011 Petitionerisdirectedtocarryoutthenecessaryamendmentinthecause titleofthepetitionbyimpleadingtheapplicantsaspartyRespondentNos.8 and9. Letnecessaryamendmentbeincorporatedinthememoofthepetition onorbefore10thofJanuary,2013. Mr.Indrajit Sinha and Mr.S.K. Dwivedi, Advocates, waive notice on behalfofnewlyimpleadedrespondents. Newly impleaded respondents may file their respective counter affidavitswithinnextfourweeks. ...


Dec 19 2012

Vijay Shankar and ors Vs. State of Jharkhand and anr

Court: Jharkhand

Decided on: Dec-19-2012

In the High Court of Jharkhand at Ranchi Cr.M.P. No.1722 of 2011 with Cr.M.P.No.1740 of 2011 Shiv Dutt Sharma @ Shambhu Sharma..Petitioner(Cr.M.P.1722 of 2011) 1.Vijay Shankar 2.Santosh Kumar Rai 3.Ravi Shankar Kumar 4.Sanjeev Kumar.....................................Petitioners(Cr.M.P.1740 of 2011) VERSUS State of Jharkhand through C.B.I and another ... .Opposite Parties CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE R.R.PRASAD For the Petitioners:Mr. P.P.N.Rai, Sr. Advocate For the State :A.P.P For the C.B.I :Mr.M.Khan 16/ 19.12.12. An interlocutory application bearing no.884 of 2012 and also an interlocutory application no.886 of 2012 have been filed in Cr.M.P.Nos. 1722 and 1740 of 2011 respectively whereby an order under which cognizance of the offences has been taken has been challenged. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that these two applications have been filed for quashing of the first information report but during pendency of these applications, charge sheet was submitted, up...


Dec 19 2012

Amit Banerjee Vs. Jharkhand State Electricity Bo

Court: Jharkhand

Decided on: Dec-19-2012

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P. (S) No. 2142 of 2004 --- Amit Banerjee --- --- --- ---- Petitioner Versus Jharkhand State Electricity Board & others --- --- Respondents --- CORAM: The Honble Mr. Justice Aparesh Kumar Singh For the Petitioner: Mrs. Ritu Kumar, Advocate --- 13/ 19.12.2012 From the submission of the parties, it appears that this writ petition has been rendered infructuous. Accordingly, it is dismissed as not pressed. I.A. No. 1167 of 2004 stands disposed of. (Aparesh Kumar Singh, J) Ranjeet/...


  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial