Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Smt.Chameli Devi Vs. M/S Bharat Coking Coal Ltd and O

Smt.Chameli Devi vs M/S Bharat Coking Coal Ltd and O

Type Court Judgment Court Jharkhand Decided Dec 19, 2012
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/972257

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Jharkhand High Court
Decided On
Subject
Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Education

Key legal issue
Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Smt.Chameli Devi

Respondent

M/S Bharat Coking Coal Ltd and O

Excerpt

in the high court of jharkhand at ranchi w.p.(s) no. 3153 of 2010 smt. chameli devi ..... petitioner versus m/s. bharat coking coal limited & ors. . respondents coram: honble mr. justice alok singh for the petitioner : mr. prabir chatterjee, advocate for the respondents : mr. a.k. saha, advocate ----- 3 /19.12.2012 i.a. no. 1708 of 2012 by way of present interlocutory application, petitioner seeks impleadment of chaiti devi as respondent no.4 in the writ petition. impleadment, as sought for by the petitioner, seems to be justified for the fair adjudication of the case, as chaiti devi is a necessary party. for the reasons stated in the interlocutory application, i.a. no.1708 of 2012 is allowed. w.p.(s) no. 3153 of 2010 let the necessary correction be carried out in the memo of parties on or before 5th january, 2013. counter affidavit, if any, may be filed within four weeks. rejoinder, if any, may be filed within four weeks thereafter. (alok singh, j.) r.k.

Full Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(S) No. 3153 of 2010 Smt. Chameli Devi ..... Petitioner Versus M/s. Bharat Coking Coal Limited & Ors. . Respondents CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK SINGH For the Petitioner : Mr. Prabir Chatterjee, Advocate For the Respondents : Mr. A.K. Saha, Advocate ----- 3 /19.12.2012 I.A. No. 1708 of 2012 By way of present interlocutory application, petitioner seeks impleadment of Chaiti Devi as Respondent No.4 in the writ petition. Impleadment, as sought for by the petitioner, seems to be justified for the fair adjudication of the case, as Chaiti Devi is a necessary party. For the reasons stated in the interlocutory application, I.A. No.1708 of 2012 is allowed. W.P.(S) No. 3153 of 2010 Let the necessary correction be carried out in the memo of parties on or before 5th January, 2013. Counter affidavit, if any, may be filed within four weeks. Rejoinder, if any, may be filed within four weeks thereafter. (Alok Singh, J.) R.K.

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial