Jharkhand Court October 2011 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Kanto Sharma Vs. State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Oct-11-2011
INTHEHIGHCOURTOFJHARKHANDATRANCHICr.(Jail)Appl.(DB)No.1109of2008KantoSharma..................... Versus StateofJharkhand Coram: HonbleMr.JusticeR.K.Merathia Appellant RespondentHon'bleMr.JusticeP.P.BhattFortheAppellant FortheState OrderNo.3 : :Mr.RaviPrakash,,APP Datedthe11October2011 th Seentheletterdated05/09/2011,sentbytheappellantfrom jailforfixinganearlydateofhearing. Mr. Ravi Prakash, learned counsel appearing for the State, fairlypointedoutthatinthesaidlettertheappellanthasstatedthatheis in jail custody since 13/05/2000, i.e. for more than 10 years; and that similarlysituatedcoaccusedhavealreadybeengrantedbailinconnected criminal appeals and, therefore, if there is no chance of hearing of the appeal,thisappellantmayalsobegrantedbail. Inthecircumstances,duringpendencyoftheappeal,appellant KantoSharmaisalsodirected tobereleased onbail onfurnishing bail bondsofRs.10,000/(tenthousand)withtwosuretiesofthelikeamount each to the satisfaction of the trial court (3rd Additional Sessions ...
Maheshwar Hembrom and ors Vs. State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Oct-11-2011
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr. Appeal (D.B.) No. 410 of 2007 --Maheshwar Hembrom @ Manishar Hembrom & Anr. ..Appellants -VersusThe State of Jharkhand. ..Respondent. --Coram: Honble Mr. Justice R.K. MerathiaHon'ble Mr. Justice P.P. BhattFor the Appellant: For the State: Order No. 06 --Mr. Mithilesh Singh, Adv. A.P.P. --Dated:11th October, 2011Vide letter dated 14.5.2011 sent by the appellants from Jail, it has been prayed for granting them bail during the pendency of this appeal and/or fixing an early date of hearing of this appeal. It was informed that the appellants are in jail custody for about six years. Under the circumstances, put up this case under the heading For Hearing according to the period of custody in the next Monthly Cause List. If this appeal is not taken up within a year, the appellants may be at liberty to move an application for their grant of bail during the pendency of this appeal.(R.K. Merathia, J.) (P.P. Bhatt, J.)Anu/-...
Jogendra Singh @ Don Vs. State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Oct-11-2011
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No.6845 of 2011 Jogendra Singh @ Don Versus The State of Jharkhand CORAM: . Opposite Party HONBLE MR. JUSTICE H.C. MISHRA : : Mr. K.P. Choudhary A. P.P. ..... PetitionerFor the Petitioner For the State 2/11.10.2011----Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the Petitioner has been made accused for the offence under Sections 379/411Prosecution. of the Indian Penal Code, in connection with Telco P.S. Case no.146 of 2011, corresponding to G.R. No.1235 of 2011. The case relates to theft of some part of a truck. In the facts and circumstances of the case, I am inclined to release the petitioner on bail. Accordingly, the petitioner Jogendra Singh @ Don is directed to be released on bail, on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class at Jamshedpur, in connection with Telco P.S. Case no.146 of 2011, correspondin...
Bachu Pasi and anr Vs. State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Oct-11-2011
THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr. Appeal ( DB) No. 465 of 2010 1. 2. Bachu Pasi. Mantu Pasi. Versus The State of Jharkhand Respondent -------Coram: THE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE R.K. MERATHIA THE HONBLE MR. JUSTICE P.P. BHATT -------For the Appellants : Mr. Jawahar Sah, Advocate For the State : APP -------Order No. 6 Dated the 11th October, 2011 Seen the medical report, in which the age of appellant no. 2-Mantu Pasi has been assessed between 18 to 24 years as on 14.9.2011. It was prayed on behalf of State counsel that in view of the huge gap, a fresh report may be called for. Accordingly, the Superintendent of concerned Jail is directed to get the age of appellant no. 2-Mantu Pasi determined by a Medical Board at Mahatma Gandhi Medical College, Jamshedpur. Put up this case after four weeks awaiting report. Let the order be sent by fax. ..Appellants( R.K. Merathia, J) ( P.P. Bhatt, J)Rakesh/...
Kalipado Singh Choudhary and ors Vs. State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Oct-11-2011
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No. 2714 of 2011 1. Kalipado Singh Choudhary @ Kalipad Singh Choudhary 2. Jawari Singh Choudhary 3. Arun Singh Choudhary 4. Lalit Singh Choudhary 5. Umesh Singh Choudhary 6. Parmeshwar Singh Choudhary 7. Madan Singh Choudhary 8. Upendra Singh Choudhary @ Upendra Nath Singh Choudhary 9. Jagdish Singh Choudhary @ Jagdish Choudhary 10.Anil Singh Choudhary ...... ...... Versus The State of Jharkhand .... ... .... ... HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE D.N. UPADHYAY -----For the Petitioners : Mr. S. Thakur, Advocate For the Opp. Party : A.P.P. ----/11.10.2011 Heard learned counsel for the parties. Petitioners are accused in a case registered under Sections 323 & 420/34 of the Indian Penal Code. It is alleged in the complaint that the petitioners had taken Rs.2 lakhs in advance from the complainant against sale of a piece of land. During verification the complainant could learn that the land is not free from encumbrances and forest officials have raised objec...
Onkar Singh @ Omkar Singh @ Sanni Singh @ Sanni Sardar Vs. State of Jh ...
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Oct-11-2011
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A No. 6827 of 2011 ------Onkar Singh @ Omkar Singh @ Sanni Singh @ Sanni Sardar .. -VersusThe State of Jharkhand CORAM : -----HONBLE MR. JUSTICE H.C.MISHRA -----For the Petitioner : Mr.A.K.Sahani, Advocate For the State : Mr.D.K.Prasad, A.P.P. ------Petitioner.... Opposite Party2/ 11.10.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel for the State. The petitioner has been made accused in Bokaro Steel City P.S case no.174 of 2011 corresponding to G.R No.638 of 2011 for the offence under Sections 399, 402, 413 and 414 of the Indian Penal Code. It appears that the petitioner along-with other culprits were apprehended by the police on a vehicle which was found to be stolen and it also appears that the petitioner and the co-accused persons admitted their involvement in some cases of road robbery , dacoity etc. From the possession of the petitioner, fire arm was also recovered, for which, it appears that separate case was insti...
Bhimsen Pingua @ Robert Pingua Vs. State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Oct-11-2011
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A No. 6922 of 2011 ------Bhimsen Pingua @ Robert Pingua .. Petitioner -VersusThe State of Jharkhand CORAM : ...... Opposite Party -----HONBLE MR. JUSTICE H.C.MISHRA -----For the Petitioner : Mr. R.P.Gupta, Advocate For the State : Ms.Anita Sinha, A.P.P. -----2/ 11.10.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel for the State. The petitioner has been made accused in Noamundi P.S case no.58 of 2010 corresponding to G.R No.434 of 2010, S.T No.176 of 2011 for the offence under Section 394 of the Indian Penal Code. The case relates to the robbery of Rs.6,50,000/- from the bank officials who were going to deposit the said amount in the ATM Box. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner is a guard of the ATM room and there is no recovery from the possession of the petitioner. The only allegation against the petitioner is that he was in the contact of the culprits. Learned counsel for the petitioner ...
Bijal @ Jawala Choudhary Vs. State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Oct-10-2011
INHIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B. A. No. 5667 of 2011 Bijal @ Jawala Choudhary @ Vijal Choudhary ..... Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand .. Opposite Party -------CORAM : HONBLE MR. JUSTICE H. C. MISHRA -----For the Petitioner : Mr. Madhusudan, Advocate For the State : Mr. S.K.Srivastava, A.P.P.------THE5/ 10.10.2011Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for The petitioner has been made accused for the offence underthe Prosecution. Section 395 of the Indian Penal Code, in connection with S.T. No. 398A of 2000 arising out of Meral P.S. Case No. 17 of 2000 ( G.R. No. 198 of 2000). The case relates to dacoity which was instituted against unknown. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case, there is no recovery from the petitioner and other co-accused has been acquitted after trial. Learned counsel has accordingly prayed for bail. In the facts of this case, I am inclined to enlarge the petiti...
Satya Singh and ors Vs. State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Oct-10-2011
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 6536 of 2011 1. Satya Singh 2. Ganesh Singh 3. Chandra Singh... Versus The State of Jharkhand . CORAM:Petitioners Opposite PartyHONBLE MR. JUSTICE H.C. MISHRA:Mr. J. Mazumdar :A. P.P. ----3/10.10.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.P.P. for the Prosecution. Petitioners have been made accused for the offence under Sections 364/34 of the Indian Penal Code, in connection with Parsudih (Sundar Nagar) P.S. Case No. 119 of 2010, corresponding to G.R. Case No. 1895 of 2010 (S. T. No. 22 of 2011). There is allegation against the petitioners and the other co-accused persons to have taken the deceased alongwith them and, thereafter, the deceased did not return. Learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that the petitioners have been falsely implicated in this case. So far as, the petitioners Satya Singh and Ganesh Singh are concerned, there is confessional statement of the co-accused against them, but there is no ...
Sujit Mandal @ Sujit Mumar Mandal Vs. State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Oct-10-2011
INHIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B. A. No. 6782 of 2011 Sujit Mandal @ Sujit Kumar Mandal ..... Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand .. Opposite Party -------CORAM : HONBLE MR. JUSTICE H. C. MISHRA -----For the Petitioner : Mr. A.K.Sahani, Advocate For the State : Mr. P.K.Sahay, A.P.P.------THE2/ 10.10.2011Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for The petitioner has been made accused for the offence underthe Prosecution. Sections 25 (1-B)(a), 26 and 35 of the Arms Act, in connection with Seraikella P.S. Case No. 47 of 2011 corresponding to G.R. No. 444 of 2011. The petitioner was apprehended on 7.6.2011 and from his possession, one live cartridge was recovered. In the facts of this case, I am inclined to enlarge the petitioner, Sujit Mandal @ Sujit Kumar Mandal, on bail. Accordingly, the petitioner, named above, is directed to be released on bail, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand), with two sureties of the like amount each, to the satis...
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- 12
- Next ›
- Last »