Satya Singh and ors Vs. State of Jharkhand

c-101, vasundhara apartments, dwarka, new delhi was purchased by the defendant in the name of the plaintiff and for her benefit. regarding property at l-4, connaught place, new delhi, it is alleged that the plaintiff has no right in the aforesaid property which belongs to the defendant. since the defendant is willing to give half of the rental income from the aforesaid house to the plaintiff after deducting the expenditure incurred on its upkeep and maintenance, the plaintiff is entitled to a decree of rendition of accounts with respect to the rental income earned by the defendant from h.no.670, ajit singh nagar mohali phase-ii, punjab. .....have taken the deceased alongwith them and, thereafter, the deceased did not return. learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that the petitioners have been falsely implicated in this case. so far as, the petitioners satya singh and ganesh singh are concerned, there is confessional statement of the co-accused against them, but there is no eye witness to the occurrence of murder of the deceased. so far as, the petitioner chandra singh is concerned, it appears that on the basis of confessional statement, one tabiz and one ring belonging to the deceased have been recovered from the house of this petitioner, which have been identified by the witnesses. learned a.p.p. opposed the prayer for bail. in the facts and circumstances of the case, i am inclined to release the petitioners satya singh and ganesh singh on bail. accordingly, they are directed to be released on bail, on furnishing bail bonds of rs.10,000/(rupees ten thousand) each with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of learned sessions judge, east singhbhum, jamshedpur in connection with parsudih (sundar nagar) p.s. case no. 119 of 2010, corresponding to g.r. case no. 1895 of 2010 (s. t. no. 22 of 2011). so far as, petitioner chandra singh is concerned, from his house the tabiz and ring of the deceased were recovered which were also identified by the witnesses. i am not inclined to release him on bail. accordingly, the prayer for bail of this petitioner is rejected. (h. c. mishra, j)umesh/-for the petitioners for the state