Anil Kumar Vs. State of Jharkhand and ors

Anil Kumar vs State of Jharkhand and ors

Type Court Judgment Court Jharkhand Decided Oct 10, 2011

~2 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/921840

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/921840
Court: Jharkhand High Court
Decided On: Oct 10, 2011
Subject: Education

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

C-101, Vasundhara Apartments, Dwarka, New Delhi was purchased by the defendant in the name of the plaintiff and for her benefit. Regarding property at L-4, Connaught Place, New Delhi, it is alleged that the plaintiff has no right in the aforesaid property which belongs to the defendant. Since the defendant is willin...

Key legal issue: Education

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Anil Kumar

Respondent

State of Jharkhand and ors

Excerpt

c-101, vasundhara apartments, dwarka, new delhi was purchased by the defendant in the name of the plaintiff and for her benefit. regarding property at l-4, connaught place, new delhi, it is alleged that the plaintiff has no right in the aforesaid property which belongs to the defendant. since the defendant is willing to give half of the rental income from the aforesaid house to the plaintiff after deducting the expenditure incurred on its upkeep and maintenance, the plaintiff is entitled to a decree of rendition of accounts with respect to the rental income earned by the defendant from h.no.670, ajit singh nagar mohali phase-ii, punjab. in the high court of jharkhand at ranchi w.p.(s) no.2825 of 2011 anil kumar .................................. .............. petitioner versus state of jharkhand and others...................respondents coram : hon'ble mr. justice r.r.prasadfor the petitioner : mr.umesh kumar choubey for the state : j.c to g.p.iii 3/ 10.10.11. i.a.no.2285 of 2011 learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that earlier an order passed on 13.5.2011 as contained in annexure 6a was sought tobe quashed but subsequently, that letter was withdrawn. thereafter another order has been passed on 21.7.2011 as contained in annexure 8 to the interlocutory application bearing no. 2285 of 2011 whereby the petitioner has been removed from the post of in-charge, headmaster and in his place another person has been appointed and therefore, an interlocutory application has been filed wherein prayer has been made to allow the petitioner to incorporate the prayer for quashing of the order as contained in said letter dated 21.7.2011. prayer made in the interlocutory application, in the facts and circumstances stated above, is allowed. let the interlocutory application form part of the main writ application. w.p.(s) no.2825 of 2011 as prayed for, three weeks' time is allowed for filing rejoinder to the interlocutory application. let this matter be listed on 16.11.2011.(r.r.prasad, j.)nd/

Full Judgment

In the High Court of Jharkhand at Ranchi W.P.(S) No.2825 of 2011 Anil Kumar .................................. .............. Petitioner VERSUS State of Jharkhand and others...................Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.R.PRASAD

For the Petitioner : Mr.Umesh Kumar Choubey For the State : J.C to G.P.III 3/ 10.10.11. I.A.No.2285 of 2011 Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that earlier an order passed on 13.5.2011 as contained in Annexure 6A was sought tobe quashed but subsequently, that letter was withdrawn. Thereafter another order has been passed on 21.7.2011 as contained in Annexure 8 to the Interlocutory Application bearing no. 2285 of 2011 whereby the petitioner has been removed from the post of In-charge, Headmaster and in his place another person has been appointed and therefore, an Interlocutory application has been filed wherein prayer has been made to allow the petitioner to incorporate the prayer for quashing of the order as contained in said letter dated 21.7.2011. Prayer made in the Interlocutory application, in the facts and circumstances stated above, is allowed. Let the Interlocutory application form part of the main writ application. W.P.(S) No.2825 of 2011 As prayed for, three weeks' time is allowed for filing rejoinder to the Interlocutory application. Let this matter be listed on 16.11.2011.

(R.R.Prasad, J.)

ND/

Same Court & Year Jharkhand · 2011 Same Parties Anil Kumar vs State of Jharkhand and ors Same Subject Education

Education