Jharkhand Court October 2011 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Monika Mani Vs. Jharkhand State Electricity Bo
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Oct-10-2011
INTHEHIGHCOURTOFJHARKHANDATRANCHI W.P .(S)No.3591of2008 MonikaMani ... Petitioner VersusTheJharkhandStateElectricityBoard&others...Respondents; CORAM: HON'BLEMR.JUSTICED.N.PATEL ForthePetitioner: M/sManojTandon,ShivShankarKumar FortheRespondents:Mrs.I.SenChoudhury th 06:Dated10October,2011 1. 2. Rule. CounselfortherespondentswaivesnoticeofRule.(D.N.Patel,J.)VK...
Nirmal Prasad Chaudhary Vs. J.S.E.B. and ors
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Oct-10-2011
INTHEHIGHCOURTOFJHARKHANDATRANCHI W.P .(S)No.6410of2008 NirmalPrasadChaudhary ... Petitioner VersusJharkhandStateElectricityBoard&others...Respondents; CORAM: HON'BLEMR.JUSTICED.N.PATEL ForthePetitioner:None th 13:Dated10October,2011 1. Whenthematteriscalledout,learnedcounselforthepetitionerisabsent.Neitherthematterismentioned,noranybodyappearedonbehalf ofthepetitioner. 2. Hence,thematterisdismissedfordefault.(D.N.Patel,J.)VK...
Sabitri Kumari Vs. State of Jharkhand and anr
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Oct-10-2011
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr. Rev. No. 350 of 2011 --Sabitri Kumari ..Petitioner -VersusThe State of Jharkhand and Anr. ..Opp. Parties. --Coram: Honble Mr. Justice R.K. Merathia --For the Petitioner(s): Mr. J. Dubey, Adv. For the State: A.P.P. For Opp. Party No. 2: Mr. Awanish Ranjan Mishra, Adv. --Order No. 09 Dated:10th October, 2011 Mr. Awanish Ranjan Mishra, learned counsel appearing on behalf of Opp. Party No. 2 , Sanjay Ravidas, submitted that he is ready to pay the fine of rupees one lac, imposed by the trial court, to the petitioner and he is also ready to withdraw Cr. Appeal (S.J.) No. 167/2011, filed against the imposition of such fine. Mr. J. Dubey, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submitted on instruction that the petitioner accepts such offer. Mr. Mishra, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of Opp. Party No. 2 handed over a draft of Rs. 50,000/- (fifty thousand) to Mr. J. Dubey, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of petitioner i...
Smt. Surji PaharIn and ors Vs. State of Jharkhand and ors
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Oct-10-2011
In the High Court of Jharkhand at Ranchi W.P.(S) No.2971 of 2011 1. Smt. Surji Paharin 2. Sumia Soren 3. Pansuri Hembrum................................... VERSUS State of Jharkhand and others...................Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.R.PRASADPetitionersFor the Petitioners : Mr.Shresth Gautam For the State : G.P.I 6/ 10.10.11. Since similarly situated other matter has been disposed of videorder dated 16th September, 2011, this writ application was heard and is being disposed of. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that all the three petitioners working as Angan Bari Sevika in different Angan Bari Centers, namely, Anlagachi, Bhagwanpur and Vetatola were allegedly found absent when the then Deputy Commissioner made inspection of the aforesaid Angan Bari Centers and hence, their services were terminated vide order as contained in memo no.45 dated 17.2.2011 issued by the Child Development Programme Officer, Maheshpur. The said order has been sought tobe ...
Ramswaroop Mandal and ors Vs. State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Oct-10-2011
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A No. 6794 of 2011 ------1. Ramswaroop Mandal 2. Sushil Mandal 3. Anil Mandal .. Petitioners -VersusThe State of Jharkhand CORAM : ...... Opposite Party -----HONBLE MR. JUSTICE H.C.MISHRA -----For the Petitioners : Mr.K.P.Deo, Advocate For the State : Mr.S Sinha, A.P.P. For the Informant : Ms.Shweta Singh, Advocate -----2/ 10.10.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, the learned counsel for the State as also the learned counsel for the informant. The petitioners have been made accused in Godda (M) P.S case no.305 of 2011 corresponding to G.R No.944 of 2011 for the offence under Sections 341, 323, 325, 307, 436, 34 of the Indian Penal Code. From the F.I.R it appears that there is land dispute between the parties, in which, occurrence had taken place and the informant was assaulted by these petitioners. It further appears that there is case and counter case between the parties. In the facts of this case, I am inclined to release the pet...
Laltu Kumbhkar Vs. State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Oct-10-2011
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 6818 of 2011 Laltu Khubhkar @ Hareram Khumbhakar @ Laltu Khuumkar @ Hareram Khumbkar ..... Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand . Opposite Party CORAM: HONBLE MR. JUSTICE H.C. MISHRA :Mr. D. K. Karmakar :A. P.P.For the Petitioner For the State----2/10.10.2011 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the Prosecution. Petitioner has been made accused for the offence under Sections 25 (1-A)26/35 of the Arms Act and Sections 115/120B of the Indian Penal Code, in connection with Mango (M.G.M.) P.S. Case No. 21 of 2011, corresponding to G.R. Case No. 113 of 2011. It is alleged that some persons had assembled with the intention to commit offence and the petitioner was apprehended on 14.01.2011 alongwith the other co-accused persons and from the possession of this petitioner one loaded country made pistol and one live cartridge were recovered. In the facts and circumstances of the case, I am inclined to release the pe...
Etwari Yadav @ Tiwari Vs. State of Jharkhand
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Oct-10-2011
INHIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B. A. No. 5143 of 2011 Etwari Yadav @ Tiwari ..... Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand .. Opposite Party -------CORAM : HONBLE MR. JUSTICE H. C. MISHRA -----For the Petitioner : Mr. Naresh Prasad Thakur, Advocate For the State : Mr. A.B.Mahato, A.P.P.------THE4/ 10.10.2011Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for The petitioner has been made accused for the offence underthe Prosecution. Sections 395 and 397 of the Indian Penal Code, in connection with Rail Gomoh G.R.P.S. Case No. 3 of 2011. The case relates to dacoity in a train, which was instituted against unknown. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case and there is recovery of two daggers from the petitioner, which is alleged to be used in the crime and there is no other recovery from him. It has also been submitted that the petitioner was not put to test identification parade. Learned counsel has acc...
indra Dev Singh Vs. Mineral Area Development Autho
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Oct-10-2011
INTHEHIGHCOURTOFJHARKHANDATRANCHI W.P .(S)No.5351of2011 IndraDevSingh ... ... ... ... ... ... Petitioner Versus 1. Mineral Area Development Authority through its Managing Director officiating at Lubi Circular Road,Hirapur,Dhanbad 2. The Sub Divisional Officer, Mineral Area DevelopmentAuthority,Kusunda 3. The Executive Engineer, Mineral Area DevelopmentAuthority,Kusunda ... ... ... Respondents CORAM: HON'BLEMR.JUSTICED.N.PATEL ForthePetitioner: Mr.JitendraTripathi FortheRespondents: Mr.BhaweshKumar 02/Dated:10October,2011 th 1) Counsel for the petitioner submitted that suffice it will be fordisposalofthiswritpetition,ifadirectionisgiventorespondentNo.1to treat this writ petition as a representation and decide the grievances ventilatedinthiswritpetitionwithregardtopaymentofretiralbenefits andarrearsofsalaryinaccordancewithlaw,withinstipulatedtime,as givenbythisCourt. 2) Ihaveheardcounselfortherespondents,whohassubmittedthat theyhavenomuchobjection,ifsuchadirectionisgiventorespondent no. ...
Bageshwari Prasad Vs. State of Jharkhand and anr.
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Oct-10-2011
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr. M.P. No. 1484 of 2007 Bageshwari Prasad v. 1. The State of Jharkhand 2. Pradeep Singh CORAM: ... ....Petitioner..Opposite PartiesHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRASHANT KUMAR For the Petitioner: For the State: Mr. A.K. Sahani APP confined this10/10.10.2011:Learned counsel for the petitionerapplication only against the order dated 24.1.2006 and 8.1.2007 respectively by which non bailable warrant of arrest and processes under section 82, 83 of the Cr.P.C. issued against the petitioner. It is submitted by Sri Sahani learned counsel for the petitioner that in the instant case prior to submission of charge sheet, petitioner was on bail. However, after submission of charge sheet by order dated 7.2.2004 cognizance was taken and it was ordered that summon be issued against the petitioner. It is submitted that summon never served upon the petitioner, but, in spite of that the aforesaid two orders passed by which non bailable warrant of arrest and processes unde...
Deepak Patel Vs. State of Jharkhand and anr
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Oct-10-2011
INTHEHIGHCOURTOFJHARKHANDATRANCHIDeepak PatelCr.M.P.No. 1649 of 2007 ----. ... .... ...Petitioner Opp.party. Versus The State of Jharkhand & Anr....,.-----CORAM: HONBLE MR.JUSTICE PRASHANT KUMAR -----For the Petitioner : Mr. A.K.Das, Advocate For the State : A.P.P. & Mr. Mohit Prakash -----04/10.10.2011 Learned counsel for the petitioner seekspermission to withdraw this application. Permission accorded. Accordingly, this application is dismissed as withdrawn.( Prashant Kumar,J.)Raman/...
- ‹ Prev
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 11
- 12
- 13
- 14
- 15
- Next ›
- Last »