indra Dev Singh Vs. Mineral Area Development Autho

c-101, vasundhara apartments, dwarka, new delhi was purchased by the defendant in the name of the plaintiff and for her benefit. regarding property at l-4, connaught place, new delhi, it is alleged that the plaintiff has no right in the aforesaid property which belongs to the defendant. since the defendant is willing to give half of the rental income from the aforesaid house to the plaintiff after deducting the expenditure incurred on its upkeep and maintenance, the plaintiff is entitled to a decree of rendition of accounts with respect to the rental income earned by the defendant from h.no.670, ajit singh nagar mohali phase-ii, punjab. inthehighcourtofjharkhandatranchi w.p .(s)no.5351of2011 indradevsingh ... ... ... ... ... ... petitioner versus 1. mineral area development authority through its managing director officiating at lubi circular road,hirapur,dhanbad 2. the sub divisional officer, mineral area developmentauthority,kusunda 3. the executive engineer, mineral area developmentauthority,kusunda ... ... ... respondents coram: hon'blemr.justiced.n.patel forthepetitioner: mr.jitendratripathi fortherespondents: mr.bhaweshkumar 02/dated:10october,2011 th 1) counsel for the petitioner submitted that suffice it will be fordisposalofthiswritpetition,ifadirectionisgiventorespondentno.1to treat this writ petition as a representation and decide the grievances ventilatedinthiswritpetitionwithregardtopaymentofretiralbenefits andarrearsofsalaryinaccordancewithlaw,withinstipulatedtime,as givenbythiscourt. 2) ihaveheardcounselfortherespondents,whohassubmittedthat theyhavenomuchobjection,ifsuchadirectionisgiventorespondent no. 1 to treat this writ petition as a representation and decide the grievancesventilatedinthiswritpetitioninaccordancewithlaw,within thestipulatedtime,asgivenbythiscourt. 3) inviewofthesesubmissions,ihereby,directrespondentno.1to treat this writ petition as a representation and decide the grievances ventilatedinthispetitionwithregardtopaymentofretiralbenefitsand arrearsofsalary,inaccordancewithlaw,rules,regulations,policiesand government enforceable orders, applicable to the petitioner as expeditiouslyaspossibleandpracticable,preferablywithinaperiodof twelveweeks,fromthedateofreceiptofacopyofanorderofthiscourt, aftergivinganadequateopportunityofbeingheardtothepetitionerorto2 his representatives. if the amount is found legally payable to the petitioner,thesamewillbepaidwithinafurtherperiodoffourweeks thereafter. 4) inviewoftheabovedirections,thiswritpetitionisdisposedof.manoj/cp.2(d.n.patel,j)