Himachal Pradesh Court November 1985 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Himachal Road Transport Corporation Vs. Rajinder Lal and ors.
Court: Himachal Pradesh
Decided on: Nov-21-1985
Reported in: 2(1986)ACC104
V.P. Gupta, J.1. By this judgment, we are disposing of three Leters Patent Appeals Nos. 3 of 1982, 4 of 1982 and 5 of 1982. All these appeals arise out of a single judgment and one accident of Bus No. HPC-I83 on 18-7-1974.2. Briefly the facts are that Bus No. HPC-183 was being driven from Chamba to Pathankot with 19 passengers, by the Driver Shri Puran Chand (now deceased). It met with an accident at about 4-15 P.M. on 18-7-1974 at a place about one and half kms from. 'Daredda' when it rolled down into a khud. Several passengers who were travelling in the bus were injured or killed. Shri Puran Chand driver, was also killed. One Ved Parkash (passenger) also died on the spot as a result of the injuries received by him in the accident. Rajinder Lal and Mohiader Lal, were also passengers is the bus aad they also received various iajuries and were hospitalized.3. Smt. Kusum widow and Sunit Kumar minor son of Ved Parkash (deceased) alongwith Smt. Surmi Devi, mother of Ved Parkash filed an ap...
Smt. Shakuntala Kochhar Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.
Court: Himachal Pradesh
Decided on: Nov-07-1985
Reported in: AIR1986HP90
V.P. Gupta, J.1. The present writ petition was dismissed vide judgment dt. 14-4-1975 delivered by a Division Bench of this Court. The petitioner filed a civil review petition No. 9 of 1975 which was disposed of on 20-12-1976 by the same Division Bench. The review order dt. 20-12-1976 reads as follows: --'By this review application, the applicant, Smt. Shakuntala Kochhar. prays for review of our order dt. April 14, 1975 dismissing Civil Writ Petition No. 114 of 1972.It is claimed by the applicant that relief was sought in the writ petition against the recovery of Rs. 8,900/- and of damages for use and occupation of the property in dispute, and that when judgment was delivered disposing of the writ petition the consideration of that relief was omitted. It is prayed that the order dismissing the aforesaid writ petition be set aside in so far as the prayer for that relief has not been considered.We have heard learned counsel for the parties, and have also consulted the notes recorded by us...
- ‹ Prev
- Next ›