Gujarat Court June 2011 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Balwantbhai Bhagwatbhai Tiwari Vs. Thro. Public Prosecutor
Court: Gujarat
Decided on: Jun-08-2011
1. Rule. Learned APP, Mr.J.K.Shah, waives service of notice of rule on behalf of State. 2. This is an application under Section 439 of Criminal Procedure Code praying for regular bail in connection with offence registered with Vapi Town Police Station, District - Valsad, vide C.R.No.I-80 of 2011 for the offences punishable under Sections 143, 147, 148, 149, 307, 323 and 504 of IPC. 3. Following aspects are taken into consideration: i) The date of the incident is 3rd April,2011; ii) The injured was discharged from the hospital on 7.4.2011 and is out of danger; iii) The overtact of inflicting injury on the body of the injured is not attributed to the present applicant; iv) Investigation is practically over. 4. Under the circumstances, I am persuaded to exercise my discretion in favour of the accused-applicants. Under the circumstances, accused-applicants are ordered to be enlarged on regular bail in connection with offence registered with Vapi Town Police Station, vide C.R.No....
Ashokbhai Najabhai Sagathia Vs. State of Gujarat
Court: Gujarat
Decided on: Jun-08-2011
1. Rule. Learned APP, Mr.J.K.Shah, waives service of notice of rule on behalf of State. 2. This is an application under Section 439 of Criminal Procedure Code praying for regular bail in connection with offence registered with Amreli Taluka Police Station vide C.R. No. I- 96 of 2009 for the offences punishable under Sections 363, 366 and 376 of the Indian Penal Code. 3. Heard learned advocate Mr.Ashish M. Dagli for accused-applicant and learned APP Mr.J.K.Shah for respondent State. 4. The case of the prosecution is that the applicant abducted the prosecutrix from the lawful guardianship of the first informant, who is father of the prosecutrix, in the year 2009 and thereafter got married. It is the case of the prosecution that at the time of commission of offence, in the year 2009, the daughter of the first informant, named, Manisha was 15 years and 10 months of age. However, the fact remains that the accused applicant got married with Manisha and out of wedlock, they have a son who is,...
Arun @ Lalu Omkar Tiwari Vs. Thro. Public Prosecutor
Court: Gujarat
Decided on: Jun-07-2011
1. Rule. Learned APP Mr. J.K.Shah, waives service of notice of rule on behalf of State. 2. This is an application under Section 439 of Criminal Procedure Code praying for regular bail in connection with offence registered with Mahidharpura Police Station vide CR No.I-167 of 2009 for the offences punishable under Sections 406, 420 and 120 of Indian Penal Code. 3. Prima facie it appears that at the time when the accused applicant was arrested by police in connection with another offence being CR No.I-71 of 2011 registered with Salabatpura for the offences punishable under Section 420 and 114 by way of transfer warrant the accused applicant was arrested in connection with the present Crime Register. He has already been ordered to released in connection with CR No.I-71 of 2011 registered with Salabatpura Police Station. It is brought to my notice by APP Mr.Shah that during the course of investigation of the present offence nothing incriminating has been recovered or found from the possessi...
Mukeshbhai Chotubhai Koli Patel Vs. Thro. Public Prosecutor
Court: Gujarat
Decided on: Jun-07-2011
1. This is an application under Section 439 of Cr.P.C., praying for regular bail in connection with the offence registered with Chikhli Police Station, Navsari District vide C.R. No.III-315/2011 for the offences punishable under Sections 66(1)B, 65AE, 116(2) and 99 of the Bombay Prohibition Act. 2. Heard Mr.Adil Mirza, learned Counsel for the accused-applicant and Mr.Shah, learned APP for the respondent State. 3. The following aspects are taken into consideration:- (a) All the offences are Magistrate triable offences. (b) The maximum punishment provided under the provisions is up to three years. (c) No apprehension of accused fleeing from justice or tampering with the prosecution witness has been expressed. (d) Investigation is practically over. 4. In view of the above, I am persuaded to exercise my discretion in favour of the applicant. 5. Taking into consideration above prima facie aspects of the matter, the accused-applicant is ordered to be released on regular bail in connection wi...
Ajaykumar Navnitlal Shah Vs. State of Gujarat
Court: Gujarat
Decided on: Jun-07-2011
1. Rule. Learned APP, Mr.J.K.Shah, waives service of notice of rule on behalf of State. 2. This is an application under Section 439 of Criminal Procedure Code praying for regular bail in connection with offence registered with Padara Police Station vide M.Case No.2 of 2010 for the offences punishable under Sections 404, 409, 415, 420, 423, 465, 467, 468, 471 and 114 of the Indian Penal Code. 3. Heard learned advocate Mr.Mehul Sharad Shah for accused-applicant and learned APP Mr.J.K.Shah for respondent State. 4. The accused applicant herein and the first informant are natural brothers. As per the complaint, the accused applicant and first informant were partners in the firm running in the name and style of Shah Navnitlal Punjalal Choksi. The said partnership firm was dissolved and converted into a proprietary concern on 21.3.2000.It is alleged in the complaint that after the death of the father, the accused- applicant had agreed in presence of the family members to pay Rs.7,50,000...
Pratapbhai Hamirbhai Solanki Vs. State of Gujarat
Court: Gujarat
Decided on: Jun-06-2011
1. Rule. Mr.Shah, learned APP waives service of Rule.2. This is an application seeking temporary bail in connection with the offence registered with Sola Police Station, Ahmedabad vide C.R. No.I-163/2010 for the offences punishable under Section 302 read with 114 of IPC and Section 25(1)(b)(a) of the Arms Act.3. Heard Mr.A.Y.Kogje, learned Counsel for the accused-applicant and Mr.Shah, learned APP for the respondent State.4. The temporary bail is prayed for on the ground that the wife of the applicant has an acute gynaec problem and she needs to undergo surgery for Fibroid Uterus at the earliest at Kodinar. It is submitted by the learned Counsel, Mr.Kogje that as on today, the wife of the applicant is admitted at Shri Ramsinhbhai Naranbhai Vala Smarak Trust Sanchalit Hospital, Kodinar. Certificate to this effect has been annexed at page 12 of the application.5. The fact of wife ailing and needs to undergo surgery for Fibroid Uterus is further confirmed by the report of the Police Inspe...
Faridbhai Kodarbhai Makrani Vs. State of Gujarat
Court: Gujarat
Decided on: Jun-06-2011
1. Rule. Learned APP, Mr.J.K.Shah, waives service of notice of rule on behalf of State. 2. This is an application under Section 439 of Criminal Procedure Code praying for regular bail in connection with offence registered with Idar Police Station, vide C.R.No.II-3108 of 2011 for the offences punishable under Sections 3 and 7 of the Essential Commodities Act. 3. Following aspects are taken into consideration: 1. Offences are under Sections 3 and 7 of the Essential Commodities Act. 2. Maximum punishment prescribed for the offence under Section 7 is upto 7 years. 3. The consignment of essential commodities is already in possession of the supply officers including the vehicle in question. 4. No further investigation is necessary. Investigation is practically over. 4. Considering the nature of offence and the role attributed, I am persuaded to exercise my discretion in favour of the accused-applicants. Under the circumstances, accused-applicants are ordered to be enlarged on regular bail&nb...
Ramtuben Vs. State of Gujarat
Court: Gujarat
Decided on: Jun-06-2011
1. Rule. Learned APP, Mr.J.K.Shah, waives service of notice of rule on behalf of State. 2. This is an application under Section 439 of Criminal Procedure Code praying for regular bail in connection with offence registered with Sukhsar Police Station vide C.R.No.I-14 of 2011 for the offences punishable under Sections 302 and 114 of the Indian Penal Code. 3. The case of the prosecution prima facie appears to be that on the date of the unfortunate incident, the first informant and others were walking through an agricultural field heading towards a particular place. When they were travelling through the agricultural field, the accused applicants two ladies came over there and picked up a quarrel. The quarrel was on the premise as to why the first informant and other witnesses were travelling through the field which according to the applicants accused belongs to them. It appears that at that point of time, some quarrel ensued as a result of which, both the accused applicants picked up stone...
Laljibhai Gandabhai Senva Vs. State of Gujarat
Court: Gujarat
Decided on: Jun-06-2011
1. Learned APP, Mr.J.K.Shah, waives service of notice of rule on behalf of State. 2. This is an application under Section 439 of Criminal Procedure Code praying for regular bail in connection with offence registered with Sojitra Police Station vide C.R.No.I-75 of 2010 for the offences punishable under Sections 465, 467, 468, 471 and 120-B of the Indian Penal Code. 3. Heard learned advocate Mr.Barot for accused applicant and learned APP Mr.J.K.Shah for respondent State. 4. Following aspects are taken into consideration for ordering the release of the accused applicant on regular bail : i. All offences are magistrate triable offences; ii. Investigation is over. Charge-sheet is filed. iii. Entire case is based on documentary evidence. iv. No apprehension of accused fleeing from justice or tempering with the witness has been expressed. v. The accused-applicant herein is a retired Talati-cum-Mantri. vi. The offence relates to mutation of entries effected in the year 1999. This fact ca...
Mukeshbhai Popatbhai Patel Vs. State of Gujarat
Court: Gujarat
Decided on: Jun-06-2011
1. This is an Application under Section 389 of the Code of Criminal Procedure preferred by the accused-applicant, praying for suspension of the substantive order of sentence imposed by the Additional District and Sessions Judge, Sabarkantha at Himmatnagar (camp at Idar), dated 21st May 2011 passed in Sessions Case No.159/2007, whereby the Additional District and Sessions Judge convicted the accused-applicant for the offences punishable under Sections 397, 395, 342, 506(2) read with Section 120B of the Indian Penal Code. 2. The trial Court, while convicting the accused-applicant for the offences punishable - (a) under Section 395 IPC, has ordered the accused-applicant to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a term of 7 years with fine of Rs.5,000=00 and in default of payment of fine, further simple imprisonment of one year. (b) under Section 397 IPC, has ordered the accused applicant to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a term of 7 years. (c) under Section 342 IPC, has ordered the acc...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 7
- Next ›
- Last »