Gujarat Court June 2011 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Bharkesh Surendrakumar Patel Vs. State of Gujarat
Court: Gujarat
Decided on: Jun-06-2011
1. Rule. Mr.Shah, learned APP waives service Rule for the respondent State.2. This is an application under Section 439 of Cr.P.C., praying for regular bail in connection with the offence registered with Deesa City Police Station vide C.R. No.I-23/2011 for the offences punishable under Section 328, 384, 385, read with 120B of IPC.3. Heard Mr.Dipak Patel, learned Counsel for the applicant and Mr.Shah, learned APP for the respondent State.4. The sum and substance of the case of the prosecution is that the accused-applicant and other co-accused hatched a conspiracy to black-mail the first informant and thereby extort money from him by showing some of his photographs in company of a girl. It is the case of the prosecution that a stupefying drug was administered to the first informant and thereafter photographs were clicked.5. Taking into consideration the facts and circumstances of the case, prima facie the say of the first informant does not inspire any confidence and the FIR is belated by...
Dahyaji Kaluji Thakor Vs. State of Gujarat
Court: Gujarat
Decided on: Jun-03-2011
1. Rule. Learned APP Mr. J.K. Shah waives service of notice of rule on behalf of opponent State. 2. The present application has been moved by the petitioner Maghiben Dahyaji Thakor on behalf of her husband Dahyaji Kaluji Thakor seeking temporary bail for her husband on the ground that the engagement of their son viz. Jigar has been fixed on 06.06.2011. 3. The applicant appearing party in person has submitted that she is also the co-accused along with her husband and she has been released on temporary bail which expires on 14.06.2011. 4. Learned APP Mr. Shah has produced on record the report of Jail Authority, Ahmedabad, from which, it appears that the present applicant and her husband Dahyaji Thakor have been convicted for the offence under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code and other offences under the Indian Penal Code and are undergoing life imprisonment at Central Jail, Ahmedabad. 5. Considering the submissions of the applicant that the engagement ceremony of her son viz. Jigar i...
Mukeshkumar Pranlal Vakharia Vs. Arunaben Mukeshbhai Vakharia
Court: Gujarat
Decided on: Jun-03-2011
1. Mr. Tushar L Sheth, learned Advocate for the respondent No.1 waives service of notice of rule for the respondent No.1. 2. The present revision application has been moved by the applicant under Section 397 read with Section 401 of Criminal Procedure Code challenging the judgment and order dated 18th April 2011 passed in Criminal Misc. Application No.52 of 2011 by the Family Court, Rajkot. It has been submitted by learned Advocate Mr. Mrudul Barot for Mr.M.K.Vakharia for the applicant that the applicant was directed to pay the maintenance within a period of six months from the date of the order passed in Criminal Misc. Application No.65 of 2008 by the Principal Judge, Family Court, Rajkot. However, thereafter, the same judge passed the order dated 18th April, 2011 imposing simple imprisonment for a period of 770 days on the ground of non-payment of amount of maintenance. According to Mr.Barot, if the applicant is released on bail pending the revision application, he will be able to m...
JaIn Rachnakumari Vimalchandra Vs. State of Gujarat
Court: Gujarat
Decided on: Jun-02-2011
1. As common question of facts and law are involved in both these petitions, they are disposed of by this common judgment. RULE returnable forthwith. Ms.Monali Bhatt, learned AGP for the State waives service of rule. 2. The grievance redressed by the petitioners is with regard to the decision of the respondents in not accepting their application forms online for appearing in the Teacher Eligibility Test (TET, for short), which is scheduled to be conducted on 12th June 2011. All petitioners cleared their graduation with the subject of Social Science. All these petitioners are aspiring to be appointed as Primary Teachers based on their qualifications. The appointment on the post of Primary Teachers is regulated in accordance with the provisions of the Right of Children to Free and Compulsory Education Act, 2009 and the guidelines in the form of notifications issued by the National Council for Teachers' Education in that regard from time to time. The NCTE has laid down the minimum qu...
Mohanbhai Yashvantbhai Khandekar Vs. State of Gujarat
Court: Gujarat
Decided on: Jun-01-2011
1. Challenge in this petition is to the Notification issued by the Commissioner of Police, Surat City in purported exercise of powers under Section 144 of the Criminal Procedure Code, restraining the petitioners, who are engaged in the business of manufacturing of Idols of Ganesh and other Gods and Goddesses by using Clay and Plaster of Paris. It appears from the Objects of Notification that these Idols made of Clay and Plaster of Paris are immersed in rivers and other water bodies thereby causing water pollution. To meet with this emergent situation, the Commissioner of Police, Surat City has thought fit to issue certain directions in this regard, in exercise of powers under Section 144 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. 2. I am of the view that following two questions, need to be considered: 1. Whether the Commissioner of Police, Surat City exceeded his jurisdiction under Section 144 of the Code of Criminal Procedure in passing the impugned Notification, banning use of Clay and Plast...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- Next ›