Gujarat Court September 2007 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Torrent Power Ltd. Vs. Mansukh D. Patel
Court: Gujarat
Decided on: Sep-10-2007
Reported in: AIR2008Guj1
ORDERD.N. Patel, J.1. Admit. The present Appeal from Order has been preferred by the original defendant against the order dated 9th January, 2007 below Notice of Motion preferred by the respondent (original plaintiff) in Civil Suit No. 2360 of 2006 passed by the City Civil Court, Ahmedabad, whereby the trial Court has directed present appellant company to supply additional load of electricity to the respondent (original plaintiff) despite the fact that the plaintiff has not paid the amount towards consumption of electricity for service bearing consumer No. 747609. The original plaintiff is having electricity connection in his own name, one is having consumer service No. 747609, (for this service, because of theft of electricity, supplementary bill has been issued by the appellant company to the tune of Rs. 1,05,166.00ch has not been yet paid by the original plaintiff) and another consumer service No. 1324664 for which additional load of electricity is demanded and as the same was not g...
Kamlesh Ishwarbhai Patel Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.
Court: Gujarat
Decided on: Sep-07-2007
Reported in: (2008)1GLR409
Akshay H. Mehta, J.1. In this petition, the petitioner has sought to challenge order passed by the Appellate Tribunal for Foreign Exchange at New Delhi dated 2-2-2007 below the application given in Appeal No. 121 of 1999. By the said order, the application filed by the petitioner for dispensation of making pre-deposit has been rejected and appeal has been ordered to be listed on 22-5-2007 for hearing. It is stated at the Bar that the appeal is not yet heard.2. The facts, in short, giving rise to the present petition can be stated as under:2.1. The deceased father of the petitioner viz., Shri Ishwardas Bechardas Patel was in the Angadia business as a partner of M/s. Patel Ishwardas Bechardas, a firm having four partners including him. The other three partners were his brothers. On 5-1-1994 a team of Preventive Officers under the provisions of Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1973 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act') visited the Mumbai branch of the partnership firm and seized various ...
State of Gujarat Vs. Salim @ PravIn GulamhussaIn Shaikh
Court: Gujarat
Decided on: Sep-06-2007
Reported in: (2008)1GLR706
A.M. Kapadia, J.1. Instant Criminal Confirmation Case, pursuant to submission of the proceedings made under Section 366(1) of the Code of Criminal Procedure ('the Code' for short), along with companion appeal filed under Section 374(2) of the Code by the appellant ('the accused' for short), arise out of the judgment and order dated 31-12-2005 rendered in Sessions Case No. 34 of 2004 by the learned Presiding Officer, Fast Track Court No. 9, Bharuch, by which the accused is convicted for commission of the offence of murder of his five daughters, who were of tender age, by throwing them into the waters of the Narmada River from the Sardar Bridge, under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code ('I.P.C.' for short) and sentenced to death with a direction that the accused should be hanged by the neck till his death, subject to confirmation by this Court.2. As the Criminal Confirmation Case and the companion appeal arise out of same judgment and order, this Court proposes to hear the reference fo...
National Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Baby Anjali and ors.
Court: Gujarat
Decided on: Sep-03-2007
Reported in: 2008ACJ1506; AIR2008Guj12; (2007)3GLR2731
ORDERR.S. Garg, J.1. Shri Rajni H. Mehta, learned Counsel for the appellant, none for the respondent Nos. 1 to 3 though name of Shri R.N. Shah is shown in the daily cause list, none for the respondent No. 4 though served. The appellant-Insurance Company, being aggrieved by the award dated 18th May, 1990 passed by the learned Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (Aux), Panchmahals at Godhra in MAC. Petition No. 964/87, is before this Court with a submission that the Tribunal erred in holding the Insurance Company liable to the extent of full amount as awarded by the Tribunal, less appreciating that the liability of the Insurance Company could be restricted to the extent of Rs. 1,50,000/-, interest thereon and the consequential costs.2. Shri Rajni H. Mehta, learned Counsel for the appellant submitted that though tractor as defined under Section 2(30) and the trailer as defined under Section 2(32) of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1939 are separate motor vehicles, but if a trailer is attached to the t...
Devabhai Parbatbhai Avadia and ors. Vs. P.D. Waghela, Competent Author ...
Court: Gujarat
Decided on: Sep-03-2007
Reported in: AIR2008Guj20; (2008)1GLR158
ORDERAkshay H. Mehta, J.1. This Court issued Rule on the petition on 24-8-2007. Mr. Sunit Shah, Ld. GP waived service of rule for respondents Nos. 1 and 2 and Mr. A.R. Thakkar, learned advocate waived service of rule for respondents Nos. 3 to 6. At the request of the learned advocates for the parties and looking to the urgency, the petition was taken up for final hearing on 24-8-2007 itself. The hearing got concluded on 29-8-2007, Thereafter, the petition has been adjourned to 3-9-2007 for pronouncement of the judgment. Now it is being disposed of by this CAV judgment.2. The petitioners herein seek to challenge the proceedings initiated against them under the provisions of The Gujarat Provision for Disqualification of Members of Local Authorities for Defendant Act, 1986 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act') and The Gujarat Provision for Disqualification of Members of Local Authorities for Defection Rules, 1987 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Rules') as also The Gujarat Provision for ...
- ‹ Prev
- 1
- 2
- Next ›