Delhi Court May 2026 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Rohit Bindal vs State of Nct of Delhi and Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-04-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CRL.M.C. 2619/2026, CRL.M.A. 10659-10660/2026 ROHIT BINDAL .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Aamir Chaudhary, Advocate alongwith petitioner in personversusSTATE OF NCT OF DELHI AND ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Satish Kumar, APP with Ms. Upasna Bakshi, Mr. Dinesh Kumar and Ms. Divya Bakshi, Advocates Mr. Rajiv Singh Pilania, Advocate for R-2 alongwith R-2 in personCORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAURABH BANERJEEORDER% 04.05.20261. By virtue of the present petition under Section 482 of the Code ofCriminal Procedure, 1973 read with Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, the petitioner seeks quashing of FIR No.212/2012 dated 21.09.2012 registered at PS: Kotwali under Section 420/34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) and all proceedings emanating therefrom in view of the fact that the offence under Section 420 IPC had already been compounded by the learned Trial Court vide order dated 02.05.2017 [Annexure A5].2. Issu...
Govt of Nct of Delhi & Ors vs Dr. H.C Gupta
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-04-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI% Judgment reserved on: 18.03.2026Judgment pronounced on: 04.05.2026Judgment uploaded on: 04.05.2026+ W.P.(C) 4705/2018 & CM APPL. 20533/2023, CM APPL. GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS .....Petitioners Through: Ms. Avnish Ahlawat, SC along with Mr. Nitesh Kumar Singh, Ms. Aliza Alam and Mr. Mohnish Sehrawat, Advs.versusDR. H.C GUPTA .....Respondent Through: Mr. Kirtiman Singh, Sr. Adv. along with Mr. Ritwik Saha, Mr. Shaurya Shyam and Mr. Maulik Khurana, Advs.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KSHETARPALHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT MAHAJANJUDGMENTANIL KSHETARPAL, J. :1. Through the present Writ Petition, the Government of NCT ofDelhi [hereinafter referred to as GNCTD] has invoked jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking to quash orders dated 16.02.2016 and 19.03.2018 [hereinafter referred to as Impugned Orders] passed by the learned Central Administrative Tribunal, Principal Bench, New Delhi [hereinafter refe...
Ht Media Pvt. Ltd. vs Gnct of Delhi and Anr.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: May-04-2026
* IN THEHIGH COURTOF DELHIAT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 5977/2018 HT MEDIA PVT. LTD. .....Petitioner Through:Ms. Raavi Birbal, Advocate with Mr.Arun Pathak, AGM legalversusGNCT OF DELHI AND ANR. .....Respondents Through:Mr.Anubhav Gupta, Panel Counsel with Ms.Rashi Aggarwal, Advocate for respondent No.1 Mr.Sudhir Kumar Sharma and Mr.Utkarsh Kumar, Advocates for respondent No.2CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR OHRIORDER% 04.05.2026 CM APPL. 29397/2026 (joint application for disposal of the petition in terms of settlement between the parties before Mediation)1. By way of present joint application filed on behalf of the parties, theCourt is informed that the parties have arrived at an amicable settlement vide Mediation Settlement dated 09.04.2026, before Delhi Mediation Centre, Rouse Avenue District Courts, New Delhi.2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that, in compliance of theaforesaid Settlement Agreement, a cheque bearing No.801705 dated 14.04.2026 for a sum of Rs.5,00,000...
Arman Ali vs State
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: May-04-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CRL.A. 1038/2008 ARMAN ALI .....Appellant Through: None.versusSTATE .....Respondent Through: Mr. Satinder Singh Bawa, APP for the State with SI Dipika, PS Adarsh Nagar.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIMAL KUMAR YADAVORDER% 04.05.20261. Hybrid Mode.2. None for the Appellant.3. Learned APP for the State pointed out that the Appellant is not traceable at the given address, as the Jhuggis where he was residing have been removed.4. In addition to that it has been pointed out by learned APP that the Appellant has already served the sentence and has been released thereafter, as can be seen from the communication dated 13.08.2013 from the Prison Authority.5. In these circumstances, when nobody is coming forward and there is no possibility of anybody coming forward to contest the appeal, which is otherwise infructuous and accordingly disposed-of as dismissed. VIMAL KUMAR YADAV, J MAY 4, 2026/hkThis is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of th...
Mamram Educational Society & Anr vs Delhi Development Authority
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-04-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 4359/2015 MAMRAM EDUCATIONAL SOCIETY & ANR .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Harish Malhotra Sr. Adv. with Mr. Rajender Agarwal and Mr. Anoop Kumar Advs.versusDELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY .....Respondent Through: Mr. Arun Birbal and Mr. Sanjay Singh, Advs.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASMEET SINGHORDER% 04.05.20261. This is a writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution ofIndia seeking the following prayers:- (i) to issue a Writ of Certiorati or any other appropriate writ, order or direction in favour of the petitioners and against the respondent / DDA thereby setting aside the letter dated 31.,3.2015 whereby the respondent refused to pay interest on the refund amount of Rs. 6,33,22,500/-.(ii) to issue a Writ of Mandamus or any other appropriatewrit, order or direction in favour of the petitioners and against the respondent / DDA thereby directing the respondent / DDA to pay the interest @ 18% p.a., or at any othe...
Pankaj Mishra & Ors. vs State (Govt. of Nct of Delhi) & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-02-2026
$~5* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision: 02.05.2026+ CRL.M.C. 1143/2026PANKAJ MISHRA & ORS. .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Abhinav Kathuria, proxy counsel appointed by the Bar for petitioners with petitioners in personversusSTATE (GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI) & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Hemant Mehla, APP for State with SI Monu Kumari Complainant de facto in personJ U D G M E N T (ORAL)1. Lawyers are stated to be on strike. But strike by lawyers is no groundto adjourn a matter. Therefore, I have examined the records. Petitioners seek quashing of case FIR No. 894/2022 of PS Dabri for offence under Section 498A/406/34 IPC on the ground that the complainant de facto (respondent no. 2 herein) has compromised all matrimonial disputes with the petitioners.2. State has no objection to this petition. Statements of parties havealready been recorded by the concerned Joint Registrar.CRL.M.C. 1143/2026 Page 1 of 2 pagesGIRISH2.5.4.20=8401dd889b27a77b2f...
Deepak Kumar & Ors. vs Border Security Force & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-02-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI% Judgment reserved on: 30.04.2026Judgment pronounced on: 02.05.2026+ W.P.(C) 17736/2025 & CM APPL. 73299/2025 DEEPAK KUMAR & ORS. .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Joby P Varghese, Ms. Rashi and Mr. Aby P Varghese, Advs.versusBORDER SECURITY FORCE & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Vikram Singh Dalal, Senior Panel Counsel alongwith Mr. Pankaj Kumar, and Mr. Satwik Mitra, Advs. + W.P.(C) 3642/2026 & CM APPL. 17769/2026 DEEPAK KUMAR & ORS. .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Joby P Varghese, Ms. Rashi and Mr. Aby P Varghese, Advs.versusBORDER SECURITY FORCE & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Syed Abdul Haseeb, CGSC with Ms. Nasreen Khatoon, G.P for UOI with Mr. Muhammad Aamir Khan and Mr. Syed Abdur Rahman, Advs.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KSHETARPALHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT MAHAJANJUDGMENTAMIT MAHAJAN, J.18:54:50 W.P.(C) 17736/2025 & W.P.(C) 3642/2026 Page 1 of 121. By the present writ petitions, the ...
Laxmi & Anr. vs Union of India
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-02-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI% Reserved on : 27.04.2026Pronounced on : 02.05.2026Uploaded on : 02.05.2026+ FAO 126/2026 LAXMI & ANR. .....Appellants Through: Mr. Rajan Sood, Ms. Ashima Sood, Ms. Megha Sood, AdvocatesversusUNION OF INDIA .....Respondent Through: Ms. Leela Vati Suman, SPC for UOI with Mr. Amit Rana, GPCORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR OHRIJUDGMENTCM APPL. 28079/2026 (exemption)1. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.2. The application is disposed of accordingly.CM APPL. 28080/2026 (Seeking condonation of delay of 10 days in re- filing the appeal)1. By way of the present application, the applicants/appellants seekcondonation of delay of 10 days in re-filing the appeal.2. For the reasons stated in the application, it is allowed and the delay of10 days in re-filing the appeal is condoned.3. The application is disposed of accordingly.FAO 126/20261. The present appeal has been filed under Section 23 of the RailwayClaims ...
Puran Chand (Deceased) Through Lrs and Ors vs Prabhat (Deceased) Throu ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-02-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI% Reserved on: 10th February, 2026 Pronounced on: 2nd May, 2026 + RSA 101/2023, CM APPL. 26508/2023 & CM APPL. 26568/20231. SH. PURAN CHAND (DECEASED) S/o Sh. Balu Ram Through Legal Heirs(i) Sh. Kundan Lal (Son) S/o. Sh. Late Puran Chand(ii) Sh. Devi Dayal (Son) S/o. Sh. Late Puran Chand(iii) Smt. Mamta Devi (Daughter) W/o. Sh. Nathu Ram(iv) Smt. Shanti Devi (Daughter) W/o. Sh. Rajesh Kumar(V) Smt. Soni Devi (Wife) W/o. Late Sh. Puran Chand2. SH. KUNDAN LAL S/o Late Puran Chand3. SH. DEVI DAYAL S/o. Sh. Late Puran Chand All R/o. C-57, Ground Floor, Shiv Gali Nanak Basti, Kotla Mubarakpur, New Delhi- 110003 .....Appellants Through: NoneversusSH. PRABHAT (DECEASED) Through Legal Heirs All r/o. C-57, Ground Floor, Shiv Gali Nanak Basti, Kotla Mubarakpur, New Delhi- 110003. RSA 101/2023 Page 1 of 191. Chet Ram (Son)2. Sh. Ghanshyam (Son)3. Ishwar Singh (Son)4. Ms. Puni (Daughter) W/o. Late Sh. Leela Ram, R/o. 432/5, Khichripur, De1hi- ...
Rajnish Kumar Ex Constable Gd vs Union of India Through Ministry of Ho ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-02-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI% Judgment reserved on: 30.04.2026Judgment pronounced on: 02.05.2026+ W.P.(C) 11617/2023 RAJNISH KUMAR EX CONSTABLE GD .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Gaurav Kumar and Mr. Naman Sherstra, Advs.versusUNION OF INDIA THROUGH MINISTRY OF HOME AFFAIRS AND ORS .....Respondents Through: Ms. Ritu Reniwal, SPC.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KSHETARPALHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT MAHAJANJUDGMENTAMIT MAHAJAN, J.1. By the present petition, the Petitioner essentially challenges thecorrectness of the order dated 04.08.2021 (hereafter impugned order) passed by Respondent No. 5 whereby the Petitioner was found guilty of the charges under Sections 20(b), 20(c), 22(a), 40 of the BSF Act, 1968 and was sentenced to be dismissed from service.2. Succinctly put, the relevant facts necessary for the adjudication of the present petition are as follows:2.1. The Petitioner was working as Constable (GD) in the Border Security Force. It is alleged that on 26.07.2021...
- ‹ Prev
- 453
- 454
- 455
- 456
- 457
- 458
- 459
- 460
- 461
- 463
- Next ›
- Last »