Arman Ali vs State

Arman Ali vs STATE

Type Court Judgment Court Delhi Orders Decided May 04, 2026

~1 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1275943

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1275943
Court: Delhi Orders High Court
Judge: Hon'Ble Mr. Justice Vimal Kumar Yadav
Decided On: May 04, 2026
Case Number: CRL.A./1038/2008
Subject: Land Acquisition

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Land Acquisition

Key legal issue: Land Acquisition

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Arman Ali

Respondent

STATE

Advocate Mr. Satinder Singh Bawa

Excerpt

* in the high court of delhi at new delhi+ crl.a. 1038/2008 arman ali .....appellant through: none.versusstate .....respondent through: mr. satinder singh bawa, app for the state with si dipika, ps adarsh nagar.coram:hon'ble mr. justice vimal kumar yadavorder% 04.05.20261. hybrid mode.2. none for the appellant.3. learned app for the state pointed out that the appellant is not traceable at the given address, as the jhuggis where he was residing have been removed.4. in addition to that it has been pointed out by learned app that the appellant has already served the sentence and has been released thereafter, as can be seen from the communication dated 13.08.2013 from the prison authority.5. in these circumstances, when nobody is coming forward and there is no possibility of anybody coming forward to contest the appeal, which is otherwise infructuous and accordingly disposed-of as dismissed. vimal kumar yadav, j may 4, 2026/hkthis is a digitally signed order. the authenticity of the order can be re-verified from delhi high court order portal by scanning the qr code shown above. the order is downloaded from the dhc server on 07/05/2026 at 11:59:18

Full Judgment

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
+ CRL.A. 1038/2008 ARMAN ALI .....Appellant Through: None.
versus
STATE .....Respondent Through: Mr. Satinder Singh Bawa, APP for the State with SI Dipika, PS Adarsh Nagar.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIMAL KUMAR YADAV

ORDER

% 04.05.2026

1. Hybrid Mode.

2. None for the Appellant.

3. Learned APP for the State pointed out that the Appellant is not traceable at the given address, as the Jhuggis where he was residing have been removed.

4. In addition to that it has been pointed out by learned APP that the Appellant has already served the sentence and has been released thereafter, as can be seen from the communication dated 13.08.2013 from the Prison Authority.

5. In these circumstances, when nobody is coming forward and there is no possibility of anybody coming forward to contest the appeal, which is otherwise infructuous and accordingly disposed-of as dismissed. VIMAL KUMAR YADAV, J MAY 4, 2026/hk

This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 07/05/2026 at 11:59:18

Same Court & Year Delhi Orders · 2026 Same Parties Arman Ali vs STATE Same Subject Land Acquisition Same Judge Hon'Ble Mr. Justice Vimal Kumar Yadav