Delhi Court May 2026 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Ajit Singh vs Union of India and Ors.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: May-04-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 11460/2019 AJIT SINGH .....Petitioner Through: None.versusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Satya Ranjan Swain (CGSC) & Mr. Kautilya Birat, Advocate.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KSHETARPALHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT MAHAJANORDER% 04.05.20261. There has been no representation on behalf of the Petitioner for the last 5 dates of hearing.2. Today also the position is no different.3. The writ petition stands dismissed for non-prosecution. ANIL KSHETARPAL, J AMIT MAHAJAN, J MAY 4, 2026 DUThis is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 06/05/2026 at 13:08:58...
Alok Kumar Pandey vs Bar Council of India & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-04-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 746/2022, CM APPL. 2102/2022 & CM APPL. 18229/2022 ALOK KUMAR PANDEY .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Vivek Sood, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Naivaidya Parashar, Ms. Medhavi and Ms. Sanskruti Jain, Advs.versusBAR COUNCIL OF INDIA & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Siddharth Luthra, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Vishwa Aman Kandwal and Mr. Amit Kumar Srivastava, Advs. for R- 3.CORAM:HONBLE MR. JUSTICE PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAVORDER% 04.05.20261. The petitioner, an advocate, was exonerated by the Bar Council of Delhi (BCD) in a professional misconduct complaint filed by RespondentNo.3 vide order dated 25.11.2011. The complainant challenged this orderbefore the Bar Council of India (BCI). During the pendency of the revision proceedings before the BCI, the petitioner discovered that Mr. Ved Prakash Sharma, who was a member of the BCD when it exonerated the petitioner, was also a member of the BCI Committee hearing the revision. The petitioner obje...
Karmyogi Hotels and Buildcon Pvt Ltd vs Mr Prashant Garg and Ors
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: May-04-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CS(COMM) 742/2024, I.A. 37969/2024, I.A. 3679/2025, I.A. KARMYOGI HOTELS AND BUILDCON PVT LTD .....Plaintiff Through: Mr. Manish Sharma, Adv.versusMR PRASHANT GARG AND ORS .....Defendants Through: Mr. Aaditya Singh and Mr. Rahul Tyagi, Advs. for D-1,2,4 and 5.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AVNEESH JHINGANORDER% 04.05.20261. Learned counsel for the parties submits that the matter has been settled in mediation and may be disposed of in terms of the settlement agreement dated 04.08.2025.2. The terms of settlement agreement are reproduced below:3. Defendant no. 3 remains unrepresented despite service. The petition is disposed of as withdrawn with liberty to defendant no. 3 to apply for recalling of order if aggrieved by the order. AVNEESH JHINGAN, J MAY 4, 2026/Pa...
Gurvinder Singh Saini vs School Management of Guru Harkrishan Public S ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-04-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 404/2024 & CM APPL. 1822-1824/2024 GURVINDER SINGH SAINI .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Nikhilesh Kumar, Advocate.versusSCHOOL MANAGEMENT OF GURU HARKRISHAN PUBLIC SCHOOL AND ORS .....Respondents Through: Mr. Abinash K. Mishra, Mr. Gaurav Kr. Pandey, Advocates for R-1 to 3.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV NARULAORDER% 04.05.20261. This petition is directed against the order dated 17 th November, 2023 passed by the Disciplinary Authority, based on an inquiry report arising out of disciplinary proceedings initiated against the Petitioner.2. A perusal of the impugned order reveals that the Disciplinary ActionCommittee [DAC], whose decision was subsequently approved by the School Management Committee [SMC], considered three Articles of Charge and imposed the following penalties: ARTICLE- I 1) Removal from the service, which shall not be a disqualification for future employment in any other recognized Private school as per 1...
M/S Atlas Electric Industries Pvt. Ltd. vs M/S Polotrips India (P) Ltd ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-04-2026
$~1 & 2* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHIDate of decision: 04.05.2026 + ARB.P. 1742/2025 THE ATLAS ELECTRIC INDUSTRIES PVT LTD .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Ankit Jain, Senior Advocate along with Mr. Rahul Tyagi and Mr. Aaditya Singh, Advocates.versusM/S POLOTRIPS INDIA (P) LTD & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Prakhar Mittal, Advocate for R-1. Mr. Inderbir Singh Alag, Senior Advocate along with Mr. Rakesh Kumar Yadav, Advocate for R-2. + O.M.P.(I) (COMM.) 271/2025, I.A. 20332/2025 (U/O 39 Rule 4) & I.A. 25532/2025 (On behalf of the R-2 seeking dismissal of the present matter)M/S ATLAS ELECTRIC INDUSTRIES PVT. LTD. .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Ankit Jain, Senior Advocate along with Mr. Rahul Tyagi and Mr. Aaditya Singh, Advocates.versusM/S POLOTRIPS INDIA (P) LTD. & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Prakhar Mittal, Advocate for R-1. Mr. Inderbir Singh Alag, Senior Advocate along with Mr. Rakesh Kumar Yadav, Advocate for R-2. Signing Date:06.05.2026 Page 1...
Balu Devi & Ors vs Union of India & Ors
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: May-04-2026
$~50 & 51* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 108/2017 RAM PAL .....Petitioner UNION OF INDIA AND ORS .....Respondents Mr. Arun Birbal, Adv. for DDA. 51 AND + W.P.(C) 1139/2017 BALU DEVI & ORS .....Petitioners UNION OF INDIA & ORS .....Respondents Ms. Malvika Kapila Kalra & Ms. Harbani Shinh, Advs. for DDA.CORAM:JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH JUSTICE MADHU JAINORDER% 04.05.20261. This hearing has been done through hybrid mode.2. On the previous date i.e., 26th February, 2026 the Court had disposed of the present petitions and had observed as under: [...]13. In this case, the possession of the lands of thePetitioners has admittedly been taken and compensation has also been paid into the Revenue Deposit Account. Accordingly, in terms of the decision in Indore Development Authority (supra) , the Petitioners would only be entitled for release of the compensation, along with the applicable interest.14. Accordingly, it is directed that the compensation in accordan...
Jai Bhagwan Sharma vs Delhi Development Authority & Ors.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: May-04-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 15689/2023 JAI BHAGWAN SHARMA .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Dhanesh Relan, AdvversusDELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & ORS. ...Respondents Through: Mr. Sanjay Katyal (Standing Counsel for DDA) with Mr. Nitish Kumar Danda (Adv)CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASMEET SINGHORDER% 04.05.2026 CM APPL. 29396/20261. This is an application filed under Section 151 of the CPC, 1908 seeking early hearing of the main petition.2. For the reasons stated in the application, issue notice.3. Mr. Katyal, learned standing counsel accepts notice on behalf of the respondent Nos. 1 and 2/DDA.4. For the reasons stated in the application, the application is allowed and the next date of hearing in the main petition shall be preponed from 14.08.2026 to 04.05.2026 i.e., today itself.5. The present application is disposed of in aforesaid terms. W.P.(C) 15689/20236. In view of the above, the matter is being taken up for hearing.7. This is a writ petition fi...
Lakshami Bai vs Union of India
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-04-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI% Reserved on : 04.05.2026Pronounced on : 08.05.2026Uploaded on : 08.05.2026 + FAO 336/2022 LAKSHAMI BAI .....Appellant Through: Mr. Ritik Singh, AdvocateversusUNION OF INDIA .....Respondent Through: Mr. Manish Kumar, SPC with Mr. Rudra Paliwal, AdvocateCORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR OHRIJUDGMENT1. The present appeal has been filed under Section 23 of the RailwayClaims Tribunal Act, 1987, against the judgment dated 15.07.2022, passed by the Railway Claims Tribunal, Principal Bench, Delhi (hereinafter referred to as the Tribunal) in Claim Application No. OA/II(u)/DLI/08/2021.2. Vide the impugned judgment, the learned Tribunal, whilecategorically holding the deceased to be a bona fide passenger travelling on a valid railway journey ticket, dismissed the claim application primarily on the ground that the appellant failed to establish that the death of the deceased occurred in an untoward incident within the meaning of Section ...
M/S J.P. Engineering Services vs Dr Asha Singh
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: May-04-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ RFA 156/2024, CM APPL. 13099/2024 (stay), CM APPL. 13101/2024 (delay) M/S J.P. ENGINEERING SERVICES .....Appellant Through: NoneversusDR ASHA SINGH .....Respondent Through: Mr. Raaj Malhotra, Mr. J Karan Malhotra, Mr. Ashok Ramanuja and Ms. Ranjita Biswas, Advocates.CORAM:HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NEENA BANSAL KRISHNAORDER% 04.05.20261. Learned counsel for the Respondent submits that the decree has been executed, possession taken and the Mesne Profits be realised.2. Nothing more survives in the Appeal.3. In view of the submissions made, the Appeal is disposed of as the Decree stands executed. The pending Applications also stand disposed of.NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA, J.MAY 04, 2026/RS This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 07/05/2026 at 12:48:16...
Naresh Pal and Ors vs Govt of Nct of Delhi and Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-04-2026
* IN THEHIGH COURTOF DELHIAT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 16204/2023 NARESH PAL AND ORS .....Petitioners Through: Mr. V. Subramoniam T.R., Mr. R. Bansal, Mr. Hari Vishnu Tiwari, Mr. Vashu Chaudhary and Mr. Harsh Anand, Advocates.versusGOVT OF NCT OF DELHI AND ORS .....Respondents Through: Ms. Avnish Ahlawat, SC for GNCTD Services with Mr. Nitesh Kumar Singh, Ms. Aliza Alam, Ms. Laavanya Kaushik and Mr. Mohnish Sehrawat, Advocates.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT SHARMAORDER% 08.09.20251. This hearing has been done through hybrid mode. CM APPL. 14689/2024 (exemption)2. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. Application is disposed of. REVIEW PET. 90/20243. The present review petition under Section 114 read with Order 47 Rule1 and Section 151 of the CPC seeks the following prayers:- (a) Review the judgment and order dated 24.01.2024 for the reasons stated above and the aforesaid writ petition may be heard on its own merits;(b) Any other relief which this Honble Court may deem fit and proper ...
- ‹ Prev
- 450
- 451
- 452
- 453
- 454
- 456
- 457
- 458
- 459
- 460
- Next ›
- Last »