Delhi Court May 2026 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Bh vs State Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-04-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI% Judgment Reserved on: 28.04.2026Judgment pronounced on: 04.05.2026+ CRL.A. 1062/2025 and CRL.M.A. 21877/2025 & CRL.M.(BAIL) BH .....Appellant Through: Mr. Vikram Singh, Mr. Sandeep Arya, Mr. Deepak Sharma, Ms. Nidhi Tiwari and Ms. Vishruti Chauhan, Advocates.versusSTATE NCT OF DELHI .....Respondent Through: Mr. Utkarsh, APP for the State. SI Sachin, PS BHD Nagar. Mr. Aniruddha Ghosh, Amicus Curiae for prosecutrix.CORAM:HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE CHANDRASEKHARAN SUDHAJUDGMENTCHANDRASEKHARAN SUDHA, J.1. In this appeal filed under Section 415(2) read with Section 528 Bhartiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (the B.N.S.S.) the appellant, the sole accused, in Sessions Case No.CRL.A. 1062/2025 Page 1 of 23 (FTSC) (POCSO)-02, South West District, Dwarka Courts, New Delhi, assails the judgment dated 13.12.2021 and the order on sentence dated 30.04.2022 as per which, he has been convicted and sentenced for the offences punishable under Section 6 ...
Vinod Kumar Garg (Ex. Jr. Engineer) vs Bses Yamuna Power Limited & Anr ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-04-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 9304/2025 VINOD KUMAR GARG (EX. JR. ENGINEER) .....Petitioner Through: Mr. V. K. Sharma and Ms. Sakshi, Advocates.versusBSES YAMUNA POWER LIMITED & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Sandeep Prabhakar, Senior Advocate with Mr. Vikas Mehta, Advocates for R-1.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV NARULAORDER% 04.05.20261. The Petitioner, a former Junior Engineer with BSES Yamuna PowerLimited/Respondent No. 1, has invoked Article 226 of the Constitution to assail order dated 14th May, 2025 passed by Respondent No. 1, rejecting his request for compassionate allowance under Rule 41 of the Central Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 2021.1 He further seeks directions for release of gratuity and leave encashment. Factual Background2. The Petitioner joined the erstwhile Delhi Electric Supply Undertaking in the late 1980s. He was appointed on regular basis as a Technical Helper on 3rd February, 1988 and was promoted from time to time. ...
Sh Pankaj Bakshi vs Union of India and Ors
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: May-04-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 14745/2021 SH PANKAJ BAKSHI .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Gagan Gandhi, Mr. Vijay Kumar, Ms. Priyamvada, Ms. Eesha Khanna and Ms. Shraddha Saxena, Advocates.versusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS .....Respondents Through: Mr. Himanshu Pathak, SPC along with Mr. Mohit Gupta, Advocates for R-1 & 2.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAVORDER% 04.05.20261. The instant petition is filed for the following reliefs:a) Direct the Respondent No.3 to provide employment to the Petitioner in lieu of as per the circular No.U.13018/46/2005 Delhi-I (NC) dated Court dated 27/11/2019 in writ petition no.11652/2018 titled as Delhi Sikh Gurdwara Management & Anr V Union of India & Ors; b) Direct the Respondent No.3 to pay compensation to the Petitioner for loss of income to be calculated from 2006 at the salary which he would have been entitled to draw; c) Pass any other order(s) and or direction(s) which this Honble Court deem...
M/S Aditya Enterprises vs Punjab National Bank
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-04-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CM(M) 2948/2024 & CM APPL. 40229/2024 M/S ADITYA ENTERPRISES .....Petitioner Through: None.versusPUNJAB NATIONAL BANK .....Respondent Through: Mr. Ajay Kumar Tyagi, Advocate.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJNEESH KUMAR GUPTAORDER% 04.05.20261. This hearing has been conducted through hybrid mode.2. As nobody has appeared on behalf of the petitioner, let the matter be called again at 02:30 PM. RAJNEESH KUMAR GUPTA, J MAY 4, 2026/nd/abk At 2:45 P.M.3. Nobody has appeared on behalf of the petitioner, despite the matter being called twice.4. Accordingly, the present petition is dismissed in default. Pending application (s), if any, also stand disposed of. RAJNEESH KUMAR GUPTA, J MAY 4, 2026/nd/abkThis is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 06/05/2026 at 11:54:15...
Aseem Takyar vs Indian Habitat Centre and Anr
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: May-04-2026
$~ R-9* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 1795/2013 ASEEM TAKYAR .....Petitioner Through: None.versusINDIAN HABITAT CENTRE AND ANR .....Respondents Through: Appearance not given.CORAM:HONBLE MR. JUSTICE PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAVORDER% 04.05.20261. None has appeared for the petitioner despite the matter being called out in second round.2. Petition stands dismissed for want of prosecution. PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV, J MAY 4, 2026/PThis is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 06/05/2026 at 13:02:03...
Yadram vs Union of India & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-04-2026
$~30 & 31* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 13429/2023 YADRAM .....Petitioner Through: Ms. Nitika Tyagi, Adv.versusUNION OF INDIA & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Ms. Mrinalini Sen, SC with Mr. Karan Mishra and Ms. Aditi Saxena, Advs. Mr. Sanjay Kumar Pathak, SC with Mr. Sunil Kumar Jha, Mr. Mohd Sueb Akhtar, Advs. + W.P.(C) 13430/2023 YADRAM & ORS. .....Petitioners Through: Ms. Nitika Tyagi, Adv.versusUNION OF INDIA & ANR. .....Respondent Through: Ms. Mrinalini Sen, SC with Mr. Karan Mishra and Ms. Aditi Saxena, Advs. Mr. Sanjay Kumar Pathak, SC with Mr. Sunil Kumar Jha, Mr. Mohd Sueb Akhtar, Advs.CORAM:JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH JUSTICE MADHU JAINORDER% 04.05.20261. This hearing has been done through hybrid mode.2. The present petitions have been filed by the Petitioners under Articles226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, inter alia, seeking issuance of an appropriate writ directing the Land Acquisition Collector (hereinafter, LAC), South-We...
Yadram & Ors. vs Union of India & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-04-2026
$~30 & 31* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 13429/2023 YADRAM .....Petitioner Through: Ms. Nitika Tyagi, Adv.versusUNION OF INDIA & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Ms. Mrinalini Sen, SC with Mr. Karan Mishra and Ms. Aditi Saxena, Advs. Mr. Sanjay Kumar Pathak, SC with Mr. Sunil Kumar Jha, Mr. Mohd Sueb Akhtar, Advs. + W.P.(C) 13430/2023 YADRAM & ORS. .....Petitioners Through: Ms. Nitika Tyagi, Adv.versusUNION OF INDIA & ANR. .....Respondent Through: Ms. Mrinalini Sen, SC with Mr. Karan Mishra and Ms. Aditi Saxena, Advs. Mr. Sanjay Kumar Pathak, SC with Mr. Sunil Kumar Jha, Mr. Mohd Sueb Akhtar, Advs.CORAM:JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH JUSTICE MADHU JAINORDER% 04.05.20261. This hearing has been done through hybrid mode.2. The present petitions have been filed by the Petitioners under Articles226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, inter alia, seeking issuance of an appropriate writ directing the Land Acquisition Collector (hereinafter, LAC), South-We...
Miss a vs State and Another
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: May-04-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CRL.M.C. 2191/2022, CRL.M.A. 9272/2022 MISS A .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Harshit Jain and Mr. Deepak Yadav, Advs.versusSTATE AND ANOTHER .....Respondents Through: Mr. Satish Kumar APP for State with Mr. Dinesh Kr., Ms. Upasna Bakshi and Ms. Divya Bakshi, Advs with SI Priyanka, PS: North Rohini Ms. Sakshi Sachdeva, Adv. for respondent no.2 (through VC)CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAURABH BANERJEEORDER% 04.05.20261. Considering the chargesheet has been filed before the learned Trial Court, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks leave to withdraw the present petition.2. As such, the present petition alongwith the pending application is dismissed as withdrawn. SAURABH BANERJEE, J MAY 4, 2026/SoThis is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 06/05/2026 at 12:13:04...
Prem Singh vs Registrar of Cooperative Societies and Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-04-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHIDate of decision: 4th May, 2026 Uploaded on: 8th May, 2026. + W.P.(C) 11210/2019 & CM APPL. 61446/2025 PREM SINGH .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Siddharth, AdvocateversusREGISTRAR OF COOPERATIVE SOCIETIES AND ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Lalit Sharma, Adv. for R-2.CORAM:JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH s JUSTICE MADHU JAIN Prathiba M. Singh J.,(Oral)1. This hearing has been done through hybrid mode.2. The present petition has been filed by the Petitioner under Article 226of the Constitution of India, inter alia, challenging the impugned order of the Delhi Co-Operative Tribunal dated 26th April, 2019 vide which the Award dated 22nd November, 2016 passed by the ld. Arbitrator was set aside.3. The Petitioner was appointed as Sweeper-cum-Water Boy cum Farashvide letter of the Bank i.e., The Parishad Co-operative Bank Ltd. (hereinafter Bank) dated 1st March, 1988. The said letter is extracted below: Dear Sir, We are pleased to inform you that the...
Rahul Kalyan and Ors vs Govt of Nct of Delhi and Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-04-2026
* IN THEHIGH COURTOF DELHIAT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 16417/2023 RAHUL KALYAN AND ORS .....Petitioners Through: Mr. V. Subramoniam T.R., Mr. R. Bansal, Mr. Hari Vishnu Tiwari, Mr. Vashu Chaudhary and Mr. Harsh Anand, Advocates.versusGOVT OF NCT OF DELHI AND ORS .....Respondents Through: Ms. Avnish Ahlawat, SC for GNCTD Services with Mr. Nitesh Kumar Singh, Ms. Aliza Alam, Ms. Laavanya Kaushik and Mr. Mohnish Sehrawat, Advocates. Mr. Gaurav Dhingra and Mr. Shashank Singh, Advocates for GNCTD.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT SHARMAORDER% 08.09.20251. This hearing has been done through hybrid mode. CM APPL. 14573/20242. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. Application is disposed of. REVIEW PET. 89/20243. The present review petition under Section 114 read with Order 47 Rule1 and Section 151 of the CPC seeks the following prayers:- (a) Review the judgment and order dated 24.01.2024 for the reasons stated above and the aforesaid writ petition may be heard on its own merits;(b) Any other r...
- ‹ Prev
- 449
- 450
- 451
- 452
- 453
- 455
- 456
- 457
- 458
- 459
- Next ›
- Last »