Delhi Court May 2026 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Dr Debajyoti Chakraborty & Anr. vs Union of India & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-04-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI% Judgment reserved on: 27.02.2026Judgment delivered on: 04.05.2026Judgment uploaded on: As per Digital Signature~+ W.P.(C) 13189/2023 DR R D THAKUR .....PetitionerversusUNION OF INDIA & ORS. ......Respondents Advocates who appeared in this case For the Petitioner : Mr. Ankur Chhibber, Adv. For the Respondents : Mr Nirvikar Verma, SPC.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAOHON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MANMEET PRITAM SINGH ARORAJUDGMENTV. KAMESWAR RAO, J.1. This writ petition was been filed by two petitioners. During the courseof hearing on 27.02.2026, we were informed that the Registry of this Court is in receipt of a letter addressed to the petitioners counsel/Mr. Ankur Chhibber, wherein the petitioner no. 1 namely Dr. Debajyoti Chakraborty has stated that, for medical reasons, he does not wish to pursue this petition. Accordingly, his name was deleted from the array of parties, with petitioner No.2/Dr. R. D. Thakur, as the petition...
Shyam Sunder & Ors. vs Municipal Corporation of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-04-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHIDate of decision: 4th May, 2026. Uploaded on: 7th May, 2026. + W.P.(C) 7042/2025& CM APPL. 31806/2025 SHYAM SUNDER & ORS. .....Petitioners Through: Mr. V.K. Mishra, Ms. Dipti Mishra, Ms. Sheetal Verma and Mr. S. Murli Manoharam, Advocates.versusMUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI .....Respondent Through: Ms. Puja S Kalra, Standing Counsel MCD.CORAM:JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH JUSTICE MADHU JAIN Prathiba M. Singh, J. (Oral)1. This hearing has been done through hybrid mode.2. The present petition has been filed by 10 vendors who seek a prayer that the Respondent-MCD ought not to disturb and demolish their peaceful vending at Harkesh Nagar, South Delhi.3. The details of the provisional certificates of vending (hereinafter,COV) of each of the Petitioners and their respective categories are set out below:- S.No. Name Provisional Category Certificate vending No. Petitioner No.1 Shyam Sundar URI 9345439 Food/Snack with Digitally Signed W.P.(C)...
Sun Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd & Anr. vs Nukind Healthcare P Ltd & ...
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: May-04-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CS(COMM) 525/2023 SUN PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRIES LTD & ANR. .....Plaintiffs Through: Mr. Rohit Pradhan and Mr. Sachin Gupta, Advocates.versusNUKIND HEALTHCARE P LTD & ORS. .....Defendants Through: Mr. Sushant Mahapatra, Advocate for D-1. Advocate for D-2 to 3, 5 to 8 (Appearance not given) None for D-4.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TUSHAR RAO GEDELAORDER% 04.05.20261. Mr. Pradhan, learned counsel appearing for the plaintiffs states thatdefendant no.4 is a manufacturer, who is manufacturing infringing products at the instance of defendant nos.1 to 3 and 5 to 8. He further states that since the plaintiffs have settled their inter-se disputes with the contesting defendant nos.1, 2, 3 and 5 to 8, the defendant no.4 may be deleted from the array of parties.2. Accordingly, at the oral request of Mr. Pradhan, learned counsel for theplaintiffs as also under the provisions of Order I Rule 10(2) of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (here...
Arif vs State of Nct Delhi Through Sho P.S Gokulpuri & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-04-2026
$~37-Q* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CRL.M.C. 3463/2025 ARIF .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Amresh Bind, Mr. Yash Maurya, Mr. Fairman M., Mr. S. Kumar, Advocates.versusSTATE OF NCT DELHI THROUGH SHO P.S GOKULPURI & ANR .....Respondents Through: Mr. Hitesh Vali, APP. SI Arvind Verma, PS-Gokal Puri. Appearance not given for R-2.CORAM:HONBLE MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALANORDER% 04.05.20261. The petitioner has filed this petition under Section 528 of theBharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 [BNSS] (corresponding to Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [CrPC]) seeking quashing of FIR No. 297/2017, dated 27.06.2017, registered at Police Station Gokul Puri, under Sections 498A/406/34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 [IPC], and all proceedings emanating therefrom, on the ground of settlement.2. Issue notice. Mr. Hitesh Vali, learned Additional Public Prosecutor, accepts notice on behalf of the State. Learned counsel accepts notice on behalf of respondent No. 2....
Shiv Murat Dwivedi vs Directorate of Enforcement
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-04-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 6616/2025 & CM APPL. 30082/2025 SHIV MURAT DWIVEDI .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Lakshay Yadav and Ms. Katyayani Vajpaye, Advs.versusDIRECTORATE OF ENFORCEMENT .....Respondent Through: Mr. Rahul Tyagi Standing Counsel for ED with Mr Sangeet Sibou Mr Aniket Kumar Singh and Mr Priyansh Raj Singh Senger, Advs.CORAM:HONBLE MR. JUSTICE PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAVORDER% 04.05.20261. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the petition has become rendered infructuous.2. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed as having rendered infructuous. PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV, J MAY 4, 2026/PThis is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 06/05/2026 at 13:07:30...
Dinesh Kumar and Anr vs Sunil Kumar and Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-04-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CM(M) 946/2025 & CM APPL. 31035/2025 DINESH KUMAR AND ANR .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Siddharth, Adv.versusSUNIL KUMAR AND ORS .....Respondents Through: Ms. Ishita Pancholi, Adv.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJNEESH KUMAR GUPTAORDER% 04.05.20261. This hearing has been conducted through hybrid mode.2. Learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that the present petition hasbecome infructuous as the suit has been disposed of vide judgment dated 30th January, 2026. It is prayed that the present petition be disposed of as withdrawn with liberty to raise all his rights and contentions in case any appeal is filed by the petitioners.3. Accordingly, the present petition stands disposed of as withdrawn with the liberty as prayed in accordance with law. Pending application(s), if any, are also disposed of. RAJNEESH KUMAR GUPTA, J MAY 4, 2026/ab/tpThis is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi...
Avon Enterprises Through Its Proprietor Anita Gupa vs Chibba Agro Pvt. ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-04-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI% Judgment reserved on: 24.03.2026Judgment pronounced on: 04.05.2026Judgment uploaded on: 05.05.2026+ RFA(COMM) 209/2024, CM APPL. 7735/2025 and CM APPL. 79644/2025 AVON ENTERPRISES THROUGH ITS PROPRIETOR ANITA GUPA .....Appellant Through: Ms. Kiran Bhardwaj, Ms. Ranjana Pathak and Ms. Prerna, Advs.versusCHIBBA AGRO PVT. LTD. ....Respondent Through: Mr. Ishaan Chawla and Mr. Anubhav Gupta, Advs.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KSHETARPALHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT MAHAJANJUDGMENTANIL KSHETARPAL, J.1. By way of the present Appeal, the Appellant (Defendant beforethe LDJ) seeks to assail the judgment and decree dated 16.01.2024 [hereinafter referred to as Impugned Judgment], passed by the learned District Judge [hereinafter referred to as LDJ], Saket Courts, Delhi, whereby the recovery suit filed by the Respondent (Plaintiff before the LDJ) came to be decreed in its favour.2. For the sake of clarity, consistency and ease of reference, the par...
Ht Media Ltd vs Salim Khan & Anr.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: May-04-2026
* IN THEHIGH COURTOF DELHIAT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 11420/2023 and CM APPL. 44439/2023 HT MEDIA LTD .....Petitioner Through: Ms. Raavi Birbal, Advocate with Mr.Arun Pathak, AGM legalversusSALIM KHAN & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Ms.Avni Singh, Advocate for GNCTDCORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR OHRIORDER% 04.05.20261. None for respondent no.1/workman.2. Learned counsel for the petitioner has handed over a copy of the orderdated 10.04.2026 passed by POLC-IX, Rouse Avenue District Court, New Delhi, the relevant portion is reproduced hereinbelow:- The parties have settled the dispute vide Mediation settlement dated 27.03.2026. The parties have confirmed the Mediation Settlement. In terms of the mediation settlement, the management has issued a cheque in favour of the workman, bearing cheque no. 202345 dated 23.03.2026, in sum of Rs. 5,00,000/- (Rupees five lakhs only), drawn on the Standard Chartered Bank. The workman has accepted the cheque. Photocopy of the cheque i...
Capt Amit Kumar Yadav vs Union of India & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-04-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI% Judgment reserved on: 13.04.2026Judgment delivered on: 04.05.2026Judgment uploaded on: As per Digital Signature~+ LPA 595/2023 CAPT AMIT KUMAR YADAV .....APPELLANTversusUNION OF INDIA & ORS .....RESPONDENTS Advocates who appeared in this case For the Appellant : Mr. Sanjeev Kumar and Mr. Anshul Sehgal, Advs. For the Respondents : Ms. Anjana Gosain, Ms. Akansha Choudhary and Ms. Shreya Manjari, Advs. for R1 and R2. Ms. Charul Sarin, Adv. for R3. Mr. Amit Kumar Mishra, Mr. Azeem Samuel, Ms. Mitakshara Goyal, Mr. Vaibhav Kharbanda, Mr. Shivam Goel, Ms. Shrijeta Pratik, Advs. for R4.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAOHON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MANMEET PRITAM SINGH ARORAJUDGMENTV. KAMESWAR RAO, J.1. This intra court appeal lays a challenge to the order dated 11.07.2023 passed by the learned Single Judge whereby the learned Single Judge has dismissed the writ petition filed by the appellant challenging the orders Signed By:PRADEEP L...
Tushar Verma vs Union of India & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-04-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 7352/2025 & CM APPL. 33045/2025 Date of Decision: 04.05.2026 IN THE MATTER OF: TUSHAR VERMA S/o LALIT KUMAR VERMA WZ-I 061 122, RAJOURI GARDEN EXTENSION,WEST DISTRICT, NEW DELHI - IIOO27 .....PETITIONER (Through: Mr. Tushar Lamba and Mr. Jujar Singh Puri, Advs.)VersusI. UNION OF INDIA, (THROUGH ITS SECRETARY) MINISTRY OF HOME AFFAIRS, GOVERNMENT OF INDIA, NEWDELHI_IlOOOl2. CYBER POLICE STATION, VADODARA CITY, GUJARAT - 390006 (THROUGH ITS INCHARGE)3. HDFC BANK LIMITED, (THROUGH ITS BRANCH MANAGER) TILAK NAGAR BRANCH, WEST DISTRICT NEW DELHI 4. THE RESERVE BANK OF INDIA, (THROUGH ITS GOVERNOR) SANSAD MARG, NEWDELHI-lIOOOI5. INDIAN CYBER CRIME COORDINATION CENTRE NATIONAL CYBER CRIME REPORTING PORTAL (THROUGH ITS DIRECTOR) JAI SINGH ROAD, NEW DELHI _ l IOOOI .... RESPONDENTS(Through: Mr Farman Ali CGSC, Ms. Usha Jamnal adv for UOI. Ms. Shimpy Arman Sharma and Mr. Khushal madan, Advs. for R-3. Ms. Tanya Chowdhary, Ms. Nisha Shar...
- ‹ Prev
- 447
- 448
- 449
- 450
- 451
- 453
- 454
- 455
- 456
- 457
- Next ›
- Last »