Delhi Court May 2026 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Rambir Tanwar vs the State Govt. of Nct of Delhi & Ors.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: May-04-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CRL.M.C. 3392/2026 RAMBIR TANWAR .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Arun Sharma, Advocate alongwith the petitioner.versusTHE STATE GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Ms. Richa Dhawan, APP for the State. SI Sohan Lal and SI Vikas Yadav, P.S. Fatehpur Beri. Mr. Pradeep Bidhuri, Advocate for R-2 and 3 alongwith respondents Nos. 2 and 3.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANUP JAIRAM BHAMBHANIORDER% 04.05.2026 CRL.M.A. 13686/2026 (exemption) Exemption granted, subject to just exceptions. The application stands disposed-of. CRL.M.C. 3392/2026 By way of the present petition filed under section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita 2023, the petitioner seeks quashing of case FIR No. 0431/2021 dated 08.10.2021 registered under sections 186/353/332/506 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) at P.S.: Fatehpur Beri, South Delhi.2. The petition is premised on Memorandum of Undertaking (MoU) dated 18.09.2025, whereby the petitioner an...
Tejas Water Solutions Through Prop Umesh Sagar Through Its Proprietor ...
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: May-04-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CM(M) 1007/2026, CM APPL. 29577/2026, CM APPL. 29578/2026 & CM APPL. 29579/2026 TEJAS WATER SOLUTIONS THROUGH PROP UMESH SAGAR THROUGH ITS PROPRIETOR SHRI UMESH SAGAR .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Satya Prakash Sharma, Mr. Narender Singh Yadav and Mr. Mudit Bansal, Advocates.versusAIRVAK BLOWERS PVT LTD .....Respondent Through: None.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJNEESH KUMAR GUPTAORDER% 04.05.20261. This hearing has been conducted through hybrid mode.2. Learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that he wants to withdraw the present petition due to some technical defect, with liberty to file afresh.3. Keeping in view the submissions made by the learned Counsel for thepetitioner, the present petition is disposed of as withdrawn, with liberty as sought, in accordance with law. Pending application(s), if any, also stand disposed of. RAJNEESH KUMAR GUPTA, J MAY 4, 2026/nd/ik This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the o...
Mannat Vij and Ors vs State Nct of Delhi and Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-04-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(CRL) 1423/2026, CRL.M.A. 13694/2026 MANNAT VIJ AND ORS .....Petitioners Through: Ms. Sanigdha Sood Madan and Mr. Sumit Madan, Advs.versusSTATE NCT OF DELHI AND ANR .....Respondents Through: Mr. Sanjay Lao, ASC for the State SI- Priyank Kumar, PS: Anand ViharCORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAURABH BANERJEEORDER% 04.05.20261. By virtue of the present petition under Article 226 of theConstitution of India read with Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (BNSS), the petitioners seek quashing of the FIR No.483/2025 dated 20.11.2025 registered at PS.: Anand Vihar, Delhi under Sections 115(2)/126(2)/351(3)/3(5) of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 (BNS) and Section 10 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 (POCSO Act) and all proceedings emanating therefrom, in view of Memorandum of Understanding dated 27.04.2026(MoU) (Annexure C), whereby the petitioners and the respondent no.2 have mutually and ami...
Union of India & Ors. vs Seema Choudhary
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-04-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 6018/2026, CM APPL. 29679/2026, CM APPL. UNION OF INDIA & ORS. .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Vijay Joshi, CGSC.versusSEEMA CHOUDHARY .....Respondent Through: Mr. Aditya Chhibber, Adv.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C. HARI SHANKARHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE OM PRAKASH SHUKLAJUDGMENT(ORAL) % 04.05.2026C.HARI SHANKAR, J.1. Following her participation in the Central Police OrganizationExamination held by the Staff Selection Commission in 2018, the respondent was informed, by letter dated 10 August 2021, issued by the Deputy Commissioner of Police (Recruitment)1 that she had been selected as Sub-Inspector2 (Executive) (Female) in the Delhi Police.2. She was directed to report at the Recruitment Cell on 19 August2021 along with relevant documents to collect her offer of appointment and was further directed to report to the Delhi Police Academy on any day between 1 October 2021 and 10 October 2021 for training. DCP, hereinafter Signat...
Mana Devi vs Arjun Lal and Ors
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: May-04-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 6020/2026 MANA DEVI .....Petitioner Through: Mr.Akash Singh, Advocate.VersusARJUN LAL AND ORS .....Respondents Through: Mr. Rajat Mohan Dwivedi, Advocate for R-2. Ms. Anasuya Choudhury SPC and Mr.Rajat Mohan Dwivedi GP for R-3 and 4.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAVORDER% 04.05.2026 CM APPL. 29684/2026 (for exemption)1. Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions.2. The application stands disposed of. W.P.(C) 6020/20261. The nature of relief sought in the instant petition is not directlyamenable under writ jurisdiction. The petitioner has to take remedy under the provisions of the Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act, 2007 (Act of 2007). There does not seem to be any proper application, as required, before the concerned authority.2. For the said reason, the instant petition stands dismissed.3. Liberty is, however, granted to the petitioner to undertake the appropriate exercise ...
Sabhyata Cotton Pvt. Ltd. vs Puneet Budhiraja
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-04-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHIDate of decision: 4th May, 2026 Uploaded on: 7th May, 2026 + RFA(COMM) 135/2024 SABHYATA COTTON PVT. LTD. .....Appellant Through: Mr. Vaibhav Suri, Mr. Pulkit Shree and Mr. Aryan Jalali, Advs.versusPUNEET BUDHIRAJA .....Respondent Through: None.CORAM:JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH JUSTICE MADHU JAIN Prathiba M. Singh, J. (Oral)1. This hearing has been done through hybrid mode.2. This appeal has been filed against the judgment and decree dated 16th December, 2023 (hereinafter, the impugned judgment) passed by the ld. District Judge, Commercial Court, Saket Court, New Delhi.3. Vide the impugned judgment, the ld. District Judge has dismissed the suit for recovery instituted by the Appellant, as also the counter claim filed by the Respondent.4. As per the impugned judgment the suit of the Appellant has beendismissed on the ground that the delivery of goods has not been demonstrated by the Appellant and that the proof of acknowledgement of delivery o...
State of Nct of Delhi vs Deepak
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-04-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHIReserved on: 22.04.2026Pronounced on: 04.05.2026+ CRL. A.236/2021 STATE OF NCT OF DELHI .....Appellant Through: Mr.Aman Usman, APP with Mr.Manvendra Yadav, Mr.Atiq Ur Rehman, Advs. SI Sandip Bishnoi, PS- Mayapuri.VersusDEEPAK .....Respondent Through: Mr. Dinesh Malik, Mr. Akash Saini, Mr. Puneet Jain, Mr. Lavish Arora, Advs. with respondent.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLAHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVINDER DUDEJAJUDGMENTRAVINDER DUDEJA, J.1. State takes exception to the judgment dated 18th December,2019, whereby, the respondent Deepak has been acquitted of all the charges levelled against him in SC No. 123/2014, in case FIR No. referred to as the IPC] & Section 4 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 [hereinafter referred to as (POCSO Act)]. Signed By:VAISHALICRL. A. 236/2021 Page 1 of 21 FACTUAL MATRIX:2. The brief facts of the case, as per charge sheet, are that on 09thMay, 2014, on receipt of DD No. ...
Standard Chartered Bank vs Union of India and Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-04-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHIReserved on: 25.02.2026 Date of decision: 04.05.2026 Uploaded on: 04.05.2026 + W.P.(C) 615/2017 & CM APPL. 2792/2017 STANDARD CHARTERED BANK .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Sudhir Nandrajanog, Sr.Adv. with Mr. Amol Sharma, Mr. Ateev Mathur, Ms. Jagruti Ahuja, Mr. Sanjay Gupta & Mr. Ankita Singh, Advs.versusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS .....Respondents Through: Mr. Kaoliangpou Kamei, Adv. Mr. Zain Haider, Adv. Dr. Monika Arora, CGSC with Mr. Subhrodeep Sahra, Mr. Prabhat Kumar, Ms. Anamika Thakur & Mr. Abhinav Verma, Advs.CORAM:HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SHAIL JAINJUDGMENTSHAIL JAIN, J.1. The present writ petition has been filed by the Petitioner, StandardChartered Bank, under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, assailing the decision taken by the Central Advisory Contract Labour Board (hereinafter referred to as the Board) in its 90th meeting held on 04.11.2016, the minutes whereof were circulated on 30.12.2016, whereby the Board dir...
Delhi Metro Rail Corporation Ltd vs Gyt Tpl Joint Venture
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-04-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHIDate of decision: 04th MAY, 2026 IN THE MATTER OF: + O.M.P. (COMM) 202/2021 & I.A. 9690-9692/2021 DELHI METRO RAIL CORPORATION LTD .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Tarun Johri and Mr. Vishwajeet Tyagi, AdvocatesversusGYT TPL JOINT VENTURE .....Respondent Through: Mr Jayant Mehta, Senior Advocate, Mr. Tushad Cooper, Senior Advocate with Mr. Dhirendra Negi, Ms. Pragya Chauhan, Mr. Shaurya Rohit and Mr. Pallav Arora, Advocates.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUBRAMONIUM PRASADJUDGMENT1. The present Petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration andConciliation Act, 1996 (the Act) has been filed by the Petitioner, challenging the Majority Arbitral Award dated 28.04.2021 (Impugned Award) passed by the Arbitral Tribunal with respect to the disputes between the parties, arising out and in relation to the Contract Agreement dated 07.01.2015 executed between the parties.2. The Petitioner is a company incorporated under the relevant provisions of the Co...
Aditya Birla Capital Limited vs Ags Transact Technologies Limited & Or ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-04-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHIDate of decision: 04.05.2026 + O.M.P.(I) (COMM.) 139/2025, I.A. 10115/2025 (Ex. From filing lengthy synopsis and list of dates) & I.A. 10855/2025 (Proposing to secure and amicably settle the dispute with the petitioner and its creditor) ADITYA BIRLA CAPITAL LIMITED .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Rajshekhar Rao, Senior Advocate along with Ms. Amrita Narayan, Mr. Ishaan Duggal, Ms. Ruchi Goyal and Mr. Siddhant Singh, Advocates.versusAGS TRANSACT TECHNOLOGIES LIMITED & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Ms. Vasundhara Bakhru, Ms. Pallavi Pratap and Ms. Yashvi Aswani, Advocates for Respondent Nos. 2 and 3.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARISH VAIDYANATHANSHANKAR % JUDGEMENT (ORAL)HARISH VAIDYANATHAN SHANKAR, J.1. The present Petition has been instituted under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 19961, seeking the following reliefs:Act O.M.P.(I) (COMM.) 139/2025 Page 1 of 6 a. Pass an order directing the Respondent Nos. 1 to ...
- ‹ Prev
- 445
- 446
- 447
- 448
- 449
- 451
- 452
- 453
- 454
- 455
- Next ›
- Last »