Delhi Court May 2026 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Abhishek Aggarwal & Anr. vs the State (Govt. of Nct of Delhi & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-04-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI% Date of Decision: 04th May, 2026 + CRL.M.C. 3431/2026 & CRL.M.A. 13882/2026 ABHISHEK AGGARWAL & ANR. .....Petitioner Through: Ms. Pooja Aggarwal, Advocates along with petitioners.versusTHE STATE (GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR. .....Respondent Through: Mr. Manoj Pant, APP with SI Lokesh Kumar. Mr. Sugam Mishra, Advocate along with respondent No.2.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ JAINJ U D G M E N T (oral)1. Petitioners herein seek quashing of FIR No. 369/2024 dated consequential proceedings arising therefrom, on the basis of compromise arrived at between the parties.2. The marriage between complainant (respondent No.2 herein) and petitioner No.1 was solemnized on 01.06.2022, as per Hindu rites and customs. No child is born from the abovesaid wedlock.3. However, on account of temperamental differences, the parties started residing separately and when a complaint was lodged by respondent No.2, it resulted into registration of t...
Arun Kumar & Anr. vs State Govt. of Nct of Delhi & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-04-2026
$~104-Q* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CRL.M.C. 3379/2026 & CRL.M.A. 13653/2026 ARUN KUMAR & ANR. .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Hemant Kumar, Mr. Adeel Ahmed, Advs.versusSTATE GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Hitesh Vali, APP Mr. Vikrant Panchnanda, SPP with Mr. Mukul Katyal, Advs. For CBI Mr. Munish Kumar Sharma, Mr. Sachin Kumar, Advs for R-2CORAM:HONBLE MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALANORDER% 04.05.20261. The petitioners have filed this petition under Section 528 of theBharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 [BNSS] (corresponding to Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 ["CrPC"]), seeking quashing of FIR No. 393/2022 dated 20.07.2022, registered at Police Station Harsh Vihar, District North East, under Sections 498A/406/34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 [IPC], alongwith all consequential proceedings emanating therefrom, on the ground of settlement.2. Issue notice. Mr. Hitesh Vali, learned Additional Public Prosecut...
Mohd Dilshad vs Delhi Agricultural Marketing Board & Ors.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: May-04-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 6039/2026 and CM APPL. 29731/2026 MOHD DILSHAD .....Petitioner Through: Ms. Neha Rai with Mr. Shivam Shivhare, AdvocatesversusDELHI AGRICULTURAL MARKETING BOARD & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mrs Avnish Ahlawat SC with Mr.Uday Singh Ahlawat and Ms.Tania Ahlawat, Advocates for R- 1. Mr Shiven Varma Panel Counsel for R-GNCTDCORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAVORDER% 04.05.2026 CM APPL. 29732/2026 (for exemption)1. Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions.2. The application stands disposed of. W.P.(C) 6039/2026 and CM APPL. 29731/20261. The instant petition is for the following reliefs:-a. Issue a Writ of Mandamus and/or Certiorari, or any other appropriate Writ, Order, or Direction directing the Respondents, to re- allot the Shop No. 12 in the premises of Gazipur Murga Mandi to the Petitioner, strictly in accordance with the binding Resolution No. Poultry & Egg Marketing Committee on 16.10.2...
Kapoor Chand Sharma & Ors. vs the State of Nct of Delhi & Anr.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: May-04-2026
$~121-Q* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(CRL) 1437/2026 & CRL.M.A. 13843/2026 KAPOOR CHAND SHARMA & ORS. .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Akshit Tomar, Advocate.versusTHE STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Sanjay Lao, SC. ASI Sherpal Singh, PS-Madhu Vihar. Mr. Kuldeep Singh, Adv. For respondent No. 2CORAM:HONBLE MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALANORDER% 04.05.20261. By way of the present petition under Article 226 of theConstitution, the petitioners seek quashing of FIR No. 6/2026 dated 05.01.2026 registered at Police Station Madhu Vihar, District East, Delhi, for offences punishable under Sections 115/126(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 [BNS] along with all consequential proceedings arising therefrom, on the ground of settlement.2. Issue notice. Notice is accepted by Mr. Sanjay Lao, learned Standing Counsel, accepts notice on behalf of the State. Mr. Kuldeep Singh, learned counsel, accepts notice on behalf of respondent No. 2.3. The...
Devender Sehrawat & Ors. vs the State of Nct of Delhi & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-04-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI% Date of Decision: 04th May, 2026 + CRL.M.C. 3402/2026 & CRL.M.A. 13731/2026 DEVENDER SEHRAWAT & ORS. .....Petitioner Through: Mr. B.S. Jakhar, Mr. Vikram Singh Jakhar, Mr. Neeraj Jakhar, Ms. Bhawna Jakhar, Mr. Shubham Dabas, Mr. Viraj Rathee and Mr. Pulak Kathpalia, Advocates. Petitioners in person.versusTHE STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR. .....Respondent Through: Mr. Sunil Kumar Gautam, APP for the State with ASI Ramaniwas. Mr. Deepak Kumar, Advocate for R-2 alongwith Respondent No.2 in person.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ JAINJ U D G M E N T (oral)1. Petitioners herein seek quashing of FIR No. 0055/2024 dated consequential proceedings arising therefrom, on the basis of compromise arrived at between the parties.2. The marriage between complainant (respondent No.2 herein) and petitioner No.1 was solemnized on 09.12.2020, as per Hindu rites and customs. There is no child from the abovesaid wedlock. Signed By:SONIA CRL.M.C. 34...
Tilak Raj & Ors. vs State Govt. of Nct of Delhi and Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-04-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CRL.M.C. 3426/2026, CRL.M.A. 13860/2026 TILAK RAJ & ORS. .....Petitioners Through: Ms. Shikha Yadav, Adv. with petitioners in personversusSTATE GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI AND ANR .....Respondents Through: Mr. Satish Kumar, APP with Ms. Upasna Bakshi, Mr. Dinesh Kumar, and Ms. Divya Bakshi, Advocates Mr. Siddhartha Verma and Ms. Krishpreet Kaur, Advs. for R-2 with R-2 present in person SI Vinod Kumar, PS.: Palam Village, Delhi.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAURABH BANERJEEORDER% 04.05.20261. By virtue of the present petition under Section 528 of the BharatiyaNagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, the petitioners seek quashing of FIR No. Sections 498A/406/34/354/506 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) and all proceedings emanating therefrom, in view of the Settlement dated 16.12.2024 [Annexure P3] arrived between the petitioners and the respondent no.2 before the Counselling Cell, Family Courts, South-West District, Dwarka Delhi, which is acco...
Surinder Kumar Jain vs Delhi Development Authority & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-04-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 6024/2026 & CM APPL. 29779/2026 SURINDER KUMAR JAIN .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Sujeet Beniwal, Advocate.versusDELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Ms. Shobhana Takiar, SC, DDA with Mr. Prateek Dhir and Mr. Kuljeet Singh, Advocates for DDA. Mr. Sanjay Kumar Pathak, SC, L&B with Mr. Sunil Kumar Jha, Mr. M. S. Akhtar, Ms. Joohu Kumari and Mr. Kushagra Dixit, Advocates.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV NARULAORDER% 04.05.20261. The Petitioner claims to be the lawful owner of various parcels of landsituated in Village Kadipur, Alipur, Delhi, and alleges that the said properties are under encroachment and unauthorised construction; accordingly, the present petition has been filed seeking a direction to the Respondent authorities to carry out measurement and demarcation of the said land.2. After making some submissions, counsel for the Petitioner seeks leave to withdraw the present petition w...
Vipin and Anr vs the State Nct of Delhi and Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-04-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI% Date of Decision: 04th May, 2026 + W.P.(CRL) 1427/2026 & CRL.M.A. 13748/2026 VIPIN AND ANR .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Kulbhushan Kataria, Ms. Vandana, Mr. Ravi Kumar and Mr. Mahesh Chand, Advocates.versusTHE STATE NCT OF DELHI AND ANR .....Respondent Through: Mr. Sanjay Lao, Standing Counsel(Crl) for the State with SI Akanksha. Mr. Shivam Ujjainwal, Advocate for R-2 alongwith respondent No.2 in person.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ JAINJ U D G M E N T (oral)1. Petitioners herein seek quashing of FIR No. 0012/2026 dated with all consequential proceedings arising therefrom, on the basis of compromise arrived at between the parties.2. The abovesaid FIR was registered on the basis of complaint made byNeeraj (respondent No.2), who at the relevant time, was driving his Alto Car. Some scuffle took place with the occupants of another vehicle i.e. Brezza Car as the abovesaid Brezza Car was being driven in violation of traffic rules and S...
Shahrukh & Anr. vs the State Nct of Delhi and Anr
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: May-04-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CRL.M.C. 3408/2026 & CRL.M.A. 13747/2026 SHAHRUKH & ANR. .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Laksh Joshi, AdvocateversusTHE STATE NCT OF DELHI AND ANR .....Respondents Through: Mr. Hemant Mehla, APP for the StateCORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GIRISH KATHPALIAORDER% 04.05.20261. Petitioners seek quashing of FIR No.2722/2015 of PS Shakarpur for offence under Section 452/323/506/342/427/34 IPC on the ground that respondent no.2 has settled the disputes with the petitioners.2. At the outset, learned APP discloses that there are four persons injured in the incident, but the settlement has been with only one of them.3. On this, learned counsel for petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this petition with liberty to file afresh in case the dispute with remaining injured persons gets settled.4. As requested, the petition along with the pending application is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as sought. GIRISH KATHPALIA, J MAY 4, 2026 rsTh...
Siya Ray vs State (Nct of Delhi)
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: May-04-2026
$~52 & 54* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ BAIL APPLN. 1702/2026 & CRL.M.A. 13690/2026 VIVEK KUMAR .....Petitioner + BAIL APPLN. 1706/2026 & CRL.M.A. 13714/2026 SIYA RAY .....PetitionerCORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ JAINORDER% 04.05.20261. Both the applications being connected are being taken together.2. Both the applicants seek anticipatory bail in case FIR No. 0114/2026 dated 21.02.2026 registered at Police Station Lahori Gate. BAIL APPLN. 1702/2026 & BAIL APPLN. 1706/2026 13. FIR was, initially, registered for commission of offences underSections 126(2)/115(2)/3(5) of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 (corresponding Sections 341/323/34 IPC but after the demise of the victim two days later, penal Section 105 of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 (corresponding Section 304 IPC) pertaining to culpable homicide not amounting to murder has also been added.4. As per prosecution, FIR was registered on the basis of informationreceived regarding admission of inj...
- ‹ Prev
- 444
- 445
- 446
- 447
- 448
- 450
- 451
- 452
- 453
- 454
- Next ›
- Last »