Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Arjit Tyagi vs Directorate General of Foreign Trade

Arjit Tyagi vs Directorate General of Foreign Trade

Type Court Judgment Court Delhi Orders Decided May 04, 2026
~1 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1263670

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Delhi Orders High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
W.P.(C)/6052/2026
Subject
Land Acquisition

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Land Acquisition

Key legal issue
Land Acquisition

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Arjit Tyagi

Advocate Ms. Mannat Sandhu, Ms. Vritti Jain

Respondent

Directorate General of Foreign Trade

Excerpt

* in the high court of delhi at new delhi+ w.p.(c) 6052/2026 and cm appl. 29806/2026 arjit tyagi .....petitioner through: ms. mannat sandhu, ms. vritti jain, advocates.versusdirectorate general of foreign trade .....respondent through: mr.vinay yadav, cgsc with mr.mrityunjay mahendra gp.coram:hon'ble mr. justice purushaindra kumar kauravorder% 04.05.2026 cm appl. 29807/2026 (for exemption)1. exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions.2. the application stands disposed of. w.p.(c) 6052/2026 and cm appl. 29806/20261. the petitioner vide the instant petition seeks for directions against therespondent- directorate general of foreign trade (hereinafter ‘dgft’) to deal with the petitioner’s complaints/ representations. the petitioner submits that he has shown concern regarding regulatory violations by certain dgft approved pre-shipment inspection agencies (hereinafter ‘psias’).2. having considered the submissions made by learned counsel for the parties, the court deems it appropriate to direct the dgft to deal with thepetitioner’s representations in accordance with law and to communicate the reasons to the petitioner within a period of two months from the date of receipt of copy of the order passed today.3. with these observations, the instant petition stands disposed of.4. all rights and contentions of the parties are left open. purushaindra kumar kaurav, j may 4, 2026 nc

Full Judgment

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+ W.P.(C) 6052/2026 and CM APPL. 29806/2026 ARJIT TYAGI .....Petitioner Through: Ms. Mannat Sandhu, Ms. Vritti Jain, Advocates.

versus

DIRECTORATE GENERAL OF FOREIGN TRADE .....Respondent Through: Mr.Vinay Yadav, CGSC with Mr.Mrityunjay Mahendra GP.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV

ORDER

% 04.05.2026 CM APPL. 29807/2026 (for exemption)

1. Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions.

2. The application stands disposed of. W.P.(C) 6052/2026 and CM APPL. 29806/2026

1. The petitioner vide the instant petition seeks for directions against the

respondent- Directorate General of Foreign Trade (hereinafter ‘DGFT’) to deal with the petitioner’s complaints/ representations. The petitioner submits that he has shown concern regarding regulatory violations by certain DGFT approved Pre-Shipment Inspection Agencies (hereinafter ‘PSIAs’).

2. Having considered the submissions made by learned counsel for the parties, the Court deems it appropriate to direct the DGFT to deal with the

petitioner’s representations in accordance with law and to communicate the reasons to the petitioner within a period of two months from the date of receipt of copy of the order passed today.

3. With these observations, the instant petition stands disposed of.

4. All rights and contentions of the parties are left open. PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV, J MAY 4, 2026 Nc

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial