Vinay Kumar Sharma vs Ruby Newton

Type Court Judgment Court Delhi Orders Decided May 04, 2026

~2 min read

https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1260993

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

Citation: sooperkanoon.com/1260993
Court: Delhi Orders High Court
Judge: Hon'Ble Mr. Justice Prateek Jalan
Decided On: May 04, 2026
Case Number: W.P.(CRL)/1080/2026
Subject: Service Tax

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Service Tax

Key legal issue: Service Tax

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Vinay Kumar Sharma

Advocate Mr. Nitesh Gupta, Ms. Deeksha Sharma

Respondent

Ruby Newton

Advocate Ms. Deeksha Sharma

Excerpt

.....of settlement between the parties. the parties are both present and are represented by counsel. with their consent, the application is allowed and the petition is taken up on board.w.p.(crl) 1080/20261. by way of the present petition under article 226 of theconstitution, the petitioner assails the order dated 20.02.2025, whereby the maintainability of a complaint filed by the respondent under the domestic violence act, 2005, was upheld by the learned magistrate’sw.p.(crl) 1080/2026 page 1 of 3court, as well as the order dated 14.03.2026, whereby the learnedsessions court dismissed the revision petition filed against the orderdated 20.02.2025.2. during the pendency of the present petition, the petitioner and therespondent have amicably settled their disputes and entered into a memorandum of understanding [“mou”] dated 28.04.2026, a copy whereof has been placed on record alongwith crl.m.a. no. 12,00,000/- by the petitioner in favour of the daughter of the respondent in three tranches. the first tranche of rs. 5,00,000/- was paid upon execution of the mou, the second tranche of rs. 5,00,000/- is to be paid upon withdrawal of the present petition filed by the petitioner and crl.rev.p. no. 1207/2023 filed by the respondent.3. mr. nitesh gupta, learned counsel for the petitioner, has handedover a demand draft of rs. 5,00,000/- to ms. deeksha sharma, learned counsel for the respondent, and seeks permission to withdraw the present petition.4. ms. sharma, on instructions from the respondent, who is present incourt, undertakes that crl.rev.p. 1207/2023, which is listed before a coordinate bench of this court today, will also be withdrawn with the permission of the court.5. the final tranche of rs. 2,00,000/- is to be paid upon therespondent withdrawing proceedings under the domestic violence act, out of which the present petition arises.6. having regard to the aforesaid settlement, mr. gupta seekspermission to withdraw this.....

Full Judgment

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+ W.P.(CRL) 1080/2026 VINAY KUMAR SHARMA .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Nitesh Gupta, Advocate.

versus

RUBY NEWTON .....Respondent Through: Ms. Deeksha Sharma, Advocate.

CORAM:

HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALAN

ORDER

% 04.05.2026 CRL.M.A. 13704/2026 (for early hearing) The petitioner has filed this application for early hearing of the captioned petition on the ground of settlement between the parties. The parties are both present and are represented by counsel. With their consent, the application is allowed and the petition is taken up on Board.

W.P.(CRL) 1080/2026

1. By way of the present petition under Article 226 of the

Constitution, the petitioner assails the order dated 20.02.2025, whereby the maintainability of a complaint filed by the respondent under the Domestic Violence Act, 2005, was upheld by the learned Magistrate’s

W.P.(CRL) 1080/2026 Page 1 of 3

Court, as well as the order dated 14.03.2026, whereby the learned

Sessions Court dismissed the revision petition filed against the order

dated 20.02.2025.

2. During the pendency of the present petition, the petitioner and the

respondent have amicably settled their disputes and entered into a Memorandum of Understanding [“MoU”] dated 28.04.2026, a copy whereof has been placed on record alongwith CRL.M.A. No. 12,00,000/- by the petitioner in favour of the daughter of the respondent in three tranches. The first tranche of Rs. 5,00,000/- was paid upon execution of the MoU, the second tranche of Rs. 5,00,000/- is to be paid upon withdrawal of the present petition filed by the petitioner and CRL.REV.P. No. 1207/2023 filed by the respondent.

3. Mr. Nitesh Gupta, learned counsel for the petitioner, has handed

over a demand draft of Rs. 5,00,000/- to Ms. Deeksha Sharma, learned counsel for the respondent, and seeks permission to withdraw the present petition.

4. Ms. Sharma, on instructions from the respondent, who is present in

Court, undertakes that CRL.REV.P. 1207/2023, which is listed before a coordinate Bench of this Court today, will also be withdrawn with the permission of the Court.

5. The final tranche of Rs. 2,00,000/- is to be paid upon the

respondent withdrawing proceedings under the Domestic Violence Act, out of which the present petition arises.

6. Having regard to the aforesaid settlement, Mr. Gupta seeks

permission to withdraw this petition.

W.P.(CRL) 1080/2026 Page 2 of 3

7. The petition, alongwith the pending applications, is dismissed as

withdrawn in terms of the settlement.

8. The next date of hearing already fixed, i.e., 06.07.2026, stands

cancelled.

PRATEEK JALAN, J

MAY 4, 2026

‘Bhupi/JM’/

W.P.(CRL) 1080/2026 Page 3 of 3

Same Court & Year Delhi Orders · 2026 Same Parties Vinay Kumar Sharma vs Ruby Newton Same Subject Service Tax Same Judge Hon'Ble Mr. Justice Prateek Jalan