Delhi Court April 2026 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Mayadevi vs State Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Apr-01-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ BAIL APPLN. 4345/2024, CRL.M.A. 35520/2024, 35519/2024, MAYADEVI .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Vimal Tyagi and Mr. Balaji Pathak, AdvocateversusSTATE NCT OF DELHI .....Respondent Through: Mr. Amit Ahlawat, APP for State with Inspector Devender Dhaiya and Inspector JitenderCORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GIRISH KATHPALIAORDER% 01.04.20261. The accused/applicant seeks regular bail in case FIR No. 273/2021ofPolice Station GTB Enclave for offence under Section Act. 1.1 This bail application came up for the first hearing on 27.11.2024 before the predecessor bench and thereafter continued getting adjourned before different benches. Along with 179 such old pending bail applications, this application also was transferred to this bench. 1.2 Today is the first effective hearing before me. I have heard learned counsel for accused/applicant as well as learned APP for State.2. After addressing partly, learned counsel for accused/applicant oninstructi...
Sonia Kalra vs Delhi Development Authority & Ors.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Apr-01-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 16110/2024 & CM APPL. 67701/2024 SONIA KALRA ....Petitioner Through: Mr. Pulkit Aggarwal Adv. with Petitioner- In-PersonversusDELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. R. K. Dhawan, SC for DDA with Adv. Ms. Nisha Dhawan, Mr. Pawan Karan Deo, Mr. V. K. Teng, Advs. Mr Sanjeev Sabharwal, SC, MCD Mr. Brijesh Yadav, SPC with Ms. Nikita, Mr. Sandeep Yadav, Mr. Anirudh Nagar, Mr. Rahul Yadav, Mr. Kunal Chaudhary, Mr. Amarjeet Singh for R3(SHO Vikas Puri) Ms. Nidhi Nagpal, Adv. for R4-6CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASMEET SINGHORDER% 01.04.20261. This is a writ petition filed under Articles 226 and 227 of theConstitution of India seeking the following prayers:- a) A writ of mandamus and appropriate directions be passed directing the respondents to remove and demolish the unauthorized construction raised in the form of a hall at the parking/stilt area adjoining and adjacent to the said Flat no. A-25 of P...
Directorate of Enforcement vs M/S Trident Infosol Private Limited
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-01-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ MISC. APPEAL(PMLA) 79/2025 & CM APPL. 68509/2025 - STAY DIRECTORATE OF ENFORCEMENT .....Appellant Through: Mr. Vivek Gurnani, Panel Counsel for ED.versusM/S TRIDENT INFOSOL PRIVATE LIMITED .....Respondent Through: Mr. Pavan Narang, Sr. Adv., with Mr. Himanshu Sethi, Ms. Aishwarya Chhabra, Advs.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLAHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVINDER DUDEJAORDER% 01.04.2026 MISC. APPEAL(PMLA) 79/20251. This appeal has been filed under Section 42 of Prevention ofMoney Laundering Act, 2002 challenging the order dated 29.05.2025 passed by the learned Appellate Tribunal under the SAFEMA at New Delhi in FPA-PMLA-3962/DLI/2021 titled Trident Infosol Pvt. Ltd. Vs. The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Delhi disposing of the appeal filed by the respondent herein in the following terms: Considered the submissions from both the sides. In view of the discharge of the Appellant in the PMLA case, and as there be no stay ...
M/S Prime Rigs Limited vs M/S Teamglobal Logistics Private Limited
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Apr-01-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CM(M) 2133/2025 & CM APPL. 69700/2025 M/S PRIME RIGS LIMITED .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Rajeev Bansal and Mr. Ajeet Kumar, Advs. (through VC)versusM/S TEAMGLOBAL LOGISTICS PRIVATE LIMITED .....Respondent Through: None.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJNEESH KUMAR GUPTAORDER% 01.04.20261. This hearing has been conducted through hybrid mode.2. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits that thepresent petition has become infructuous as the matter has been settled between the parties. He further prays that the present petition may be disposed of as withdrawn.3. Keeping in view the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the present petition is disposed of as withdrawn. Pending application(s), if any, also stands disposed of. RAJNEESH KUMAR GUPTA, J APRIL 01, 2026/sds/iskThis is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scann...
Krishan Lal vs Gs Patnaik
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-01-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CONT.CAS(C) 474/2011 KRISHAN LAL .....Petitioner Through: None.versusGS PATNAIK .....Respondent Through: Mr. Abhishek Wadhwa, Advocate (through VC).CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT SHARMAORDER% 01.04.20261. This hearing has been done through hybrid mode.2. The present petition under Sections 11 and 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act read with Section 151 of the CPC, seeks the following prayers:- i) direct the Respondent to allot an alternative plot to the petitioner in compliance with order dated 29.3.2011 ii) initiate contempt proceedings against the Respondent for disobeying and disregarding the order/ direction dated 29.3.2011Such other and further order which this Hon'ble Court deems fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case be also passed in favour of the petitioner and against the respondent.3. The present petition was adjourned sine die vide order dated 12.11.2014passed by the learned Predecessor Bench, in view ...
Shadab Khan vs Narcotic Control Bureau
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-01-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ BAIL APPLN. 4243/2025 SHADAB KHAN .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Akshay Bhandari, Ms. Megha Saroa, Mr. Kushal Kumar, Mr. Janak Raj Ambavat and Mr. Anmol Sachdeva, AdvocatesversusNARCOTIC CONTROL BUREAU .....Respondent Through: Mr. Arun Khatri, SSC (NCB), Ms. Shelly Dixit, Ms. Poonam Rani and Mr. Hitesh Nandal, AdvocatesCORAM:HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE SWARANA KANTA SHARMAORDER% 01.04.20261. By way of the instant application, the applicant seeks grant of regularbail in case arising out of Case No. VIII/42/DZU/2021, registered at Narcotics Control Bureau (NCB), Delhi for commission of offence punishable under Sections 8/22/23/29 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (hereafter NDPS Act).2. Briefly stated, the facts of the present case are that on 26.07.2021,acting upon secret information, officials of the complainant department had intercepted an export parcel bearing AWB No. 8007134192, destined for United States of Am...
Dr. Moushumi Basu vs Jawaharlal Nehru University & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-01-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 16856/2025 & CM APPL. 69251/2025 DR. MOUSHUMI BASU .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Amit Gupta, Ms. Mansi Kukreja, Mr. Kshitij Vaibhav, Ms. Muskan Nagpal, Advocates.versusJAWAHARLAL NEHRU UNIVERSITY & ORS......Respondents Through: Ms. Manisha Singh, Advocate for JNU.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV NARULAORDER% 01.04.20261. Counsel for the Petitioner seeks leave to withdraw the present petition, with liberty to file a fresh petition, in order to place on record additional documents arising out of subsequent developments.2. Considering that the matter is at a nascent stage and no interim orders have been passed, the prayer is allowed. Leave and liberty, as prayed for, are granted.3. Accordingly, the present petition is disposed of along with pending application(s). SANJEEV NARULA, J APRIL 1, 2026/abThis is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanni...
Mtnl vs M/S. Pecon Software Ltd.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-01-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ FAO (COMM) 311/2025 & CM APPL. 68964/2025 MTNL .....Appellant Through: Mr. Ravi Sikri, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Prashant Sharma, Adv.versusM/S. PECON SOFTWARE LTD. .....Respondent Through: Mr. Manik Dogra, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Mohit Seth, Mr. Dhruv Pande, Mr. Imon Bhattacharya, Mr. Shivanshu Tripathi, Advs.CORAM:JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH JUSTICE MADHU JAINORDER% 01.04.20261. This hearing has been done through hybrid mode.2. The present appeal has been filed by the Appellant under Section 37 ofthe Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter, the Act) read with Section 13 of the Commercial Courts Act, 2015, inter alia, assailing the impugned judgment dated 11th August, 2025 passed by the Id. District Judge, Commercial Court- 01, Patiala House Courts, New Delhi (hereinafter, 'impugned judgment').3. Vide the impugned judgment, the arbitral award dated 31st August, 2019 passed by the sole arbitrator has been partially set aside,...
M/S Splendor Landbase Limited vs M/S Ntt Data Global Delivery Services ...
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Apr-01-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ O.M.P. (COMM) 482/2025, I.A. 28440/2025 (Stay), I.A. 28441/2025 (Ex.) & I.A. 28636/2025 (For Delay of 2 days in Re-filing of the petition) M/S SPLENDOR LANDBASE LIMITED .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Praveen Kumar, Mr. Sarthak Gupta & Mr. Suman Raj, Advs.versusM/S NTT DATA GLOBAL DELIVERY SERVICES PRIVATE LIMITED .....Respondent Through: Mr. Vikas Tomar and Mr. Nimish Mishra, Advs.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARISH VAIDYANATHANSHANKARORDER% 01.04.20261. The present objection petition filed under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, assails the amended arbitral award dated 05.07.2025, passed by the learned Sole Arbitrator.2. Learned counsel for the Petitioner, on instructions, seeks liberty to withdraw the present petition, with leave to avail such remedies as may be available in law before the appropriate court.3. Liberty, as sought for, is granted.4. Accordingly, the present Petition, along with pending Applic...
Municipal Corporation of Delhi vs Rajesh Gupta
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-01-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ RFA 877/2024, CM APPL. 73121/2024 MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI .....Appellant Through: Mr. Siddhant Nath ( Standing counsel for MCD) Mr. Aman Khan (adv).versusRAJESH GUPTA .....Respondent Through: Appearance not given.CORAM:HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NEENA BANSAL KRISHNAORDER% 01.04.2026 CM APPL. 73122/2024 (under Section 5 of the Limitation Act read with Section 151 CPC on behalf of the Appellant seeking Condonation of Delay in filing the Appeal)1. An Application has been filed on behalf of the Appellant seeking Condonation of 293 days delay in filing the present Appeal.2. It is submitted in the Application that the Appeal has been preferredon 26.11.2024 to assail the Judgment and Decree dated 09.11.2023 on the ground that the Appellant MCD is a Government Organization, wherein for filing an Appeal procedural formalities inherent to a Government Organization have to be complied with. The permissions are required to be taken from multi...
- ‹ Prev
- 511
- 512
- 513
- 514
- 515
- 516
- 517
- 519
- 520
- 521
- Next ›
- Last »