Delhi Court April 2026 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Tushar Kant vs Sanjay Sharma & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-01-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI% Date of decision: 1st April 2026 + MAC APP. 331/2022 & CM APPL. 45662/2022 TUSHAR KANT .....Appellant Through: Mr. Aman Panwar, Adv. (Thru VC)versusSANJAY SHARMA & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Sahil Paul, Mr. Sandeep Dayal & Mr. Harmeet Singh Phillip, Advocates for R-3 NICCORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANISH DAYALJUDGMENTANISH DAYAL, J (ORAL)1. This appeal has been filed seeking enhancement of compensationawarded by judgment dated 9th August 2021 passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (MACT), Patiala House Courts, New Delhi in DAR No.348/18 awarding compensation of Rs.50,156/- along with interest @ 6% from the date of filing the petition.2. The accident in question occurred on 1st March 2018, when injuredwas driving his Pulsar motorcycle and collided with a Taxi (offending vehicle) bearing registration no. DL-1ZA-5699 coming from the wrong side on South Avenue Road; as a result, he suffered grievous injuries. MLC w...
Dharam Veer vs Bharat Sanchar Nigam Limited Through Its Chief Managing ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-01-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI% Judgment reserved on: 24.03.2026Judgment pronounced on: 01.04.2026Judgment uploaded on: 01.04.2026+ W.P.(C) 16123/2023 DHARAM VEER .....Petitioner Through: Ishita Kadiyan, Advocate.versusBHARAT SANCHAR NIGAM LIMITED THROUGH ITS CHIEF MANAGING DIRECTOR & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Ram Krishan, Advocate.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KSHETARPALHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT MAHAJANJUDGMENTANIL KSHETARPAL, J.:1. The Petitioner has invoked jurisdiction under Article 226 of theConstitution of India in order to challenge the correctness of the orderdated 05.09.2022 [hereinafter referred to as Impugned Order] passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal [hereinafter referred to as the Tribunal] in O.A. No. 1837/2015, whereby the said Original Application filed by the Petitioner, seeking directions to the Respondents to regularize his services at par with Sh. Naresh Kumar and Smt. Guddi, came to be dismissed.2. The primary issue whic...
Usha Deva & Ors vs Mohan Lal & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-01-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI% Reserved on : 15th January 2026Pronounced on : 1st April 2026Uploaded on : 2nd April 2026 + MAC.APP. 173/2016 USHA DEVI & ORS .....Appellants Through: Mr. Pankaj Gupta, Advocate.versusMOHAN LAL & ANR .....Respondents Through: Mr. Shadab Khan, Advocate for Respondent no.2. + MAC.APP. 725/2015 & CM APPL. 44495/2025 MOHAN LAL & ANR .....Appellants Through: Mr. Shadab Khan, Advocate.versusUSHA DEVI & ORS .....Respondents Through: Mr. Pankaj Gupta, Advocate for Respondent nos.1 & 2.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANISH DAYALJUDGMENTANISH DAYAL, J.1. This appeal has been filed assailing the impugned award dated 2nd July 2015 passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Rohini Courts, (North-West), Delhi (MACT/Tribunal) in MACT No.433/2008. The MAC.APP. 173/2016 and MAC.APP. 725/2015 Page 1/22 cross-appeal has been filed by the claimants seeking enhancement of compensation. The Incident2. On 27th February 2008 at ab...
Akash@Akku vs the State (Nct of Delhi) & Anr.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Apr-01-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CRL.M.C. 9263/2023 AKASH@AKKU .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Mukesh Kumar Mall, Advocate (through V.C.).versusTHE STATE (NCT OF DELHI) & ANR. .....Respondent Through: Mr. Sunil Kumar Gautam, APP for the State.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ JAINORDER% 01.04.20261. Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks to withdraw the present petition which seeks quashing of FIR.2. He submits that after comprehensive trial, the accused has already been acquitted by the learned Trial Court on 01.05.2025 and, therefore, nothing survives in the present petition.3. In view of the above, the present petition is disposed of, as having become infructuous. MANOJ JAIN, J APRIL 1, 2026/ss/jsThis is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 06/04/2026 at 10:28:43...
Perspi Interactive Pvt. Ltd. and Ors vs the State (Govt. of N.C.T. of ...
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Apr-01-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CRL.M.C. 5621/2024, CRL.M.A. 21465/2024 & CRL.M.A. 21466/2024 PERSPI INTERACTIVE PVT. LTD. AND ORS. .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Ravin Rao, Mr. Pallav Gupta, Mr. Akshit Sawal, Mr. Ayan Sharma, Ms. Jannat Garg, Mr. Ayush Kumar and Ms. Chandni Sharma, Advocates.versusTHE STATE (GOVT. OF N.C.T. OF DELHI) AND ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Manoj Pant, APP for the State with Inspector Manjeet Kumar, Crime Branch.CORAM:HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE SWARANA KANTA SHARMAORDER% 01.04.20261. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioners seeks permission to withdraw the present petitions with liberty to file afresh as and when the need so arises.2. Accordingly, the present petition, along with pending applications, stands dismissed as withdrawn, with liberty as prayed for.3. The order be uploaded on the website forthwith. DR. SWARANA KANTA SHARMA, J APRIL 01, 2026/zp/rThis is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be ...
Bhupender Singh vs State of Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Apr-01-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ BAIL APPLN. 3108/2025 BHUPENDER SINGH .....Petitioner Through: Mr. J.S. Boora and Mr. Shekhar, AdvocatesversusSTATE OF NCT OF DELHI .....Respondent Through: Mr. Sunil Kumar Gautam, APP for State with SI Sunichi, PS Fatehpur BeriCORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ JAINORDER% 01.04.2026 CRL.M.A. 24146/2025 (for exemption) Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions. BAIL APPLN. 3108/20251. Applicant seeks bail in case FIR No. 386/2024 dated 26.07.2024, registered at Police Station Fatehpur Beri for commission of offences 64(1)/62 of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023.2. Though, the case had been registered for commission of offence underSection 64 Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (corresponding Section 376 IPC for committing rape), fact remains that when charges were ascertained by the learned Trial Court, applicant was not charged with said offence. As perorder on charge, he is facing trial for offences under Section 74 (outragingmodesty), Sec...
Zapdor Ubc Abn(Jv) vs Jain Steel Industries
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-01-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ O.M.P. (COMM) 53/2024, I.A. 2059/2024 (Stay), I.A. 2060/2024 (Delay of 20 days in filing the petition), I.A. 2061/2024 (Delay of 12 days in Re-filing the petition) & I.A. 37060/2024 (Seeking dismissal of the petition) ZAPDOR UBC ABN(JV) .....Petitioner Through: None.versusJAIN STEEL INDUSTRIES .....Respondent Through: Mr. Vilas Sharma and Mr. Ajay Sharma, Advs.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARISH VAIDYANATHANSHANKARORDER% 01.04.20261. The present Petition has been instituted under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, impugning the Arbitral Award dated 21.03.2023.2. None appears on behalf of the Petitioner, even on the second call.3. It is noted that on earlier dates, i.e., 10.09.2025 and 19.01.2026, none had appeared on behalf of the Petitioner.4. In view of the above, it appears that the Petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the present petition.5. Accordingly, the present petition is dismissed for non- pros...
Yeheil Amos Tohar vs Union of India the F.R.R.O & Ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-01-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(CRL) 2709/2025 & CRL.M.A. 25506/2025 YEHEIL AMOS TOHAR .....Petitioner Through: Ms. Aayushi Gaur with Ms. Rishi Raj Singh, Advocates.versusUNION OF INDIA THE F.R.R.O & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Rohan Jaitley, CGSC with Mr. Akshay Sharma, Mr. Dev Pratap Shahi, Mr. Varun Pratap Singh, Mr. Yogya Bhatia, Advocates and Insp. Satish, FRRO. Mr. Arun Khatri, Senior Standing Counsel with Ms. Shelly Dixit, Advocate.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANUP JAIRAM BHAMBHANIORDER% 01.04.2026 By way of the present petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India read with section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure 1973, the petitioner seeks directions to respondent No.1 to deport him back to his home country i.e., Australia and to release his passport which is in the custody of the learned trial court.2. Ms. Aayushi Gaur, learned counsel appearing for the petitionersubmits, that the petitioners prayer arises from the...
Ms Renu vs Mr Vikas Datika
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Apr-01-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CONT.CAS(C) 1225/2024 MS RENU .....Petitioner Through: Ms. Mansi Sharma and Mr. Rehan Verma, Advocates.versusMR VIKAS DATIKA .....Respondent Through:CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SACHIN DATTAORDER% 01.04.20261. Vide order dated 28.10.2025, it was recorded as under: 1. This hearing has been done through hybrid mode.2. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of parties submit that the parties have settled their differences vide settlement agreement dated 22.09.2025 before Delhi High Court Mediation and Conciliation Centre.3. It is further submitted that, in view of the aforesaid agreement, the parties have filed a petition seeking divorce by mutual consent and first motion is listed before the concerned learned Family Court for tomorrow.4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits that the present petition may be deferred till the filing of the second motion and granting decree of divorce.5. At request, list for compliance o...
David Seekamatte vs Narcotics Control Bureau
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Apr-01-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ BAIL APPLN. 2723/2025 DAVID SEEKAMATTE .....Applicant Through: Mr. Lewish Edward, Mr. P. Vignesh, Mr. Sameer and Mr. Ayush Khurana, Advocates.versusNARCOTICS CONTROL BUREAU .....Respondent Through: Mr. Arun Khatri, SSC and Ms. Shelly Dixit, Adv.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAURABH BANERJEEORDER% 01.04.20261. After some arguments, learned counsel for the applicant seeks leave to withdraw the present bail application with liberty to approach the learned Trial Court for raising fresh pleas raised herein.2. As such, the present bail application, is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for.SAURABH BANERJEE, J.APRIL 01, 2026/So This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 06/04/2026 at 10:09:18...
- ‹ Prev
- 510
- 511
- 512
- 513
- 514
- 516
- 517
- 518
- 519
- 520
- Next ›
- Last »