Delhi Court April 2026 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Ajay Kumar Sharma & Ors vs B K Ahuja & Ors
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Apr-01-2026
$~18 & 19* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CONT.CAS(C) 905/2015 AJAY KUMAR SHARMA & ORS .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Prakash Khandelwal, Advocate for P-12.versusB K AHUJA & ORS .....Respondents Through: Mr. Aditya Narayan Tripathy and Dr. Kedar Nath Tripathy, Advocates. + CONT.CAS(C) 85/2016 AJAY KUMAR SHARMA & ORS .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Prakash Khandelwal, Advocate for P-12.versusB K AHUJA & ORS .....Respondents Through: Mr. Aditya Narayan Tripathy and Dr. Kedar Nath Tripathy, Advocates.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT SHARMAORDER% 01.04.20261. This hearing has been done through hybrid mode.2. The present petitions under Section 2(b) read with Section 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, have been filed, inter alia, seeking wilfuldisobedience of order dated 06.02.2015 in W.P.(C) 6367/2014, and orderdated 05.01.2016 in W.P.(C) 6737/2015 passed by the learned Coordinate Bench of this Court.3. Vide order dated 06.02.2015 in W.P.(C) 6367/2014,...
Sh. Neeraj Gauba vs Smt. Durga @ Pinki
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Apr-01-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CRL.REV.P. 577/2019 SH. NEERAJ GAUBA .....Petitioner Through: NoneversusSMT. DURGA @ PINKI .....Respondent Through: Mr. Manoj Sharma, Mr. Kapil Kaushik, AdvocatesCORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAURABH BANERJEEORDER% 01.04.20261. Since there was no appearance on behalf of the petitioner on 13.02.2026. Same is the position today as he is again not represented. As per the Death Certificate on record, the petitioner has since expired.2. As such, since the present petition has become infructuous, the same is dismissed.SAURABH BANERJEE, J.APRIL 01, 2026/So This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 06/04/2026 at 10:38:22...
Nitin vs State Nct of Delhi
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Apr-01-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ BAIL APPLN. 1662/2024 & CRL.M.A. 25631/2025 NITIN .....Petitioner Through: None.versusSTATE NCT OF DELHI .....Respondent Through: Mr. Amit Ahlawat, APP for State.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GIRISH KATHPALIAORDER% 01.04.20261. The accused/applicant seeks regular bail in case FIR No. 273/2021ofPolice Station GTB Enclave for offence under Section 302/307/148/120B IPC and Section 25/27 of Arms Act. 1.1 This bail application came up for the first hearing on 10.05.2024 before the predecessor bench and thereafter continued getting adjourned before different benches. Along with 179 such old pending bail applications, this application also was transferred to this bench. 1.2 Today is the first hearing before me.2. Since none appears for accused/applicant, the matter is passed over. APRIL 1, 2026/as Present: Mr. B.P. Sharma and Ms. Samsun, Advocates. Mr. Amit Ahlawat, APP for State with Inspector Devi Lal.3. In this second call, after addr...
M/S Krishan Kumar Sole Proprietor M/S Balaji Glowtics vs M/S Jailaxmi ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-01-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHIReserved on: 28th March, 2026 Date of Decision: 01st April, 2026 + CM(M) 2569/2024 & CM APPL. 28662/2024 M/S KRISHAN KUMAR SOLE PROPRIETOR M/S BALAJI GLOWTICS .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Virendra Rawat, Mr. Rishabh Sharma and Mr. Siddharth N., Advs.versusM/S JAILAXMI ENTERPRISES PVT LTD .....Respondent Through: Mr. Shubham Jai and Mr. Ashish Kumar Arya, Advs.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJNEESH KUMAR GUPTAORDER1. The present petition has been filed under Article 227 of theConstitution of India, assailing the order dated 12th January 2024 passed by the learned Trial Court in C.S. (COMM.) No. 37/2023, whereby the applications filed by the petitioner - one under Order VIII Rule 1 read with Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) seeking restoration of the right to file the written statement, and another application for condonation of delay in filing the written statement have been dismissed.2. Heard. Record perused.3. Le...
Ms Sainath Sales and Services Pvt Ltd vs Delhi Urban Shelters Imporvem ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-01-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 8542/2023 and CM APPL. 32508/2023 MS SAINATH SALES AND SERVICES PVT LTD .....Petitioner Through: None.versusDELHI URBAN SHELTERS IMPORVEMENT BOARD & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Rishikant Singh, Mr. Dinesh Kumar and Mr. Manoj Jadly, Advocates for R-1. Mr. Anubhav Gupta , Panel Counsel ( Civil) GNCTD, Mr. Kartik Sharma, Advocate for R-2.CORAM:HONBLE MR. JUSTICE PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAVORDER% 01.04.20261. None appears for the petitioner.2. None had appeared for the petitioner on 13.03.2024, 07.08.2024, 29.10.2024, 24.02.2025, 18.08.2025 as well.3. Accordingly, the petition stands dismissed for want of prosecution. PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV, J APRIL 1, 2026 aksThis is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 06/04/2026 at 11:22:51...
Suresh Gupta & Anr vs Gs Patnayak & Anr
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-01-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CONT.CAS(C) 105/2012 SURESH GUPTA & ANR .....Petitioners Through: None.versusGS PATNAYAK & ANR .....Respondents Through: Mr. Abhishek Wadhwa, Advocate (through VC).CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT SHARMAORDER% 01.04.20261. This hearing has been done through hybrid mode.2. The present petition under Section 12 of the Contempt of Courts Actseeks the following prayers:- a) proceed against the Respondents and punish them for non-compliance of orders dated 10.01.2011 and 21.10.2011 passed by this Hon'ble Court as per the provisions of Contempt of Courts Act, 1971; and/or b) direct the Respondents to comply with the directions given by this Hon'ble Court in the Orders dated 10.01.2011 and 21.10.2011; and/or c) impose costs of the present Petition; d) pass any other or further orders which this Honble Court may deem fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case.3. Vide judgment dated 10.01.2011, learned Single Judg...
Sachin Nishad vs Poonam
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Apr-01-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CRL.REV.P. 707/2024 & CRL.M.A. 16279/2024 SACHIN NISHAD .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Prateek Kumar, AdvocateversusPOONAM .....Respondent Through: Ms. Sunita Arora, Advocate (DHCLSC)CORAM:HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE SWARANA KANTA SHARMAORDER% 01.04.20261. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the instant criminal revision petition, without prejudice to his rights and contentions.2. Accordingly, the present petition alongwith pending application i.e. CRL.M.A. 16279/2024 stands dismissed as withdrawn3. The order be uploaded on the website forthwith. DR. SWARANA KANTA SHARMA, J APRIL 01, 2026/ns/GJThis is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 08/04/2026 at 11:54:36...
Rajender Singh Yadav & Ors vs Nawab Singh & Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-01-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI% Reserved on : 19th February 2026Pronounced on : 01st April 2026Uploaded on : 02nd April 2026 + MAC.APP. 1165/2013 UTTAR PRADESH STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION. .....Appellant Through: Mr. Shadab Khan, Advocate.versusRAJENDER SINGH & ORS .....Respondents Through: Mr. Jatinder Kumar, Advocate for R-1 to 4. + MAC.APP. 171/2014 RAJENDER SINGH YADAV & ORS .....Appellants Through: Mr. Jatinder Kumar, Advocate for A-1 to 4.versusNAWAB SINGH & ORS. .....Respondent Through: Mr. Shadab Khan, Advocate for R-2.CORAM:HONBLE MR. JUSTICE ANISH DAYALJUDGMENTANISH DAYAL, J.1. These are cross appeals filed by owner of offending vehicle, Uttar Pradesh State Road Transport Corporation (UPSRTC) in MAC APP (LRs) of deceased/Sachin Yadav (hereinafter, claimants) in MAC KUMAR CHOUDHARY MAC.APP. 1165/2013 & MAC. APP 171/2014 Page 1 of 23APP. 171/2014. Owner/UPSRTC seeks to assail the impugned award dated 29th October 2013 passed by Motor Accide...
Suman Devi & Ors. vs Union of India
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-01-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI% Reserved on : 13.02.2026Pronounced on : 01.04.2026Uploaded on : 01.04.2026 + FAO 156/2023 SUMAN DEVI & ORS. .....Appellants Through: Mr. Rajan Sood, Ms. Ashima Sood and Ms. Megha Sood, AdvocatesversusUNION OF INDIA .....Respondent Through: Mr. Vikrant N. Goyal, Mr. Yash Basoya, Nr. Rakshit Tyagi and Mr.Kunal Dixit, AdvocatesCORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR OHRIJUDGMENT1. The present appeal has been preferred under Section 23 of theRailway Claims Tribunal Act, 1987, assailing the judgment dated 31.10.2022 passed by the Railway Claims Tribunal, Principal Bench, Delhi (hereinafter referred to as the Tribunal), in Case No. OA/II(u)/DLI/198/2019, titled as Smt. Suman Devi & Ors. v. Union of India.2. Vide the aforesaid judgment, the Tribunal dismissed the claimapplication filed by the appellants herein on the ground that the deceased was neither a bona fide passenger nor the alleged accident an untoward incident as define...
Sp Singla Constructions Pvt Ltd vs State of Jharkhand & Anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-01-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI% Judgment reserved on: 12.03.2026Judgment pronounced on: 01.04.2026+ O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.) 384/2024, I.A. 10888/2024 (Ex.) & I.A. 38745/2024 (Stay) SP SINGLA CONSTRUCTIONS PVT LTD .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Anirudh Wadhwa, Mr. Kartik Gupta and Mr. Vibhu Pahuja, Advocates.versusSTATE OF JHARKHAND & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Sachin Kumar, Additional Advocate General, Mr. Kumar Anurag Singh and Mr. Zain A. Khan, Advocates, for Respondent No. 1. Ms. Astha Sharma and Mr. Nikhil Anand, Advocates, for Respondent No. 2.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARISH VAIDYANATHANSHANKARJUDGMENTHARISH VAIDYANATHAN SHANKAR, J.1. The present Petition has been instituted under Sub-sections (4)and (5) of Section 29A of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 19961, inter alia, seeking the regularisation of the period commencing from 03.12.2023 and the grant of a further extension of twelve A&C Act By:VARNIKA O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.) 384/2024 Page...
- ‹ Prev
- 508
- 509
- 510
- 511
- 512
- 514
- 515
- 516
- 517
- 518
- Next ›
- Last »