Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Nitin vs State Nct of Delhi

NITIN vs State Nct of Delhi

Type Court Judgment Court Delhi Orders Decided Apr 01, 2026
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1266403

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Delhi Orders High Court
Judge
Decided On
Case Number
BAIL APPLN./1662/2024
Subject
Land Acquisition

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Land Acquisition

Key legal issue
Land Acquisition

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

NITIN

Respondent

State Nct of Delhi

Advocate Mr. Amit Ahlawat

Excerpt

* in the high court of delhi at new delhi+ bail appln. 1662/2024 & crl.m.a. 25631/2025 nitin .....petitioner through: none.versusstate nct of delhi .....respondent through: mr. amit ahlawat, app for state.coram:hon'ble mr. justice girish kathpaliaorder% 01.04.20261. the accused/applicant seeks regular bail in case fir no. 273/2021ofpolice station gtb enclave for offence under section 302/307/148/120b ipc and section 25/27 of arms act. 1.1 this bail application came up for the first hearing on 10.05.2024 before the predecessor bench and thereafter continued getting adjourned before different benches. along with 179 such old pending bail applications, this application also was transferred to this bench. 1.2 today is the first hearing before me.2. since none appears for accused/applicant, the matter is passed over. april 1, 2026/as present: mr. b.p. sharma and ms. samsun, advocates. mr. amit ahlawat, app for state with inspector devi lal.3. in this second call, after addressing partly, learned counsel for accused/applicant on instructions seeks permission to withdraw this bail application with liberty to file afresh before the trial court after completion of testimony of eye witnesses namely sonu, suresh, sandeep, amit and omwati.4. as requested, the bail application and the accompanying application are dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as sought.5. learned trial court is directed to expedite the recording of the testimony of the said eye witnesses. april 1, 2026/ry

Full Judgment

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+ BAIL APPLN. 1662/2024 & CRL.M.A. 25631/2025 NITIN .....Petitioner Through: None.

versus

STATE NCT OF DELHI .....Respondent Through: Mr. Amit Ahlawat, APP for State.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GIRISH KATHPALIA

ORDER

% 01.04.2026

1. The accused/applicant seeks regular bail in case FIR No. 273/2021of

Police Station GTB Enclave for offence under Section 302/307/148/120B IPC and Section 25/27 of Arms Act. 1.1 This bail application came up for the first hearing on 10.05.2024 before the predecessor bench and thereafter continued getting adjourned before different benches. Along with 179 such old pending bail applications, this application also was transferred to this bench. 1.2 Today is the first hearing before me.

2. Since none appears for accused/applicant, the matter is passed over. APRIL 1, 2026/as Present: Mr. B.P. Sharma and Ms. Samsun, Advocates. Mr. Amit Ahlawat, APP for State with Inspector Devi Lal.

3. In this second call, after addressing partly, learned counsel for accused/applicant on instructions seeks permission to withdraw this bail application with liberty to file afresh before the trial court after completion of testimony of eye witnesses namely Sonu, Suresh, Sandeep, Amit and Omwati.

4. As requested, the bail application and the accompanying application are dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as sought.

5. Learned trial court is directed to expedite the recording of the testimony of the said eye witnesses. APRIL 1, 2026/ry

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial