Delhi Court April 2026 Judgments
Browse smarter
Open an 18-section brief on any judgment
Structured AI Brief in seconds on any result - plus Semantic Search when you need meaning, not just keywords.
- AI Brief & Ask
- Semantic AI Search
- Devil's Bench
Credentials emailed - log in to pick up where you left off.
Tv Radha Krishnan vs State Govt of Nct of Delhi Through Sho Crime Bran ...
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Apr-29-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(CRL) 1390/2026, CRL.M.A. 13305/2026 TV RADHA KRISHNAN .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Vijay Tangri, Adv.versusSTATE GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI THROUGH SHO CRIME BRANCH SOUTH EAST & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Amol Sinha, ASC for State with Mr. Kshitiz Garg, Mr. Ashvini Kumar, Ms. Chavi Lazarus and Mr. Nitish Dhawan and Mr. Ankit Kumar, Advs. SI Anuj Chhikara, PS.: Crime BranchCORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAURABH BANERJEEORDER% 29.04.2026 CRL.M.A. 13306/2026 (Delay of 14 days in re-filing)1. By virtue of the present application, the petitioner seekscondonation of a delay of 14 days in re-filing of the present petition.2. For the reasons stated in the present application, the same is allowedand the delay of 14 days in re-filing of the present petition is condoned.3. As such, the application is disposed of.W.P.(CRL) 1390/2026 (Exemption)4. By virtue of the present petition under Section 528 of the Bhar...
Bhagwan Balmiki Ashram and Vyamshala (Akhara) Regd. vs Maulana Azad Me ...
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Apr-29-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CM(M) 810/2026 & CM APPL. 23915/2026 (stay) BHAGWAN BALMIKI ASHRAM AND VYAMSHALA (AKHARA) REGD. .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Aditya Gaur, Adv.versusMAULANA AZAD MEDICAL COLLEGE & ANR. .....Respondents Through: None.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT SHARMAORDER% 29.04.20261. This hearing has been done through hybrid mode.CM APPL. 23916/2026 (Exemption)2. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. The application is disposed of.CM(M) 810/2026 & CM APPL. 23915/2026 (stay)3. The present petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India,1950, read with Section 151 of the CPC seeks the following prayers: -a) Set aside the order 10.3.2026 passed in appeal U/s. 9 of Public Premises Act being PPA No.02/2026 titled as Bhagwan Balmiki Ashram & Vyamshala (Akhara) Regd. vs. Maulana Azad Medical College & Anr. passed by Ms. Anju Bajaj Chandna, Principal District & Sessions Judge (Central), Tis Hazar...
Aman Malik Advocate vs Union of India & Ors.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Apr-29-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 5804/2026 AMAN MALIK ADVOCATE .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Atishay Jain & Ms. Diksha Jindal, Advs.versusUNION OF INDIA & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Jivesh Kr. Tiwari, CGSC with Ms. Nandini Aggarwal & Ms. Samiksha, Advs. for R-1/UOI. Ms. Chand Chopra with Mr. Punishk Handa, Advs. for R-2/DDA. Mr. Roshan Lal Goel & Mr. Mukesh Gupta, Advs. for R-3/MCD.CORAM:HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICEHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TEJAS KARIAORDER% 29.04.20261. Heard Mr. Atishay Jain, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner,Ms. Chand Chopra, learned counsel representing the DDA and Mr. Roshan Lal Goel, learned counsel representing MCD.2. This petition purportedly in Public Interest has been filed by thepetitioner who has described himself to be an advocate with the prayer to issue appropriate direction to the respondents to remove/demolish the alleged illegal and unauthorised construction/encroachment said t...
All Dwarka Resident Federation Through Its Vice President Ms. Kavita C ...
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Apr-29-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 5869/2026 ALL DWARKA RESIDENT FEDERATION THROUGH ITS VICE PRESIDENT MS. KAVITA CHOUDHARY .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Aakash Dahiya, Mr. Shubham Bhushan, Mr. Karan Gautam, Advs.versusGOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS. .....Respondents Through: None.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAVORDER% 29.04.2026 CM APPL. 28842/20261. Exemptions allowed, subject to all just exceptions.2. Application stands disposed of.W.P.(C) 5869/20263. The petitioner seeks for implementation of the order passed by theSub Divisional Magistrate (Headquarter) District Magistrate (South West).4. If the petitioner has any grievance with respect to non implementationof the said order, he shall always be at liberty to approach the higher authorities such as the District Magistrate or the Divisional Commissioner.5. There cannot be a direction by the High Court to implement the orderpassed by the Sub Divisional...
Ankit Rana vs Rashmi
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Apr-29-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ CM(M) 978/2026 ANKIT RANA .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Rahul Madan, Advocate.versusRASHMI .....Respondent Through:CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT SHARMAORDER% 29.04.20261. This hearing has been done through hybrid mode.CM APPL. 28713/2026 (Exemption)2. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. The application is disposed of.CM(M) 978/20263. The present petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India seeksthe following prayers: a) Allow the present Petition; b) Direct Expeditious disposal of the HMA/1158/18 currently pending the Court of Sh. Deepak Garg, Ld. PJFC, North Rohini Court, Delhi in a time bound manner; c) Pass any other appropriate order as deemed fit and proper in the circumstances of the case may also be granted in favour of the Petitioner.4. Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks leave to withdraw the presentpetition with liberty to file appropriate application before the learned Fa...
Nb Ris Sharwan Singh vs Union of India and Ors
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Apr-29-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 5831/2026 and CM APPL. 28664/2026 NB RIS SHARWAN SINGH .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Janesh Kumar, Adv.versusUNION OF INDIA AND ORS .....Respondents Through: Ms. Avshreya Pratap Singh Rudy, CGSC along with Ms. Usha Jamnal, Ms. Nyasa Sharma, Mr. Ankit Khatri, Advs. and Lt. Col. A. S. Thind/PBG and Major Anish Muralidhar.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KSHETARPALHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT MAHAJANORDER% 29.04.20261. At the outset, learned counsel representing the Respondentssubmits that the Petitioner is required to file an application before the learned Armed Forces Tribunal, Principal Bench, New Delhi [hereinafter referred to as Tribunal]. It is further submitted that the relief sought in prayer c of the Petition is maintainable before the Tribunal and consequently, prayer b can also be considered by the Tribunal.2. At this stage, learned counsel representing the Petitioner seeksand is granted permission of this Court ...
Amit Kumar Rai vs Municipal Corporation of Delhi and Ors
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Apr-29-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 5845/2026, CM APPL. 28676/2026 & CM APPL. AMIT KUMAR RAI .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Akramur Rahman and Mr. Hanzala Ahmed, Advocates.versusMUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI AND ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Shivam Sachdeva, Additional standing counsel for MCD with Mr. Yash Agrawal, Mr. Sparsh Ruhela and Ms. Sanjana Chib, Advocates for R-1/MCD. Mr. Arjun Mahajan, SC with Ms. Monica Batra, Mr. Apoorv Upmanyu, Mr. Ravikant Kumar and Mr. Vishal Sejwal, Advocates for R-4/DDA. Mr. Jitesh Vikram Srivastava, SPC with Mr. Prajesh Vikram, Advocate for R-3 (through VC).CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT BANSALORDER% 29.04.20261. The present writ petition has been filed seeking a direction to therespondent-MCD to take action against respondent no.5 for carrying out unauthorized construction at Flat No.174-C, DDA Janta Flats Shahpur Jat, New Delhi (subject property). W.P.(C) 5845/2026 Page 1 of 22. Counsel appearing on behalf of the...
Raunaq Singh Chandhok vs Union of India & Ors.
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Apr-29-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 5818/2026, CM APPL. 28633/2026 & CM APPL. 28634/2026 RAUNAQ SINGH CHANDHOK .....Petitioner Through: Mr. A. Maittri & Ms. Radhika Kushaldas, Advs.versusUNION OF INDIA & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Indruj Singh Rai, SSC with Mr.Sanjeev Menon, JSC & Mr. Rahul Singh, JSC, Ms. Priya Sarkar, JSC and Mr. Gaurav Kumar, Adv.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH MEHTAHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMARORDER% 29.04.20261. Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the present petition.2. Permission granted.3. The writ petition stands dismissed as withdrawn. All pending applications are also disposed of. DINESH MEHTA, J VINOD KUMAR, J APRIL 29, 2026/kkThis is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 02/05/2026 at 12:51:09...
Ssj Mining Pvt Ltd vs Hindustan Zinc Ltd
Court: Delhi Orders
Decided on: Apr-29-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.) 360/2026 SSJ MINING PVT LTD .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Aayush Agarwala, Ms. Kritika Bhardwaj & Mr. Vipul Singh, Advs.versusHINDUSTAN ZINC LTD .....Respondent Through: Mr. Uday N. Tiwary, Mr. Akshat Tiwary & Mr. Nitesh Kumar, Advs.CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AVNEESH JHINGANORDER% 29.04.20261. This petition is filed under Section 29A of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996 seeking extension of period for concluding the arbitration proceedings.2. Learned counsel for the respondent has no serious objection to the prayer made.3. In view of the above, the time period for conclusion of the proceedings is extended by six months.4. This petition is disposed of in the aforesaid terms. AVNEESH JHINGAN, J APRIL 29, 2026 JKThis is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the...
Delhi Gymnsatic Association vs Gymnsatics Federation of India and Ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-29-2026
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ LPA 327/2026, CM APPL. 28732/2026 & CM APPL. 28733/2026 DELHI GYMNSATIC ASSOCIATION .....Appellant Through: Mr. Syed Rehan, Advocate.versusGYMNSATICS FEDERATION OF INDIA AND ORS .....Respondents Through: Appearance not given.CORAM:HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICEHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TEJAS KARIAORDER% 29.04.20261. Heard the learned Counsel for the Parties.2. On being pointed out that the instant intra-court Appeal has been preferred against an order dated 16.04.2026, which is purely an interlocutoryorder and cannot be termed to be a Judgment, the learned Counsel for theAppellant seeks to withdraw the Appeal with the liberty to move an appropriate application in the pending writ petition.3. Accordingly, the present Appeal is dismissed as withdrawn with the liberty as prayed for. DEVENDRA KUMAR UPADHYAYA, CJ TEJAS KARIA, J APRIL 29, 2026/smsThis is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High...
- ‹ Prev
- 27
- 28
- 29
- 30
- 31
- 33
- 34
- 35
- 36
- 37
- Next ›
- Last »